invitation defense (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

invitation defense in Washington

8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1961–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Arbee v. Collinsgreen
gactapp · 1995 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002In essence, “[a] tenant’s guest may not proceed at will to a part of the premises wholly disconnected to the purpose of the invitation and use the invitation as a defense to a charge of criminal trespass.” Arbee v. Collins, 219 Ga. App. 63 , 463 S.E.2d 922, 925-26 (1995).

2002In essence, “[a] tenant’s guest may not proceed at will to a part of the premises wholly disconnected to the purpose of the invitation and use the invitation as a defense to a charge of criminal trespass.” Arbee v. Collins, 219 Ga. App. 63 , 463 S.E.2d 922, 925-26 (1995).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Marshall Dwayne Hughes v. United States green
ca6 · 2001
2 sentences

2015The Sixth Circuit noted that defense counsel "did challenge two other jurors for cause, and declined the court's invitation to challenge additional jurors." Also, at the close of evidence, "Hughes answered affirmatively when asked by the district court if he was satisfied with his counsel's representation up to that point." Hughes, 258 F.3d at 456 .

2015The Sixth Circuit noted that defense counsel “did challenge two other jurors for cause, and declined the court’s invitation to challenge additional jurors.” Also, at the close of evidence, “Hughes answered affirmatively when asked by the district court if he was satisfied with his counsel’s representation up to that point.” Hughes, 258 F.3d at 456 . ¶21 The court acknowledged that the adequacy of voir dire is not easily subject to appellate review.

22015–2015
Konick v. Champneys green
· 1919
2 sentences

2002Cf. Konick v. Champneys, 108 Wash. 35, 41 , 183 P. 75 (1919) (owner of apartment house may reasonably limit access of tenants’ guests in common areas).

2002Cf. Konick v. Champneys, 108 Wash. 35, 41 , 183 P. 75 (1919) (owner of apartment house may reasonably limit access of tenants’ guests in common areas).

22002–2002
Dowd v. Portsmouth Hospital green
nh · 1963
2 sentences

1966In applying the invitation test in Dowd v. Portsmouth Hospital, 105 N.H. 53, 58 , 193 A.2d 788 , 95 A.L.R.2d 986 (1963), the court, on rehearing, remarked: ■ - , _ Perhaps the most significant support for the invitation test appears in Restatement (Second), Torts, s. 332 (Tentative draft No. 5, 1960).

1966In applying the invitation test in Dowd v. Portsmouth Hospital, 105 N.H. 53, 58 , 193 A.2d 788 , 95 A.L.R.2d 986 (1963), the court, on rehearing, remarked: *651 Perhaps the most significant support for the invitation test appears in Restatement (Second), Torts, s. 332 (Tentative draft No. 5, 1960).

21966–1966
City of Bremerton v. Widell green
wash · 2002
1 sentence

2017City of Bremerton v. Widell, 146 Wn.2d 561, 570-73 , 51 P.3d 733 (2002) (holding a tenant’s invitation overcomes an objection by a landlord such that a tenant’s invitation is a defense to criminal trespass).

12017–2017
City of Bremerton v. Widell green
wash · 2002
1 sentence

2017City of Bremerton v. Widell, 146 Wn.2d 561, 570-73 , 51 P.3d 733 (2002) (holding a tenant’s invitation overcomes an objection by a landlord such that a tenant’s invitation is a defense to criminal trespass).

12017–2017
Spears & Leonard v. Lawrence green
wash · 1894
1 sentence

1961Co., 10 Allen 368 , 373-374, 87 Am.

11961–1961

Where else courts name it

OR 9 (1977–2025) FL 9 (1968–2003) WA 8 (1961–2017) IN 8 (1991–2013) TX 7 (1974–2015) CA 7 (1959–2026) NJ 4 (1902–1996) IL 4 (2018–2023) ID 2 (1988–2024) WI 2 (1993–2003) MD 2 (1967–1988) NY 2 (1962–2005) MA 2 (1953–1977) OH 2 (2006–2021) MI 2 (1991–1993) VA 2 (1992–1996)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check