Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gulf Atlantic Life Ins. Co. v. Barnesgreen2 sentences2002Co. v. Barnes , 405 So.2d 916 (Ala. 1981).' Thomas , 566 So.2d at 741 . 2002Co. v. Barnes, 405 So.2d 916 (Ala.1981).' Thomas, 566 So.2d at 741 . | 1 | 5 |
Edgar v. Stategreen2 sentences2009See Edgar v. State, 646 So.2d 683 (Ala.1994). 2009See Edgar v. State, 646 So.2d 683 (Ala.1994). | 1 | 1 |
Loyal American Life Ins. v. Mattiacegreen2 sentences1996In my opinion, this should not be the analysis undertaken by a judge when determining whether an insurer can be held liable for "bad faith." [7] That the Court has modified the Chavers test is shown by its holding in this case that "the trial court need not expressly direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on a breach of contract claim in order to submit a bad faith claim to the jury," and that "[t]he trial court must simply determine that the plaintiff has met the standard of proof required for a directed verdict." 679 So.2d at 235 (n. 2). 1996In my opinion, this should not be the analysis undertaken by a judge when determining whether an insurer can be held liable for "bad faith." [7] That the Court has modified the Chavers test is shown by its holding in this case that "the trial court need not expressly direct a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on a breach of contract claim in order to submit a bad faith claim to the jury," and that "[t]he trial court must simply determine that the plaintiff has met the standard of proof required for a directed verdict." 679 So.2d at 235 (n. 2). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thomas v. Principal Financial Group
green
2 sentences2002Co. v. Barnes , 405 So.2d 916 (Ala. 1981).' Thomas , 566 So.2d at 741 . 2002Co. v. Barnes, 405 So.2d 916 (Ala.1981).' Thomas, 566 So.2d at 741 . | 2 | 1999–2002 |
Vinnie v. State
green
2 sentences2009See, e.g., Thomas v. State, 43 So.2d 1288 (Ala.Crim.App. 2007); Vinnie v. State, 866 So.2d 1175 (Ala.Crim.App.2002). 2009See, e.g., Thomas v. State, 43 So.2d 1288 (Ala.Crim.App.2007); Vinnie v. State, 866 So.2d 1175 (Ala.Crim.App.2002). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Beasley v. State
green
2 sentences2009Juror no. 216 was not asked about, and he offered no explanation for, the discrepancy between the South Eighth Avenue address listed on the master jury roll and the Tatum Avenue address he testified to during the hearing on the motion for a new trial.” “2 Steading does not argue that Keibler-Thompson did not act with due diligence in discovering juror no. 138’s alleged disqualification. “3 In Beasley v. State, the Court of Appeals recognized that the appellant’s counsel and the court were misled by the juror’s failure to respond. 39 Ala. App. 182 , 96 So.2d 693 (1957). 2009Juror no. 216 was not asked about, and he offered no explanation for, the discrepancy between the South Eighth Avenue address listed on the master jury roll and the Tatum Avenue address he testified to during the hearing on the motion for a new trial.” “2 Steading does not argue that Keibler-Thompson did not act with due diligence in discovering juror no. 138’s alleged disqualification. “3 In Beasley v. State, the Court of Appeals recognized that the appellant’s counsel and the court were misled by the juror’s failure to respond. 39 Ala. App. 182 , 96 So.2d 693 (1957). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.