Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Fiallo-Lopez
green
2 sentences2020However, an election or unanimity instruction is only required if the State presents evidence of “several distinct acts.” State v. Fiallo-Lopez, 78 Wn. App. 717, 724 , 899 P.2d 1294 (1995). 2020However, an election or unanimity instruction is only required if the State presents evidence of “several distinct acts.” State v. Fiallo-Lopez, 78 Wn. App. 717, 724 , 899 P.2d 1294 (1995). | 2 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Crane
yellow
2 sentences2019“Petrich requires an election or unanimity instruction in cases where evidence supports several criminal acts which would support conviction of a criminal offense.” Crane, 116 Wn.2d at 330 .12 In supplemental briefing, Garcia Gomez asserts his right to due process was violated because the charged alternative means of committing assault in the second degree constitute separate offenses. 2018"Petrich requires an election or unanimity instruction in cases where evidence supports several criminal acts which would support conviction of a criminal offense." Crane, 116 Wn.2d at 330 .12 12(Emphasis in original.) Garcia Gomez also cites State v. Peterson, 168 Wn.2d 763 , 230 P.3d 588 (2010). | 2 | 2018–2019 |
State v. Camarillo
green
2 sentences2007Camarillo, 115 Wash.2d 60 , 794 P.2d 850 . 2007Camarillo, 115 Wn.2d 60 . | 2 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Petrich
red
1 sentence2024Petrich, 101 Wn.2d at 571 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Bobenhouse
green
1 sentence2024State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wn.2d 881, 893 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Bobenhouse
green
1 sentence2024State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wn.2d 881, 893 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Peterson
green
1 sentence2018"Petrich requires an election or unanimity instruction in cases where evidence supports several criminal acts which would support conviction of a criminal offense." Crane, 116 Wn.2d at 330 .12 12(Emphasis in original.) Garcia Gomez also cites State v. Peterson, 168 Wn.2d 763 , 230 P.3d 588 (2010). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Peterson
green
1 sentence2018"Petrich requires an election or unanimity instruction in cases where evidence supports several criminal acts which would support conviction of a criminal offense." Crane, 116 Wn.2d at 330 .12 12(Emphasis in original.) Garcia Gomez also cites State v. Peterson, 168 Wn.2d 763 , 230 P.3d 588 (2010). | 1 | 2018–2018 |