Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 California opinions name it 2 courts 1942–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Latino Issues Forum v. United States Environmental Protection Agencygreen1 sentence2014Some people will be humiliated. “[Times Attorney]: Some people will be humiliated — •” 16 Both federal and California state courts have explained the essence of this rule by citing singer-songwriter Bob Dylan: “You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.” (Bob Dylan, “Subterranean Homesick Blues,” Columbia Records, 1965; see, e.g., Latino Issues Forum v. U.S. E.P.A. (9th Cir. 2009) 558 F.3d 936, 949 ; Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1001 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 685 , 884 P.2d 142 ].) 17 One might also reasonably infer that if the scores are | 1 | 1 |
Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Centergreen2 sentences2014Some people will be humiliated. “[Times Attorney]: Some people will be humiliated — •” 16 Both federal and California state courts have explained the essence of this rule by citing singer-songwriter Bob Dylan: “You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.” (Bob Dylan, “Subterranean Homesick Blues,” Columbia Records, 1965; see, e.g., Latino Issues Forum v. U.S. E.P.A. (9th Cir. 2009) 558 F.3d 936, 949 ; Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1001 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 685 , 884 P.2d 142 ].) 17 One might also reasonably infer that if the scores are 2014Some people will be humiliated. “[Times Attorney]: Some people will be humiliated — •” 16 Both federal and California state courts have explained the essence of this rule by citing singer-songwriter Bob Dylan: “You don’t need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.” (Bob Dylan, “Subterranean Homesick Blues,” Columbia Records, 1965; see, e.g., Latino Issues Forum v. U.S. E.P.A. (9th Cir. 2009) 558 F.3d 936, 949 ; Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1001 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 685 , 884 P.2d 142 ].) 17 One might also reasonably infer that if the scores are | 1 | 1 |
Lewsadder v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.green2 sentences1976(Id, at p. 713; see fn. 5, supra.) Lewsadder v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc., 36 Cal.App.3d 255, 257 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 405 ], did involve an agreement to arbitrate under NYSE rules, but there it was a registered representative of the broker who resisted arbitration in the face of an Exchange rule—a condition of his employment—that controversies between such representatives and member brokers be arbitrated in accordance with Exchange procedures. 1976(Id, at p. 713; see fn. 5, supra.) Lewsadder v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc., 36 Cal.App.3d 255, 257 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 405 ], did involve an agreement to arbitrate under NYSE rules, but there it was a registered representative of the broker who resisted arbitration in the face of an Exchange rule—a condition of his employment—that controversies between such representatives and member brokers be arbitrated in accordance with Exchange procedures. | 1 | 1 |
Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.green2 sentences1976(See also Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 20 Cal.App.3d 668, 671-672 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 811 ].) In any event, again there was no issue concerning the unfairness of particular Exchange rules concerning arbitration. 1976(See also Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 20 Cal.App.3d 668, 671-672 [ 97 Cal.Rptr. 811 ].) In any event, again there was no issue concerning the unfairness of particular Exchange rules concerning arbitration. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Woodruff
green
1 sentence2024(People v. Woodruff (2018) 5 Cal.5th 697, 770 .) 23 Defendant’s citation of People v. Tatum (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 1125 is inapposite. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Morgain
green
1 sentence2024As the trial court observed, “[i]t is not clear from the record whether McCray ever actually gave the taped statement referenced in Exhibit 42.” 15 The trial court observed that “despite what appears to be the contemplation of a possible grant of immunity by the prosecution, the fact that McCray invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege and did not testify against [Hill] strongly suggests that such an agreement was never consummated.” The court was referring to exhibit 44 to the petition, a page of district attorney notes that includes a January 14, 1986 entry saying “Also, 26 statute, section 132 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Ervin
green
1 sentence2024As the trial court observed, “[i]t is not clear from the record whether McCray ever actually gave the taped statement referenced in Exhibit 42.” 15 The trial court observed that “despite what appears to be the contemplation of a possible grant of immunity by the prosecution, the fact that McCray invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege and did not testify against [Hill] strongly suggests that such an agreement was never consummated.” The court was referring to exhibit 44 to the petition, a page of district attorney notes that includes a January 14, 1986 entry saying “Also, 26 statute, section 132 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Tatum CA2/1
green
1 sentence2024(People v. Woodruff (2018) 5 Cal.5th 697, 770 .) 23 Defendant’s citation of People v. Tatum (2016) 4 Cal.App.5th 1125 is inapposite. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Valdez
green
1 sentence2014People v. Valdez (2004) 32 Cal.4th 73, 125 ),” insert a new final paragraph of Subsection C, as follows: Wentworth argues the prosecutor committed misconduct on redirect examination by stating to the parole officer that when “you say he had [no parole violations] in nine months,” “[y]ou’re obviously not referring to his conduct on the 27[th]; correct?” The parole agent answered, “Correct.” There was no prosecutorial error in this exchange because defense counsel opened the door on cross-examination to this line of inquiry by eliciting that Wentworth had been law- abiding and free of parole vio | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Mercury Casualty Co. v. State Board of Equalization
green
2 sentences2007Co. v. State Board of Equal., supra, 169 Cal.App.2d at pp. 173-174.) Allstate is inapposite to this case because here the installment charges in question are not based on the additional costs incurred by Exchange in offering an installment payment program, but are based solely on the time value of money for use of the option of making payments of premium in installments (i.e., interest on the amount of the unpaid premium balance).* 11 In Williams’s statement of disputed material facts in opposition to Exchange’s motion for summary judgment, she admits it is “[u]ndisputed” that “Exchange’s admi 2007Co. v. State Board of Equal., supra, 169 Cal.App.2d at pp. 173-174.) Allstate is inapposite to this case because here the installment charges in question are not based on the additional costs incurred by Exchange in offering an installment payment program, but are based solely on the time value of money for use of the option of making payments of premium in installments (i.e., interest on the amount of the unpaid premium balance).* 11 In Williams’s statement of disputed material facts in opposition to Exchange’s motion for summary judgment, she admits it is “[u]ndisputed” that “Exchange’s admi | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Holzinger v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
green
2 sentences1942Co. of America, 222 Wis. 456 [ 269 N.W. 306 ].) If it be assumed, as is expressed in the majority opinion, that the requirement that the exchange policy be "for the same amount" is susceptible of the construction that disability benefits could not be added because the amount of the policy would then be different, it certainly cannot be said that such is the only reasonable construction. 1942Co. of America, 222 Wis. 456 [ 269 N.W. 306 ].) If it be assumed, as is expressed in the majority opinion, that the requirement that the exchange policy be "for the same amount" is susceptible of the construction that disability benefits could not be added because the amount of the policy would then be different, it certainly cannot be said that such is the only reasonable construction. | 1 | 1942–1942 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.