6 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1887–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Patel, 24024 (9-17-2008)
green
1 sentence2015Patel, 2008-Ohio-4692, ¶ 47 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Adams
green
2 sentences2013The instructive case regarding inconsistent jury verdicts among multiple counts is State v. Adams, 53 Ohio St.2d 223 , 374 N.E.2d 137 (1978); reversed on other grounds. 2013The instructive case regarding inconsistent jury verdicts among multiple counts is State v. Adams, 53 Ohio St.2d 223 , 374 N.E.2d 137 (1978); reversed on other grounds. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Wilcox
green
1 sentence2009State v. Wilcox (1974), 40 Ohio App.2d 380 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Kansas v. Hendricks
green
2 sentences1997Id. at ___, 117 S.Ct. at 2091 . 1997Id. at ___, 117 S.Ct. at 2091 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Kelley v. Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co.
neutral
1 sentence1940Co., 62 Oh Ap 397 , 29 Abs 100 , we discussed the difference in the test as to when a verdict shall be directed and a motion for new trial shall be sustained as being against the weight of the evidence. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Kilbourne v. Fay
green
1 sentence1887Hanes v. Tiffany, 25 Ohio St. 549 ; Kilbourne v. Fay, 29 Ohio St. 264 ; but no conclusion has been reached, either way, upon this question, by a majority of the court.” With all due deference to Judge Minshall, and his well known learning and ability, I trust I may be allowed to say, that the able court that decided Gill v. Pinney, saw and undertook to declare a difference in principle between the case then before it, and the case where the opposing interest was a' conveyance of the legal title, or of a specific legal lien, acquired from the mortgagor, or by the diligence of the holder; and to | 1 | 1887–1887 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.