Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
57 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1986–2026 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Truelove & MacLean, Inc.green2 sentences2003See Commission on Human Rights Opportunities v. Truelove v. Maclean, Inc. , 238 Conn. 337 , 344 n. 11, 680 A.2d 1261 (1996) (stating that "[w]here an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived"). 2003See Commission on Human Rights Opportunities v. Truelove v. Maclean, Inc. , 238 Conn. 337 , 344 n. 11, 680 A.2d 1261 (1996) (stating that "[w]here an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived"). | 7 | 13 |
Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting Councilgreen2 sentences2026Whe[n] an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting Council, 286 Conn. 57, 87 , 942 A.2d 345 (2008). 2026Whe[n] an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting Council, 286 Conn. 57, 87 , 942 A.2d 345 (2008). | 5 | 13 |
Cummings v. Twin Tool Manufacturing Co.green2 sentences1997See Commission on Human Rights Opportunities v. Truelove Maclean, Inc., 238 Conn. 337 , 344 n. 11, 680 A.2d 1291 (1996) ("Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived"); Cummings v. Twin Tool Manufacturing Co., 40 Conn. App. 36 , 45 , 668 A.2d 1346 (1996) ("Where a claim is asserted in the statement of issues but thereafter receives only cursory attention in the brief without substantive discussion or citation of authorities, it is deemed to be abandoned"). 3 Here, the plaintiff has cited authority addressing the CT 1997See Commission on Human Rights Opportunities v. Truelove Maclean, Inc., 238 Conn. 337 , 344 n. 11, 680 A.2d 1291 (1996) ("Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived"); Cummings v. Twin Tool Manufacturing Co., 40 Conn. App. 36 , 45 , 668 A.2d 1346 (1996) ("Where a claim is asserted in the statement of issues but thereafter receives only cursory attention in the brief without substantive discussion or citation of authorities, it is deemed to be abandoned"). 3 Here, the plaintiff has cited authority addressing the CT | 3 | 3 |
Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunitiesgreen2 sentences2020II The second claim that the plaintiff advances in this appeal is that he did not receive motion #156 by service of process.9 The plaintiff, however, devotes only one sentence, in his thirty page brief, to this claim. ‘‘Claims are . . . inadequately briefed when they . . . consist of conclusory assertions . . . with no mention of rele- vant authority and minimal or no citations from the record . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Estate of Rock v. University of Connecticut, 323 Conn. 26, 33 , 144 A.3d 420 (2016). ‘‘Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare asse 2020II The second claim that the plaintiff advances in this appeal is that he did not receive motion #156 by service of process.9 The plaintiff, however, devotes only one sentence, in his thirty page brief, to this claim. ‘‘Claims are . . . inadequately briefed when they . . . consist of conclusory assertions . . . with no mention of rele- vant authority and minimal or no citations from the record . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Estate of Rock v. University of Connecticut, 323 Conn. 26, 33 , 144 A.3d 420 (2016). ‘‘Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare asse | 2 | 14 |
SS-II, LLC v. Bridge Street Associatesgreen2 sentences2010In addition, mere conclusory assertions regarding a claim, with no mention of relevant authority and minimal or no citations from the record, will not suffice.” [Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.]); or that are raised for the first time in a reply brief; see, e.g., SS-II, LLC v. Bridge Street Associates, 293 Conn. 287, 302 , 977 A.2d 189 (2009) (“[i]t is well established . . . that [c]laims ... are unreviewable when raised for the first time in a reply brief’ [internal quotation marks omitted]); in the present case, we decide the issue because Hasychak and the board have ful 2010In addition, mere conclusory assertions regarding a claim, with no mention of relevant authority and minimal or no citations from the record, will not suffice.” [Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.]); or that are raised for the first time in a reply brief; see, e.g., SS-II, LLC v. Bridge Street Associates, 293 Conn. 287, 302 , 977 A.2d 189 (2009) (“[i]t is well established . . . that [c]laims ... are unreviewable when raised for the first time in a reply brief’ [internal quotation marks omitted]); in the present case, we decide the issue because Hasychak and the board have ful | 2 | 2 |
