follows doctrine in Wisconsin

21 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1932–2024 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (10)

Case	Followed	Cited
Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausaugreen wis · 2003 · cited in 17 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2005–2024 2 sentences 2023"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical Co., 2020 WI 2 , 389 Wis. 2d 669 , 937 N.W.2d 37 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc., 264 Wis. 2d 60, ¶94 ). 2023"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical Co., 2020 WI 2 , 389 Wis. 2d 669 , 937 N.W.2d 37 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc., 264 Wis. 2d 60, ¶94 ).	2	17
State v. Michael R. Luedtkegreen wis · 2015 · cited in 3 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2017–2024 2 sentences 2024"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Emp. 2024"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Emp.	2	3
Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Romanshekgreen wis · 2005 · cited in 2 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 2 sentences 2020"This court follows the doctrine of stare decicis scrupulously because of [its] abiding respect for the rule of law," and "[this] court's decision to depart from precedent is not to be made casually." Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ; see also Progressive N. Ins. v. Romanshek, 2005 WI 67, ¶41 , 281 Wis. 2d 300 , 697 N.W.2d 417 . 2020"This court follows the doctrine of stare decicis scrupulously because of [its] abiding respect for the rule of law," and "[this] court's decision to depart from precedent is not to be made casually." Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ; see also Progressive N. Ins. v. Romanshek, 2005 WI 67, ¶41 , 281 Wis. 2d 300 , 697 N.W.2d 417 .	2	2
State v. Alan S. Johnsongreen wis · 2023 · cited in 3 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2023–2024 2 sentences 2024Ins. of Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); see also State v. Johnson, 2023 WI 39, ¶19 , 407 Wis. 2d 195 , 990 N.W.2d 174 ("We have repeatedly recognized the importance of stare decisis to the rule of law."). 2024Ins. of Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); see also State v. Johnson, 2023 WI 39, ¶19 , 407 Wis. 2d 195 , 990 N.W.2d 174 ("We have repeatedly recognized the importance of stare decisis to the rule of law.").	1	3
State v. Alexandergreen wis · 1997 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Such abstract is not admissible in evidence in any action for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident. § 343.24(1). 14 The holding that preponderance of the evidence is the burden of proof applies only when the prior convictions are not an element of the offense, such as in second offense OWI cases, but not so when the prior convictions become an element of the offense as in some PAC cases where the prior convictions lower the "[p]rohibited alcohol concentration." See Wis. Stat. § 340.01 (46m)(c) ; see also State v. Alexander , 214 Wis. 2d 628 , 640-41, 571 N.W.2d 662 (1997). 15 "This 2018Such abstract is not admissible in evidence in any action for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident. § 343.24(1). 14 The holding that preponderance of the evidence is the burden of proof applies only when the prior convictions are not an element of the offense, such as in second offense OWI cases, but not so when the prior convictions become an element of the offense as in some PAC cases where the prior convictions lower the "[p]rohibited alcohol concentration." See Wis. Stat. § 340.01 (46m)(c) ; see also State v. Alexander , 214 Wis. 2d 628 , 640-41, 571 N.W.2d 662 (1997). 15 "This	1	1
Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commissiongreen scotus · 1991 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 2 sentences 2017"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶ 40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶ 94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) ("Time and time again, this Court has recognized that 'the doctrine of stare decisis is of fundamental importance to the rule of law.' " (quoting Welch v. Texas Dep't of Highways and Public Transp., 483 U.S. 468, 494 (1987) (p 2017See Moran, 284 Wis. 2d 24, ¶47 ("[I]f the testing [at Moran's expense] is done, the circuit court will determine whether or not the results 'support the movant's claim.' Wis. Stat. § 974.07 (9)-(10)."). ¶69 "This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of 35 No. 2015AP202-CR Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) (	1	1
Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public Transportationgreen scotus · 1987 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 2 sentences 2017"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶ 40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶ 94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) ("Time and time again, this Court has recognized that 'the doctrine of stare decisis is of fundamental importance to the rule of law.' " (quoting Welch v. Texas Dep't of Highways and Public Transp., 483 U.S. 468, 494 (1987) (p 2017See Moran, 284 Wis. 2d 24, ¶47 ("[I]f the testing [at Moran's expense] is done, the circuit court will determine whether or not the results 'support the movant's claim.' Wis. Stat. § 974.07 (9)-(10)."). ¶69 "This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of 35 No. 2015AP202-CR Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) (	1	1
State v. Morangreen wis · 2005 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 1 sentence 2017See Moran, 284 Wis. 2d 24, ¶47 ("[I]f the testing [at Moran's expense] is done, the circuit court will determine whether or not the results 'support the movant's claim.' Wis. Stat. § 974.07 (9)-(10)."). ¶69 "This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of 35 No. 2015AP202-CR Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) (	1	1
Minnick v. Mississippigreen scotus · 1990 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 1 sentence 2012See also Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 (1988); Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146, 153 (1990) ("[W]e now hold that when counsel is requested, interrogation must cease, and officials may not reinitiate interrogation without counsel present, whether or not the accused has consulted with his attorney."). ¶ 71.	1	1
Arizona v. Robersongreen scotus · 1988 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 1 sentence 2012See also Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 (1988); Minnick v. Mississippi, 498 U.S. 146, 153 (1990) ("[W]e now hold that when counsel is requested, interrogation must cease, and officials may not reinitiate interrogation without counsel present, whether or not the accused has consulted with his attorney."). ¶ 71.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

Case	Cited	Years
Schultz v. Natwick green wis · 2002 2 sentences 2017See Moran, 284 Wis. 2d 24, ¶47 ("[I]f the testing [at Moran's expense] is done, the circuit court will determine whether or not the results 'support the movant's claim.' Wis. Stat. § 974.07 (9)-(10)."). ¶69 "This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of 35 No. 2015AP202-CR Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) ( 2017See Moran, 284 Wis. 2d 24, ¶47 ("[I]f the testing [at Moran's expense] is done, the circuit court will determine whether or not the results 'support the movant's claim.' Wis. Stat. § 974.07 (9)-(10)."). ¶69 "This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of 35 No. 2015AP202-CR Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) (	2	2017–2023
Chris Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical Company green wis · 2020 2 sentences 2023"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical Co., 2020 WI 2 , 389 Wis. 2d 669 , 937 N.W.2d 37 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc., 264 Wis. 2d 60, ¶94 ). 2023"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical Co., 2020 WI 2 , 389 Wis. 2d 669 , 937 N.W.2d 37 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc., 264 Wis. 2d 60, ¶94 ).	2	2023–2023
State v. Hansen green wis · 2001 2 sentences 2005It is a "longstanding rule that this court 'is bound by its own precedent.'" State v. Hansen, 2001 WI 53, ¶ 52 , 243 Wis. 2d 328 , 627 N.W.2d 195 (Wilcox, J., dissenting) (quoting Rose Manor Realty Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 272 Wis. 339, 346 , 75 N.W.2d 274 (1956)). ¶ 42. 2005It is a "longstanding rule that this court 'is bound by its own precedent.'" State v. Hansen, 2001 WI 53, ¶ 52 , 243 Wis. 2d 328 , 627 N.W.2d 195 (Wilcox, J., dissenting) (quoting Rose Manor Realty Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 272 Wis. 339, 346 , 75 N.W.2d 274 (1956)). ¶ 42.	1	2005–2005
Rose Manor Realty Co. v. City of Milwaukee green wis · 1956 2 sentences 2005It is a "longstanding rule that this court 'is bound by its own precedent.'" State v. Hansen, 2001 WI 53, ¶ 52 , 243 Wis. 2d 328 , 627 N.W.2d 195 (Wilcox, J., dissenting) (quoting Rose Manor Realty Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 272 Wis. 339, 346 , 75 N.W.2d 274 (1956)). ¶ 42. 2005It is a "longstanding rule that this court 'is bound by its own precedent.'" State v. Hansen, 2001 WI 53, ¶ 52 , 243 Wis. 2d 328 , 627 N.W.2d 195 (Wilcox, J., dissenting) (quoting Rose Manor Realty Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 272 Wis. 339, 346 , 75 N.W.2d 274 (1956)). ¶ 42.	1	2005–2005
