Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 California opinions name it 3 courts 1933–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Tolbertgreen2 sentences2016Even assuming a demurrer to a felony complaint generally must be made prior to the preliminary hearing, this does not change our analysis, as a defendant can demur to the information. (§§ 691, 1004; see also Tolbert, supra, 176 Cal.App.3d at p. 690 , 222 Cal.Rptr. 313 .) Defendants, however, claim failure to demur to the complaint constitutes waiver, relying on section 1012. 2016Even assuming a demurrer to a felony complaint generally must be made prior to the preliminary hearing, this does not change our analysis, as a defendant can demur to the information. (§§ 691, 1004; see also Tolbert, supra, 176 Cal.App.3d at p. 690 , 222 Cal.Rptr. 313 .) Defendants, however, claim failure to demur to the complaint constitutes waiver, relying on section 1012. | 3 | 3 |
Carrasco v. Craftgreen1 sentence2025Generally, when a complaint is amended, “judgment by default may be taken against the defendant if he fails to file a new or amended answer or plea within the time allowed therefor, notwithstanding the original answer or plea is still on file.” (Gray v. Hall (1928) 203 Cal. 306 , 310–311 (Gray).) As an exception to this rule, “entry of a default in a case where the original answer can stand as an answer to the amended complaint constitutes error.” (Carrasco v. Craft (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 796, 809 (Carrasco).) Nicholson has failed to make any argument why this exception would apply here. | 1 | 1 |
Carsten v. Psychology Examining Committeegreen2 sentences2002(Cf. Carsten v. Psychology Examining Com. (1980) 27 Cal.3d 793, 799-802 , 166 Cal.Rptr. 844 , 614 P.2d 276 .) Even assuming that the type of conduct alleged in the complaint constitutes a violation of the free speech clause by defendants, we conclude that money damages simply are not an appropriate remedy. 2002(Cf. Carsten v. Psychology Examining Com. (1980) 27 Cal.3d 793, 799-802 , 166 Cal.Rptr. 844 , 614 P.2d 276 .) Even assuming that the type of conduct alleged in the complaint constitutes a violation of the free speech clause by defendants, we conclude that money damages simply are not an appropriate remedy. | 1 | 1 |
Gregory v. City of Chicagogreen2 sentences1969(See Gregory v. Chicago (1969) 394 U.S. 111, 112 [ 22 L.Ed.2d 134, 136 , 89 S.Ct. 946 ]; Burton v. Municipal Court (1968) 68 Cal.2d 684, 696 [ 68 Cal.Rptr. 721 , 441 P.2d 281 ].) The text of the leaflet, augmented by what appears to be a picture of President Johnson, is as follows: “Get the Man Off Your Back [picture] Let’s get our stuff together and end the draft. 1969(See Gregory v. Chicago (1969) 394 U.S. 111, 112 [ 22 L.Ed.2d 134, 136 , 89 S.Ct. 946 ]; Burton v. Municipal Court (1968) 68 Cal.2d 684, 696 [ 68 Cal.Rptr. 721 , 441 P.2d 281 ].) The text of the leaflet, augmented by what appears to be a picture of President Johnson, is as follows: “Get the Man Off Your Back [picture] Let’s get our stuff together and end the draft. | 1 | 1 |
Burton v. Municipal Courtgreen2 sentences1969(See Gregory v. Chicago (1969) 394 U.S. 111, 112 [ 22 L.Ed.2d 134, 136 , 89 S.Ct. 946 ]; Burton v. Municipal Court (1968) 68 Cal.2d 684, 696 [ 68 Cal.Rptr. 721 , 441 P.2d 281 ].) The text of the leaflet, augmented by what appears to be a picture of President Johnson, is as follows: “Get the Man Off Your Back [picture] Let’s get our stuff together and end the draft. 1969(See Gregory v. Chicago (1969) 394 U.S. 111, 112 [ 22 L.Ed.2d 134, 136 , 89 S.Ct. 946 ]; Burton v. Municipal Court (1968) 68 Cal.2d 684, 696 [ 68 Cal.Rptr. 721 , 441 P.2d 281 ].) The text of the leaflet, augmented by what appears to be a picture of President Johnson, is as follows: “Get the Man Off Your Back [picture] Let’s get our stuff together and end the draft. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gray v. Hall
green
1 sentence2025Generally, when a complaint is amended, “judgment by default may be taken against the defendant if he fails to file a new or amended answer or plea within the time allowed therefor, notwithstanding the original answer or plea is still on file.” (Gray v. Hall (1928) 203 Cal. 306 , 310–311 (Gray).) As an exception to this rule, “entry of a default in a case where the original answer can stand as an answer to the amended complaint constitutes error.” (Carrasco v. Craft (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 796, 809 (Carrasco).) Nicholson has failed to make any argument why this exception would apply here. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Pain v. Municipal Court
green
2 sentences1969(See Pain v. Municipal Court (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 151 [ 73 Cal.Rptr. 862 ].) No opinion is expressed as to whether the conduct reflected by the crime report attached to the complaint constitutes a violation of any of the foregoing provisions, or, if so, whether any such provision may constitutionally be applied to such conduct. 1969(See Pain v. Municipal Court (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 151 [ 73 Cal.Rptr. 862 ].) No opinion is expressed as to whether the conduct reflected by the crime report attached to the complaint constitutes a violation of any of the foregoing provisions, or, if so, whether any such provision may constitutionally be applied to such conduct. | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Young v. Rosenbaum
neutral
1 sentence1933In the recent case of Associated Oil Co. v. Mullin, 110 Cal. App. 385 [ 294 Pac. 421 ], the law in relation to the questions which we are considering is so fully and conclusively set forth that we quote therefrom the following as decisive in this case: “It is essential to jurisdiction that there be some proper application invoking the judicial power of the court in respect to the matters sought to be litigated (Young v. Rosenbaum, 39 Cal. 646 ; Tinn v. United States District Attorney, 148 Cal. 773 [ 113 Am. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Associated Oil Co. v. Mullin
green
2 sentences1933In the recent case of Associated Oil Co. v. Mullin, 110 Cal. App. 385 [ 294 Pac. 421 ], the law in relation to the questions which we are considering is so fully and conclusively set forth that we quote therefrom the following as decisive in this case: “It is essential to jurisdiction that there be some proper application invoking the judicial power of the court in respect to the matters sought to be litigated (Young v. Rosenbaum, 39 Cal. 646 ; Tinn v. United States District Attorney, 148 Cal. 773 [ 113 Am. 1933In the recent case of Associated Oil Co. v. Mullin, 110 Cal. App. 385 [ 294 Pac. 421 ], the law in relation to the questions which we are considering is so fully and conclusively set forth that we quote therefrom the following as decisive in this case: “It is essential to jurisdiction that there be some proper application invoking the judicial power of the court in respect to the matters sought to be litigated (Young v. Rosenbaum, 39 Cal. 646 ; Tinn v. United States District Attorney, 148 Cal. 773 [ 113 Am. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Tinn v. U.S. District Attorney
green
1 sentence1933In the recent case of Associated Oil Co. v. Mullin, 110 Cal. App. 385 [ 294 Pac. 421 ], the law in relation to the questions which we are considering is so fully and conclusively set forth that we quote therefrom the following as decisive in this case: “It is essential to jurisdiction that there be some proper application invoking the judicial power of the court in respect to the matters sought to be litigated (Young v. Rosenbaum, 39 Cal. 646 ; Tinn v. United States District Attorney, 148 Cal. 773 [ 113 Am. | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.