In re Jeffrey C.green2 sentences2004See, e.g., In re Jeffrey C., 261 Conn. 189 , 197 n.5, 802 A.2d 772 (2002) (“[w]here an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived” [internal quotation marks omitted]). 2004See, e.g., In re Jeffrey C., 261 Conn. 189 , 197 n.5, 802 A.2d 772 (2002) (“[w]here an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived” [internal quotation marks omitted]). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Martinezgreen2 sentences2025Although the defendant’s failure to challenge Recchia’s testimony about his discharge from the Explore program would ordinarily be fatal to his challenge to the admission of that same information via the discharge report; see, e.g., State v. Martinez, 171 Conn. App. 702 , 758 n.20, 158 A.3d 373 (any error in failure to suppress defendant’s written statement to police would have been harmless given that statement was cumulative of other evidence, admission of which defendant did not challenge), cert. denied, 325 Conn. 925 , 160 A.3d 1067 (2017); we nevertheless address his claim regarding the a 2025Although the defendant’s failure to challenge Recchia’s testimony about his discharge from the Explore program would ordinarily be fatal to his challenge to the admission of that same information via the discharge report; see, e.g., State v. Martinez, 171 Conn. App. 702 , 758 n.20, 158 A.3d 373 (any error in failure to suppress defendant’s written statement to police would have been harmless given that statement was cumulative of other evidence, admission of which defendant did not challenge), cert. denied, 325 Conn. 925 , 160 A.3d 1067 (2017); we nevertheless address his claim regarding the a | 1 | 1 |
State v. Martinezgreen2 sentences2025Although the defendant’s failure to challenge Recchia’s testimony about his discharge from the Explore program would ordinarily be fatal to his challenge to the admission of that same information via the discharge report; see, e.g., State v. Martinez, 171 Conn. App. 702 , 758 n.20, 158 A.3d 373 (any error in failure to suppress defendant’s written statement to police would have been harmless given that statement was cumulative of other evidence, admission of which defendant did not challenge), cert. denied, 325 Conn. 925 , 160 A.3d 1067 (2017); we nevertheless address his claim regarding the a 2025Although the defendant’s failure to challenge Recchia’s testimony about his discharge from the Explore program would ordinarily be fatal to his challenge to the admission of that same information via the discharge report; see, e.g., State v. Martinez, 171 Conn. App. 702 , 758 n.20, 158 A.3d 373 (any error in failure to suppress defendant’s written statement to police would have been harmless given that statement was cumulative of other evidence, admission of which defendant did not challenge), cert. denied, 325 Conn. 925 , 160 A.3d 1067 (2017); we nevertheless address his claim regarding the a | 1 | 1 |
Macdermid, Inc. v. Leonettigreen2 sentences2022Bongiorno v. J & G Realty, LLC, 211 Conn. App. 311 , 323, 272 A.3d 700 (2022) (‘‘[when] an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also MacDermid, Inc. v. Leonetti, 328 Conn. 726, 748 , 183 A.3d 611 (2018) (‘‘[w]e are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inade- quate brief’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)). 2022Bongiorno v. J & G Realty, LLC, 211 Conn. App. 311 , 323, 272 A.3d 700 (2022) (‘‘[when] an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)); see also MacDermid, Inc. v. Leonetti, 328 Conn. 726, 748 , 183 A.3d 611 (2018) (‘‘[w]e are not required to review issues that have been improperly presented to this court through an inade- quate brief’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
Rosenberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen1 sentence2020See Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecti- cut Siting Council, 286 Conn. 57, 87 , 942 A.2d 245 (2008) (noting that when ‘‘issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)). | 1 | 1 |
| Commissioner of Health Services v. Youth Challenge of Greater Hartford, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Hasychak v. Zoning Board of Appealsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rivera v. Commissioner of Correction
green
