Enmund culpability requirement (Arizona) · Go Syfert
← Arizona issues

Enmund culpability requirement in Arizona

7 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Tison v. Arizonagreen
scotus · 1987 · cited in 7 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 1989–2003
2 sentences

2003Five years later, in Tison , the Court refined its prior decision by holding that "major participation in the felony committed, combined with reckless indifference to human life, is sufficient to satisfy the Enmund culpability requirement." 481 U.S. at 158 , 107 S.Ct. at 1688 . ¶ 99 The Supreme Court already has addressed the question whether a jury must make Enmund-Tison findings.

2003Five years later, in Tison , the Court refined its prior decision by holding that "major participation in the felony committed, combined with reckless indifference to human life, is sufficient to satisfy the Enmund culpability requirement." 481 U.S. at 158 , 107 S.Ct. at 1688 . ¶ 99 The Supreme Court already has addressed the question whether a jury must make Enmund-Tison findings.

17

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Cabana v. Bullock green
scotus · 1986
2 sentences

2003In Cabana v. Bullock, the Court held that the federal constitution does not require a jury to determine a defendant's level of culpability in capital felony murder cases. 474 U.S. 376, 385 , 106 S.Ct. 689, 696 , 88 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).

2003In Cabana v. Bullock, the Court held that the federal constitution does not require a jury to determine a defendant's level of culpability in capital felony murder cases. 474 U.S. 376, 385 , 106 S.Ct. 689, 696 , 88 L.Ed.2d 704 (1986).

12003–2003

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-703 (7) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-4031 (5) AZ § Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-1105 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 39 (1995–2026) FL 15 (1987–2018) MS 9 (1992–2018) AZ 7 (1989–2003) IN 6 (1989–2000) NC 5 (1996–2024) NV 4 (1991–2002) IL 4 (1988–1995) TN 3 (2000–2016) TX 3 (1989–2008) SD 3 (2002–2006) MT 2 (1990–1996) SC 2 (1993–1999) GA 2 (2013–2020) IA 2 (2018–2018) NE 2 (1995–1998)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check