Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1854–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brothers Construction Co. v. Viriginia Employment Commissiongreen1 sentence2023Comm’n, 26 Va. App. 286, 293 (1998) (quoting Va. Emp. | 1 | 1 |
Mitchell v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2010I had no question in my mind. . . ." Simply stated, the circuit court made an unchallenged factual finding that the waiver of the right to a jury trial was limited to the first trial, and as the Court of Appeals stated in Mitchell v. Commonwealth, 30 Va.App. 520, 529 , 518 S.E.2d 330, 334 (1999): "A limited waiver, by its terms, will limit or specify the period to which it applies." Accordingly, the circuit court properly held that Whitaker was entitled to demand a jury trial in the proceeding held upon remand. 2010I had no question in my mind. . . ." Simply stated, the circuit court made an unchallenged factual finding that the waiver of the right to a jury trial was limited to the first trial, and as the Court of Appeals stated in Mitchell v. Commonwealth, 30 Va.App. 520, 529 , 518 S.E.2d 330, 334 (1999): "A limited waiver, by its terms, will limit or specify the period to which it applies." Accordingly, the circuit court properly held that Whitaker was entitled to demand a jury trial in the proceeding held upon remand. | 1 | 1 |
Kasi v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2000In Kasi v. Commonwealth, 256 Va. 407, 419 , 508 S.E.2d 57, 64 (1998), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2399 , 144 L.Ed.2d 798 (1999), the Virginia Supreme Court noted that “there is no reported authority for the idea that a violation of the [Vienna Convention] creates any legally enforceable individual rights. 2000In Kasi v. Commonwealth, 256 Va. 407, 419 , 508 S.E.2d 57, 64 (1998), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2399 , 144 L.Ed.2d 798 (1999), the Virginia Supreme Court noted that “there is no reported authority for the idea that a violation of the [Vienna Convention] creates any legally enforceable individual rights. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lawrence v. Commonwealth
neutral
2 sentences1874Lawrence v. Com., 81 Va. 484 . 1874Lawrence v. Com., 81 Va. 484 . | 3 | 1874–1874 |
Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America v. Bartgis
green
1 sentence2000In Kasi v. Commonwealth, 256 Va. 407, 419 , 508 S.E.2d 57, 64 (1998), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2399 , 144 L.Ed.2d 798 (1999), the Virginia Supreme Court noted that “there is no reported authority for the idea that a violation of the [Vienna Convention] creates any legally enforceable individual rights. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Concorde-New Horizons Corp. v. Shoptalk, Ltd.
green
1 sentence2000In Kasi v. Commonwealth, 256 Va. 407, 419 , 508 S.E.2d 57, 64 (1998), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2399 , 144 L.Ed.2d 798 (1999), the Virginia Supreme Court noted that “there is no reported authority for the idea that a violation of the [Vienna Convention] creates any legally enforceable individual rights. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Johnson's Adm'r v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
neutral
1 sentence1902Co., supra. I cannot reconcile the idea of hearing a case as upon a demurrer to evidence, and at the same time requiring the evidence to exclude all doubt as to the correctness of the demurrant’s position. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Reynolds v. Cook
green
2 sentences1854Reynolds v. Cook. 83 Va. 817 , 3 S. E. 1854Reynolds v. Cook. 83 Va. 817 , 3 S. E. | 1 | 1854–1854 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.