2 sentences2002"Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived." Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights Opportunities , 232 Conn. 91 , 115 , 653 A.2d 782 (1995). "[C]laims on appeal that are inadequately briefed are deemed abandoned." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Salvatore , 57 Conn. App. 396 , 401 , 749 A.2d 71 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 921 , 755 A.2d 216 (2000). 2002“Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived.” Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 232 Conn. 91, 115 , 653 A.2d 782 (1995). “[C]laims on appeal that are inadequately briefed are deemed abandoned.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Salvatore, 57 Conn. App. 396, 401 , 749 A.2d 71 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 921 , 755 A.2d 216 (2000). | 3 | 2001–2002 |
State v. Salvatore
green
2 sentences2002"Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived." Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights Opportunities , 232 Conn. 91 , 115 , 653 A.2d 782 (1995). "[C]laims on appeal that are inadequately briefed are deemed abandoned." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Salvatore , 57 Conn. App. 396 , 401 , 749 A.2d 71 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 921 , 755 A.2d 216 (2000). 2002“Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived.” Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 232 Conn. 91, 115 , 653 A.2d 782 (1995). “[C]laims on appeal that are inadequately briefed are deemed abandoned.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Salvatore, 57 Conn. App. 396, 401 , 749 A.2d 71 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 921 , 755 A.2d 216 (2000). | 3 | 2001–2002 |
State v. Salvatore
green
2 sentences2002“Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived.” Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 232 Conn. 91, 115 , 653 A.2d 782 (1995). “[C]laims on appeal that are inadequately briefed are deemed abandoned.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Salvatore, 57 Conn. App. 396, 401 , 749 A.2d 71 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 921 , 755 A.2d 216 (2000). 2002“Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived.” Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, 232 Conn. 91, 115 , 653 A.2d 782 (1995). “[C]laims on appeal that are inadequately briefed are deemed abandoned.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Salvatore, 57 Conn. App. 396, 401 , 749 A.2d 71 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 921 , 755 A.2d 216 (2000). | 3 | 2001–2002 |
State v. Jutras
green
2 sentences2020In addition, mere conclusory assertions regarding a claim, with no mention of relevant authority and minimal or no citations from the record, will not suffice.’’ (Internal quotation marks omit- ted.) State v. Wahab, 122 Conn. App. 537, 545 , 2 A.3d 7 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 918 , 4 A.3d 1230 (2010). 2016In addition, mere conclusory assertions regarding a claim, with no mention of relevant authority and minimal or no citations from the record, will not suffice." [Internal quotation marks omitted.] ), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 918 , 4 A.3d 1230 (2010). | 2 | 2016–2020 |
State v. Wahab
green
2 sentences2020In addition, mere conclusory assertions regarding a claim, with no mention of relevant authority and minimal or no citations from the record, will not suffice.’’ (Internal quotation marks omit- ted.) State v. Wahab, 122 Conn. App. 537, 545 , 2 A.3d 7 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 918 , 4 A.3d 1230 (2010). 2016In addition, mere conclusory assertions regarding a claim, with no mention of relevant authority and minimal or no citations from the record, will not suffice." [Internal quotation marks omitted.] ), cert. denied, 298 Conn. 918 , 4 A.3d 1230 (2010). | 2 | 2016–2020 |
Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Department of Education
green
2 sentences2015The plaintiffs, however, mentioned these claims in their briefs only in passing and failed to provide any substantive analysis of either claim. ‘‘Whe[n] an issue is merely men- tioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Electrical Con- tractors, Inc. v. Dept. of Education, 303 Conn. 402, 444 , 35 A.3d 188 (2012). 2015The plaintiffs, however, mentioned these claims in their briefs only in passing and failed to provide any substantive analysis of either claim. ‘‘Whe[n] an issue is merely men- tioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Electrical Con- tractors, Inc. v. Dept. of Education, 303 Conn. 402, 444 , 35 A.3d 188 (2012). | 2 | 2015–2016 |
Hayes v. Smith
green
