Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Zerbinos v. Lewisgreen2 sentences1996Myers v. Robertson, 891 P.2d 199, 208 (Alaska 1995); Zerbinos v. Lewis, 394 P.2d 886, 889-90 (Alaska 1964). 1983First, “There is no doubt that appellant has the burden of proving both error and prejudice,” citing Zerbinos v. Lewis, 394 P.2d 886, 889-90 (Alaska 1964). | 5 | 5 |
Poulin v. Zartmangreen2 sentences1991See Poulin v. Zartman, 542 P.2d 251, 261 (Alaska 1975); Zerbinos v. Lewis, 394 P.2d 886, 889-90 (Alaska 1964). 1982Poulin v. Zartman, 542 P.2d 251, 261 (Alaska 1975), on rehearing, 548 P.2d 1299 (1976); Zerbinos v. Lewis, 394 P.2d 886, 889-90 (Alaska 1964); Alaska R.Civ.P. 61. 6 As we stated in Love v. State, 457 P.2d 622 , 631 n.15 (Alaska 1969): “ ‘[T]he members of this court must necessarily put themselves, as nearly as possible, in the position of the jury in order to determine whether, as reasonable men, the error committed probably affected their verdict.’ ” (quoting State v. Dutton, 318 P.2d 667, 671 (Ariz.1957)). | 2 | 2 |
Marron v. Stromstadgreen1 sentence2022And the trial court, having been in the courtroom with the jurors, was in the best position to determine the prejudice caused by its own error, which it corrected in a reasonable exercise of discretion.50 49 See Marron v. Stromstad, 123 P.3d 992, 1011 (Alaska 2005) (noting that “party requesting a new trial [based on evidence-related error] has the burden of proving both error and prejudice” and that we have “great reluctance to interfere with a [trial] court’s decision to deny a new trial”). | 1 | 1 |
Norris v. Norrisgreen1 sentence2017The party alleging error “bears the burden of proving both error and harm.” Id. at 653 . 9 Norris v. Norris, 345 P.3d 924, 928 (Alaska 2015) (“We review the superior court’s procedural decisions for abuse of discretion.”). 10 The judge explained to Patterson that “it’s appropriate to talk to released jurors.” Likewise, the Alaska Bar Association, in its response to an attorney grievance filed by Patterson, explained that “interview[ing] jurors after their discharge” is “a common practice of trial attorneys” and does not constitute “improper conduct” or “jury (continued...) -3- 1657 4. | 1 | 1 |
Myers v. Robertsongreen1 sentence1996Myers v. Robertson, 891 P.2d 199, 208 (Alaska 1995); Zerbinos v. Lewis, 394 P.2d 886, 889-90 (Alaska 1964). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Duttongreen1 sentence1982Poulin v. Zartman, 542 P.2d 251, 261 (Alaska 1975), on rehearing, 548 P.2d 1299 (1976); Zerbinos v. Lewis, 394 P.2d 886, 889-90 (Alaska 1964); Alaska R.Civ.P. 61. 6 As we stated in Love v. State, 457 P.2d 622 , 631 n.15 (Alaska 1969): “ ‘[T]he members of this court must necessarily put themselves, as nearly as possible, in the position of the jury in order to determine whether, as reasonable men, the error committed probably affected their verdict.’ ” (quoting State v. Dutton, 318 P.2d 667, 671 (Ariz.1957)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Frontier Companies of Alaska, Inc. v. Jack White Co.
green
1 sentence2017The party alleging error “bears the burden of proving both error and harm.” Id. at 653 . 9 Norris v. Norris, 345 P.3d 924, 928 (Alaska 2015) (“We review the superior court’s procedural decisions for abuse of discretion.”). 10 The judge explained to Patterson that “it’s appropriate to talk to released jurors.” Likewise, the Alaska Bar Association, in its response to an attorney grievance filed by Patterson, explained that “interview[ing] jurors after their discharge” is “a common practice of trial attorneys” and does not constitute “improper conduct” or “jury (continued...) -3- 1657 4. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Poulin v. Zartman
green
1 sentence1982Poulin v. Zartman, 542 P.2d 251, 261 (Alaska 1975), on rehearing, 548 P.2d 1299 (1976); Zerbinos v. Lewis, 394 P.2d 886, 889-90 (Alaska 1964); Alaska R.Civ.P. 61. 6 As we stated in Love v. State, 457 P.2d 622 , 631 n.15 (Alaska 1969): “ ‘[T]he members of this court must necessarily put themselves, as nearly as possible, in the position of the jury in order to determine whether, as reasonable men, the error committed probably affected their verdict.’ ” (quoting State v. Dutton, 318 P.2d 667, 671 (Ariz.1957)). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Love v. State
green
1 sentence1982Poulin v. Zartman, 542 P.2d 251, 261 (Alaska 1975), on rehearing, 548 P.2d 1299 (1976); Zerbinos v. Lewis, 394 P.2d 886, 889-90 (Alaska 1964); Alaska R.Civ.P. 61. 6 As we stated in Love v. State, 457 P.2d 622 , 631 n.15 (Alaska 1969): “ ‘[T]he members of this court must necessarily put themselves, as nearly as possible, in the position of the jury in order to determine whether, as reasonable men, the error committed probably affected their verdict.’ ” (quoting State v. Dutton, 318 P.2d 667, 671 (Ariz.1957)). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.