Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1848–1960 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Doe ex dem. Evers v. Matthewsgreen2 sentences1960Said decree is not of- . fered as a muniment of title, and the-regularity or legal sufficiency of said! decree and said sale to- pass title is not admitted. * * * ” (Emphasis supplied.) 192 Ala. 181, 182, 183 , 68 So. 182, 183 . 1960Said decree is not of- . fered as a muniment of title, and the-regularity or legal sufficiency of said! decree and said sale to- pass title is not admitted. * * * ” (Emphasis supplied.) 192 Ala. 181, 182, 183 , 68 So. 182, 183 . | 1 | 1 |
Alabama Power Co. v. Talmadgegreen2 sentences1941It was there observed: “At the time of filing the bill and up to the trial, Marie N. Potts was a member of the respondent partnership, and the matters alluded to were important evidentiary facts in the keeping of the cross-complainant, the failure to produce which, or to account for their absence, casts suspicion on the bona fides of her claim.” Citing Blue v. First National Bank, supra, and Carter v. Chambers, supra. This doctrine was reiterated and applied in Alabama Power Co. et al. v. Talmadge, 207 Ala. 86, 95, 96 , 93 So. 548, 557 , in justifying argument to the jury, that a failure of a 1941It was there observed: “At the time of filing the bill and up to the trial, Marie N. Potts was a member of the respondent partnership, and the matters alluded to were important evidentiary facts in the keeping of the cross-complainant, the failure to produce which, or to account for their absence, casts suspicion on the bona fides of her claim.” Citing Blue v. First National Bank, supra, and Carter v. Chambers, supra. This doctrine was reiterated and applied in Alabama Power Co. et al. v. Talmadge, 207 Ala. 86, 95, 96 , 93 So. 548, 557 , in justifying argument to the jury, that a failure of a | 1 | 1 |
Doe ex dem. Holt v. Adamsgreen2 sentences1913The bona fides of this claim on the part of defendant and his privies in possession was under the evidence a jury question, resting in debatable inference, and should have been submitted to the jury by the trial court as an essential prerequisite to the adverseness and efficiency of their possession. — Holt v. Adams, 121 Ala. 664, 669, 670 , 25 South. 716 . 1913The bona fides of this claim on the part of defendant and his privies in possession was under the evidence a jury question, resting in debatable inference, and should have been submitted to the jury by the trial court as an essential prerequisite to the adverseness and efficiency of their possession. — Holt v. Adams, 121 Ala. 664, 669, 670 , 25 South. 716 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Carter v. Chambers
green
2 sentences1941It was there observed: “At the time of filing the bill and up to the trial, Marie N. Potts was a member of the respondent partnership, and the matters alluded to were important evidentiary facts in the keeping of the cross-complainant, the failure to produce which, or to account for their absence, casts suspicion on the bona fides of her claim.” Citing Blue v. First National Bank, supra, and Carter v. Chambers, supra. This doctrine was reiterated and applied in Alabama Power Co. et al. v. Talmadge, 207 Ala. 86, 95, 96 , 93 So. 548, 557 , in justifying argument to the jury, that a failure of a 1920Blue v. First National Bank, supra; Carter v. Chambers, 79 Ala. 223 -231. it is a conceded fact that S. J. | 2 | 1920–1941 |
Ray v. Watkins
neutral
1 sentence1920Ray v. Watkins, 85 South. 25 . 2 From a careful inspection of the evidence, we are of opinion that the decree from which the appeal is. prosecuted is erroneous. . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Maples v. State
green
2 sentences1920Maples v. State, 203 Ala. 153 , 82 South. 183 . [1, 2] It is not enough for the intervener or claimant to show that the use to which the vehicle was put was without his knowledge ■or consent, or the knoioledge or consent of those under whom he claims. 1920Maples v. State, 203 Ala. 153 , 82 South. 183 . [1, 2] It is not enough for the intervener or claimant to show that the use to which the vehicle was put was without his knowledge ■or consent, or the knoioledge or consent of those under whom he claims. | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Newsom v. State
green
1 sentence1899In this event, the secrecy or publicity of the act might be material in determining the bona fides of the claim and consequently the criminality of the act. — Newsom v. The State, 107 Ala. 133 ; Postal Tel. | 1 | 1899–1899 |
Postal Telegraph Co. v. Lenoir
neutral
1 sentence1899Co. v. Lenoir, 107 Ala. 640; Russell v. Irby, 13 Ala. 131 . 8. | 1 | 1899–1899 |
Russell v. Irby
neutral
1 sentence1899Co. v. Lenoir, 107 Ala. 640; Russell v. Irby, 13 Ala. 131 . 8. | 1 | 1899–1899 |
Snodgrass v. Branch Bank at Decatur
neutral
1 sentence1899If the color of title offered in evidence by the defendants was procured by fraud with, which they were connected, then such would tend to impeach the bona fides of their claim of ownership, and if their possession of the land in question was so obtained, and the trees.were cut by them during such possession, then the defense of a bona fide claim of ownership would fail.' — Snodgrass v. Branch Bank of Decatur, 25 Ala. 161 . | 1 | 1899–1899 |
Rutledge's Adm'r v. Townsend, Crane & Co.
neutral
1 sentence1887To uphold a promise to pay money, there must be a benefit to the promisor, or' a detriment to the promisee. — Rutledge v. Townsend, 38 Ala. 706 . | 1 | 1887–1887 |
Wier v. Davis
green
1 sentence1848In Weir v. Davis & Humphries, 4 Ala. Rep. 442 , the rule laid down in Brown v. Lipscomb is explained, and enforced, and it is held, that, although a purchaser of a slave from an administratrix at private sale, took no title, yet having bona fide purchased, and paid for the slave, it was not, while in his possession, subject to be levied on by execution against the estate, which the seller represented. £< The sale,” it is said, ££ is illegal, and passes no title, yet the purchase money was received, and appropriated by the administratrix, in due course of administration. | 1 | 1848–1848 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.