2 sentences2000Bridgeport Hospital v. Comm. On Human Rights Opp. , 232 Conn. 91 , 115 (1995); Hayes v. Smith , 194 Conn. 52 , 66 n. 12 (1984). 1995Hayes v. Smith, 194 Conn. 52 , 66 n.12, 480 A.2d 425 (1984). | 2 | 1995–2000 |
Harris v. Commissioner of Correction
green
2 sentences1998Inc. , 238 Conn. 337 , 344 n. 11, 680 A.2d 1261 (1996) (stating that "[w]here an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived") (internal quotation marks omitted); Harris v. Commissioner of Correction , 40 Conn. App. 250 , 261 , 671 A.2d 359 (1996) (stating that "[t]he failure to brief an issue adequately constitutes abandonment of that issue"). 1998Inc. , 238 Conn. 337 , 344 n. 11, 680 A.2d 1261 (1996) (stating that "[w]here an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived") (internal quotation marks omitted); Harris v. Commissioner of Correction , 40 Conn. App. 250 , 261 , 671 A.2d 359 (1996) (stating that "[t]he failure to brief an issue adequately constitutes abandonment of that issue"). | 2 | 1997–1998 |
Worth v. Commissioner of Transportation
green
1 sentence2026Council v. Hein App. 506, 515 n.16, 43 A.3d 199 (“[A] motion to dismiss is not the appropriate procedural means to challenge an action commenced pursuant to the accidental failure of suit statute. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Cohn v. Johl
neutral
1 sentence2025Co., 57 Conn. App. 275, 282 , 748 A.2d 875 (2000), cert. granted, 253 Conn. 919 , 755 A.2d 213 (2000) (appeal withdrawn March 30, 2001). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Coville v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
green
1 sentence2025Co., 57 Conn. App. 275, 282 , 748 A.2d 875 (2000), cert. granted, 253 Conn. 919 , 755 A.2d 213 (2000) (appeal withdrawn March 30, 2001). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Coville v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
green
2 sentences2025Co., 57 Conn. App. 275, 282 , 748 A.2d 875 (2000), cert. granted, 253 Conn. 919 , 755 A.2d 213 (2000) (appeal withdrawn March 30, 2001). 2025Co., 57 Conn. App. 275, 282 , 748 A.2d 875 (2000), cert. granted, 253 Conn. 919 , 755 A.2d 213 (2000) (appeal withdrawn March 30, 2001). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Nathaniel T.
green
1 sentence2025See, e.g., Connecticut Coalition Against Millstone v. Connecticut Siting Council, 286 Conn. 57, 87 , 942 A.2d 345 (2008) (noting that when ‘‘an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)); State v. Nathaniel T., 230 Conn. App. 45 , 52–53, 329 A.3d 285 (2024) (declining to review claim as inadequately briefed when defendant did not provide any analysis or citation to authority in support of claim). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Nowacki v. Nowacki
green
2 sentences2024We do not reverse the judg- ment of a trial court on the basis of challenges to its rulings that have not been adequately briefed.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Nowacki v. Nowacki, 129 Conn. App. 157 , 163–64, 20 A.3d 702 (2011). ‘‘Whe[n] an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived. . . . 2024We do not reverse the judg- ment of a trial court on the basis of challenges to its rulings that have not been adequately briefed.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Nowacki v. Nowacki, 129 Conn. App. 157 , 163–64, 20 A.3d 702 (2011). ‘‘Whe[n] an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived. . . . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Manere v. Collins
green
1 sentence2022In addition, mere conclusory assertions regarding a claim, with no mention of relevant authority and minimal or no citations from the record, will not suffice.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Manere v. Collins, 200 Conn. App. 356 , 358 n.1, 241 A.3d 133 (2020); see also Barros v. Barros, 309 Conn. 499 , 503 n.4, 72 A.3d 367 (2013) (claim deemed abandoned when defen- dant merely referenced actions by trial court but failed to provide any legal analysis). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Traylor v. State
green
2 sentences2022Analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid aban- doning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Traylor v. State, 332 Conn. 789 , 804–805, 213 A.3d 467 (2019). ‘‘Whe[n] an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived. . . . 2022Analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid aban- doning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Traylor v. State, 332 Conn. 789 , 804–805, 213 A.3d 467 (2019). ‘‘Whe[n] an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived. . . . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Wilson v. Freedom of Information Commission
