8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jayedeane Thompson v. American Home Assurance Company, Cross-Appelleegreen1 sentence2003The Sixth Circuit discussed the tension between Johnson and Hansen in Thompson v. American Home Assurance Co., 95 F.3d 429, 435-36 (6th Cir. 1996). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Parker
green
1 sentence2025Parker, 132 Wn.2d at 189 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Allen
green
1 sentence2025This court has previously recognized “the difference in analysis between multiple prosecutions and multiple punishments.” Arndt, 194 Wn.2d at 817 (citing State v. Allen, 192 Wn.2d 526 , 541, 431 P.3d 117 (2018)). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Arndt
green
1 sentence2025This court has previously recognized “the difference in analysis between multiple prosecutions and multiple punishments.” Arndt, 194 Wn.2d at 817 (citing State v. Allen, 192 Wn.2d 526 , 541, 431 P.3d 117 (2018)). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Quismundo
green
1 sentence2023App. 2d 433, 450 n.7, 523 P.3d 822 (2023) (“[O]ur Supreme Court has made clear that a court’s ‘obligation to follow the law remains the same regardless of the arguments raised by the parties before it.’ ” (quoting State v. Quismundo, 164 Wn.2d 499, 505-06 , 192 P.3d 342 (2008))). 16 No. 83745-1-I/17 have made a difference in the analysis. 7 Indeed, the statute applies to claims arising from a person “having constructed, altered, or repaired any improvement upon real property.” RCW 4.16.300 (emphasis added). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Quismundo
green
1 sentence2023App. 2d 433, 450 n.7, 523 P.3d 822 (2023) (“[O]ur Supreme Court has made clear that a court’s ‘obligation to follow the law remains the same regardless of the arguments raised by the parties before it.’ ” (quoting State v. Quismundo, 164 Wn.2d 499, 505-06 , 192 P.3d 342 (2008))). 16 No. 83745-1-I/17 have made a difference in the analysis. 7 Indeed, the statute applies to claims arising from a person “having constructed, altered, or repaired any improvement upon real property.” RCW 4.16.300 (emphasis added). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Kelley
green
1 sentence2019Significantly, we distinguished Kelley, 168 Wn.2d 72 , a case that considered "whether imposition-of a firearm enhancement where use of a firearm was an element of the underlying offense violated the double jeopardy prohibition on multiple punishments for the same offense." Allen, 192 Wn.2d at 542. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Baroid Division of Nl Industries, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor
green
1 sentence2017Apr. 20, 1993). 40 SeaWorld of Florida, 748 F.3d at 1215 (quoting Baroid, 660 F.2d at 447 ). 41 Br. of App. at 25. 12 No. 75615-0-1-13 Rain for Rent contends having the manual with the machine would not have made a difference because the warning is for maintenance or chip removal only "in the context of cleaning shavings 'out of pipe ends.'"42 But the manual refers to removing "shavings out of pipe ends and from between thejaws."43 Landdeck was removing plastic shavings from "between the jaws" at the time of the incident. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Sea World of Florida, LLC v. Thomas Perez
green
1 sentence2017Apr. 20, 1993). 40 SeaWorld of Florida, 748 F.3d at 1215 (quoting Baroid, 660 F.2d at 447 ). 41 Br. of App. at 25. 12 No. 75615-0-1-13 Rain for Rent contends having the manual with the machine would not have made a difference because the warning is for maintenance or chip removal only "in the context of cleaning shavings 'out of pipe ends.'"42 But the manual refers to removing "shavings out of pipe ends and from between thejaws."43 Landdeck was removing plastic shavings from "between the jaws" at the time of the incident. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Wade
green
1 sentence2005RAP 9.10; State v. Wade, 138 Wn.2d 460 , 979 P.2d 850 (1999). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Wade
green
1 sentence2005RAP 9.10; State v. Wade, 138 Wn.2d 460 , 979 P.2d 850 (1999). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Parratt v. Taylor
red
2 sentences1997Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 542 , 101 S.Ct. 1908, 1916 , 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981). 1997Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 542 , 101 S.Ct. 1908, 1916 , 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.