Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1935–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Id. at 438, 924 P.2d 908 (citing Swan, 37 Wash.2d at 535-36 , 225 P.2d 199 ). 2004The fifth factor is “whether the deed contained a clause providing that if the railroad ceased to operate, the land conveyed would revert to the grantor.” Brown, 130 Wn.2d at 438 . | 1 | 3 |
King County v. Squire Investment Co.green1 sentence2004Squire, 59 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Swan v. O'LEARY
green
2 sentences2006Id. at 438, 924 P.2d 908 (citing Swan, 37 Wash.2d at 535-36 , 225 P.2d 199 ). 2006Id. at 438, 924 P.2d 908 (citing Swan, 37 Wash.2d at 535-36 , 225 P.2d 199 ). | 5 | 1978–2006 |
Scott v. Wallitner
green
1 sentence2006Id. at 438 (citing Swan, 37 Wn.2d at 535-36 ). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. Miller
green
2 sentences1935Another rule stated in that same section, however, is as follows: “It is essential, however, that the purchaser should have knowledge of the fact that the deed contained a clause assuming payment of the mortgage, and that he assented to the condition.” (Italics mine.) It is said that that portion of the text from 2 Jones on Mortgages (8th ed.), cited in the majority opinion, has been expressly adopted by us in Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. Miller, 155 Wash. 479 , 284 Pac. 751 . 1935Another rule stated in that same section, however, is as follows: “It is essential, however, that the purchaser should have knowledge of the fact that the deed contained a clause assuming payment of the mortgage, and that he assented to the condition.” (Italics mine.) It is said that that portion of the text from 2 Jones on Mortgages (8th ed.), cited in the majority opinion, has been expressly adopted by us in Federal Land Bank of Spokane v. Miller, 155 Wash. 479 , 284 Pac. 751 . | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.