Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Quaalegreen2 sentences2023Pine points us to State v. Quaale¸ where the Supreme Court held that it was improper to admit a trooper’s testimony that, based solely on a horizontal gaze nystagmus test, there was “‘no doubt’” “the defendant was impaired.” 182 Wn.2d 191, 198 , 340 P.3d 213 (2014). 2023Pine points us to State v. Quaale¸ where the Supreme Court held that it was improper to admit a trooper’s testimony that, based solely on a horizontal gaze nystagmus test, there was “‘no doubt’” “the defendant was impaired.” 182 Wn.2d 191, 198 , 340 P.3d 213 (2014). | 1 | 4 |
State v. Murphygreen1 sentence1994Murphy , at 156, noted "the principal obstacle to the admissibility of the horizontal gaze nystagmus test may be its pretentiously scientific name". | 1 | 1 |
State v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1994See State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 , 60 A.L.R.4th 1103 (1986) and State v. Bresson, 51 Ohio St. 3d 123 , 554 N.E.2d 1330 (1990) regarding admissibility of the horizontal gaze nystagmus test. 1994See State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 , 60 A.L.R.4th 1103 (1986) and State v. Bresson, 51 Ohio St. 3d 123 , 554 N.E.2d 1330 (1990) regarding admissibility of the horizontal gaze nystagmus test. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bressongreen2 sentences1994See State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 , 60 A.L.R.4th 1103 (1986) and State v. Bresson, 51 Ohio St. 3d 123 , 554 N.E.2d 1330 (1990) regarding admissibility of the horizontal gaze nystagmus test. 1994See State v. Superior Court, 149 Ariz. 269 , 718 P.2d 171 , 60 A.L.R.4th 1103 (1986) and State v. Bresson, 51 Ohio St. 3d 123 , 554 N.E.2d 1330 (1990) regarding admissibility of the horizontal gaze nystagmus test. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Baity
green
1 sentence2025State v. Baity, 140 Wn.2d 1, 14-15 , 991 P.2d 1151 (2000). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Baity
green
1 sentence2025State v. Baity, 140 Wn.2d 1, 14-15 , 991 P.2d 1151 (2000). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Quaale
neutral
1 sentence2021App. 603, 607-08 , 312 P.3d 726 (2013), aff’d, 182 Wn.2d 191 , 340 P.3d 213 (2014), an officer testified that the defendant was impaired based on the results of a horizontal gaze nystagmus test. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences2016First, in the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, 1 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. 2016First, in the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, 1 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.