8 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1924–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Floresgreen2 sentences2010See, e.g., State v. Flores, 164 Wash.2d 1, 13 , 186 P.3d 1038 (2008). 2010See, e.g., State v. Flores, 164 Wn.2d 1, 13 , 186 P.3d 1038 (2008). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Floresgreen2 sentences2010See, e.g., State v. Flores, 164 Wash.2d 1, 13 , 186 P.3d 1038 (2008). 2010See, e.g., State v. Flores, 164 Wn.2d 1, 13 , 186 P.3d 1038 (2008). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Griffith v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2011Pierre, 118 Wash.2d 321 , 823 P.2d 492 (1992): "A `new rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions is to be applied retroactively to all cases, state or federal, pending on direct review or not yet final.'" Id. at 326 , 823 P.2d 492 (quoting Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328 , 107 S.Ct. 708 , 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987)). ¶ 19 It is not disputed, nor can there be any doubt, that both Millan and Robinson may therefore receive the retroactive benefit of the rules announced in Gant and Patton. 2011Pierre, 118 Wash.2d 321 , 823 P.2d 492 (1992): "A `new rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions is to be applied retroactively to all cases, state or federal, pending on direct review or not yet final.'" Id. at 326 , 823 P.2d 492 (quoting Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328 , 107 S.Ct. 708 , 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987)). ¶ 19 It is not disputed, nor can there be any doubt, that both Millan and Robinson may therefore receive the retroactive benefit of the rules announced in Gant and Patton. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Matter of Personal Restraint of St. Pierre
green
2 sentences2011Pierre, 118 Wash.2d 321 , 823 P.2d 492 (1992): "A `new rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions is to be applied retroactively to all cases, state or federal, pending on direct review or not yet final.'" Id. at 326 , 823 P.2d 492 (quoting Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328 , 107 S.Ct. 708 , 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987)). ¶ 19 It is not disputed, nor can there be any doubt, that both Millan and Robinson may therefore receive the retroactive benefit of the rules announced in Gant and Patton. 2011Pierre, 118 Wash.2d 321 , 823 P.2d 492 (1992): "A `new rule for the conduct of criminal prosecutions is to be applied retroactively to all cases, state or federal, pending on direct review or not yet final.'" Id. at 326 , 823 P.2d 492 (quoting Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328 , 107 S.Ct. 708 , 93 L.Ed.2d 649 (1987)). ¶ 19 It is not disputed, nor can there be any doubt, that both Millan and Robinson may therefore receive the retroactive benefit of the rules announced in Gant and Patton. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Parnell
red
2 sentences2001One line, claims the majority, follows the rule in State v. Parnell, 77 Wn.2d 503 , 463 P.2d 134 (1969), the other follows the rule in State v. Latham, 100 Wn.2d 59 , 667 P.2d 56 (1983). 2001One line, claims the majority, follows the rule in State v. Parnell, 77 Wn.2d 503 , 463 P.2d 134 (1969), the other follows the rule in State v. Latham, 100 Wn.2d 59 , 667 P.2d 56 (1983). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Latham
green
2 sentences2001One line, claims the majority, follows the rule in State v. Parnell, 77 Wn.2d 503 , 463 P.2d 134 (1969), the other follows the rule in State v. Latham, 100 Wn.2d 59 , 667 P.2d 56 (1983). 2001One line, claims the majority, follows the rule in State v. Parnell, 77 Wn.2d 503 , 463 P.2d 134 (1969), the other follows the rule in State v. Latham, 100 Wn.2d 59 , 667 P.2d 56 (1983). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Frye v. United States
red
2 sentences1988Normally, this court follows the standard set out in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. 1988Normally, this court follows the standard set out in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Waller v. Smith
neutral
2 sentences1924That being the case, the duty owed toward him was exactly that owed toward the licensee; and that duty and the rule of liability surrounding-same is well established by an almost universal array of authorities.” In Waller v. Smith, 116 Wash. 645 , 200 Pac. 95 , on this question, Judge Fullerton expresses the doctrine of the court as follows: “As between himself and the respondent he was at most a mere licensee, and the respondent’s utmost duty towards him and his property was not to inflict upon him or his property a wilful or wanton injury.” The rule as generally laid down is found in Thompso 1924That being the case, the duty owed toward him was exactly that owed toward the licensee; and that duty and the rule of liability surrounding-same is well established by an almost universal array of authorities.” In Waller v. Smith, 116 Wash. 645 , 200 Pac. 95 , on this question, Judge Fullerton expresses the doctrine of the court as follows: “As between himself and the respondent he was at most a mere licensee, and the respondent’s utmost duty towards him and his property was not to inflict upon him or his property a wilful or wanton injury.” The rule as generally laid down is found in Thompso | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.