State v. Poellinger green wis · 1990 2 sentences 1994Wyss has been overruled by State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d 493 , 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). 1994Wyss has been overruled by State v. Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d 493 , 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990).	1	1994–1994
State v. Wyss green wis · 1985 2 sentences 1994This standard follows the test articulated in State v. Wyss, 124 Wis. 2d 681 , 370 N.W.2d 745 (1985), in circumstantial evidence cases. 1994This standard follows the test articulated in State v. Wyss, 124 Wis. 2d 681 , 370 N.W.2d 745 (1985), in circumstantial evidence cases.	1	1994–1994
Niske v. Nackman green wis · 1956 2 sentences 1979This finding will not be set aside on appeal unless it is contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence or unless, although labeled a finding, it is essentially an erroneous conclusion of law. 3 This court follows the rule that: “A broker employed to ‘procure a purchase’ for real estate is entitled to his commission when he produces a 586 person ready, willing, and able to purchase upon the terms specified by the owner in the brokerage contract.” Niske v. Nackman, 273 Wis. 69, 75 , 76 N.W.2d 591 (1956). 1979This finding will not be set aside on appeal unless it is contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence or unless, although labeled a finding, it is essentially an erroneous conclusion of law. 3 This court follows the rule that: “A broker employed to ‘procure a purchase’ for real estate is entitled to his commission when he produces a 586 person ready, willing, and able to purchase upon the terms specified by the owner in the brokerage contract.” Niske v. Nackman, 273 Wis. 69, 75 , 76 N.W.2d 591 (1956).	1	1979–1979
Cleary v. Eckart green wis · 1926 2 sentences 1932This follows from the rule-of this court in Cleary v. Eckart, 191 Wis. 114 , 210 N. W. 267 , and Waters v. Markham, 204 Wis. 332 , 235 N. W. 797 , wherein it was held in effect that the guest assumes the risk of accidents occurring through defective condition of the car unless the host knew, or ought to have known, of that condition and failed to inform the guest of it. 1932This follows from the rule-of this court in Cleary v. Eckart, 191 Wis. 114 , 210 N. W. 267 , and Waters v. Markham, 204 Wis. 332 , 235 N. W. 797 , wherein it was held in effect that the guest assumes the risk of accidents occurring through defective condition of the car unless the host knew, or ought to have known, of that condition and failed to inform the guest of it.	1	1932–1932
Waters v. Markham neutral wis · 1931 2 sentences 1932This follows from the rule-of this court in Cleary v. Eckart, 191 Wis. 114 , 210 N. W. 267 , and Waters v. Markham, 204 Wis. 332 , 235 N. W. 797 , wherein it was held in effect that the guest assumes the risk of accidents occurring through defective condition of the car unless the host knew, or ought to have known, of that condition and failed to inform the guest of it. 1932This follows from the rule-of this court in Cleary v. Eckart, 191 Wis. 114 , 210 N. W. 267 , and Waters v. Markham, 204 Wis. 332 , 235 N. W. 797 , wherein it was held in effect that the guest assumes the risk of accidents occurring through defective condition of the car unless the host knew, or ought to have known, of that condition and failed to inform the guest of it.	1	1932–1932

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WI § Wis. Stat. § 346.65 (6) WI § Wis. Stat. § 346.63 (5) WI § Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 940.25 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 961.16 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 961.20 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 967.055 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 16.047 (3) WI § Wis. Stat. § 20.395 (3) WI § Wis. Stat. § 341.25 (3) WI § Wis. Stat. § 51.20 (3) WI § Wis. Stat. § 806.04 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 21 (1918–2021) WI 21 (1932–2024) MS 20 (1976–2017) OH 15 (1963–2026) OK 13 (1924–2022) ID 11 (1998–2017) TX 11 (1910–2025) CT 9 (1938–2026) AR 9 (1988–2016) PA 9 (1942–2023) FL 9 (1926–2026) OR 8 (1984–2024) WA 8 (1924–2011) MI 8 (1916–2020) RI 8 (1918–2023) LA 7 (1973–2011) DC 7 (1987–2022) NY 6 (1952–2022) IL 6 (1955–2026) MT 5 (1976–2008) WV 5 (1983–2012) WY 5 (1924–2010) MO 5 (1893–2015) SD 4 (1962–2006) AL 4 (1980–2013) NC 4 (1911–2023) KS 4 (1958–1992) MD 4 (1968–2025) ME 3 (2005–2011) MA 3 (1936–2002) VA 3 (1991–2015) IN 3 (1969–2017) ND 2 (1920–2014) GA 2 (1976–2012) NV 2 (2017–2017) AZ 2 (1969–2013) NE 2 (1919–1936) TN 2 (1942–1997)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check