green
1 sentence2021Whe[n] an issue is merely men- tioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.)). 8 During the Senate proceedings discussing the bill, its proponent, Senator Wayne A. Baker made the following remarks: ‘‘[T]his bill originated in the Government Administration and Elections Committee and its purpose was to overturn the Supreme Court’s holding in a case of [Wilson v. Freedom of Information Commission, supra, 181 Conn. 324 ]. . . . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Wahab
green
2 sentences2020In addition, mere conclusory assertions regarding a claim, with no mention of relevant authority and minimal or no citations from the record, will not suffice.’’ (Internal quotation marks omit- ted.) State v. Wahab, 122 Conn. App. 537, 545 , 2 A.3d 7 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 918 , 4 A.3d 1230 (2010). 2020In addition, mere conclusory assertions regarding a claim, with no mention of relevant authority and minimal or no citations from the record, will not suffice.’’ (Internal quotation marks omit- ted.) State v. Wahab, 122 Conn. App. 537, 545 , 2 A.3d 7 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 918 , 4 A.3d 1230 (2010). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Estate of Rock v. University of Connecticut
green
2 sentences2020II The second claim that the plaintiff advances in this appeal is that he did not receive motion #156 by service of process.9 The plaintiff, however, devotes only one sentence, in his thirty page brief, to this claim. ‘‘Claims are . . . inadequately briefed when they . . . consist of conclusory assertions . . . with no mention of rele- vant authority and minimal or no citations from the record . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Estate of Rock v. University of Connecticut, 323 Conn. 26, 33 , 144 A.3d 420 (2016). ‘‘Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare asse 2020II The second claim that the plaintiff advances in this appeal is that he did not receive motion #156 by service of process.9 The plaintiff, however, devotes only one sentence, in his thirty page brief, to this claim. ‘‘Claims are . . . inadequately briefed when they . . . consist of conclusory assertions . . . with no mention of rele- vant authority and minimal or no citations from the record . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Estate of Rock v. University of Connecticut, 323 Conn. 26, 33 , 144 A.3d 420 (2016). ‘‘Where an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare asse | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| Kachalsky v. Cacace green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
In re Lee
green
1 sentence2019See Awdziewicz v. Meriden, 317 Conn. 122 , 125 n.3, 115 A.3d 1084 (2015) (‘‘[when] an issue is merely mentioned, but not briefed beyond a bare assertion of the claim, it is deemed to have been waived’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]); Harris v. Bradley Memorial Hospital & Health Center, Inc., 306 Conn. 304 , 319, 50 A.3d 841 (2012) (‘‘[a]n appellant who fails to brief a claim abandons it’’ [emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 569 U.S. 918 , 133 S. Ct. 1809 , 185 L. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| GlaxoSmithKline v. Human Med. Plans, Inc. green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| City of West Haven v. Norback green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Driska v. Pierce green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Treglia v. Santa Fuel, Inc. neutral | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| State v. Clark green | 1 | 2013–2013 |
| 418 Meadow Street Associates, LLC v. One Solution Services, LLC green | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| State v. MARQUETTE TOWNS green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| VIVO III v. Commissioner of Correction green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| Sturgeon v. Sturgeon neutral | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| State v. Torres green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| State v. Henao green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Reliance Insurance v. Reider green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| State v. Barnett green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Michigan v. Summers green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
| Savage v. Aronson green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Rodriguez v. Mallory Battery Co. green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.