Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 California opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Russian River Watershed Protection Committee Brenda Adelman v. City of Santa Rosagreen2 sentences2012In Russian River Watershed Protection Committee v. Santa Rosa (9th Cir. 1998) 142 F.3d 1136, 1138, 1141-1143 , the Ninth Circuit considered a challenge to a regional board’s executive officer’s selection of a method for measuring waterflow in order to determine compliance with NPDES permits. 2012The appellants apparently contended, as the Municipalities do here, that the executive officer’s authority violated section 13223, subdivision (a), which allows a regional board to delegate any of its powers to its executive director except, among other things, the issuance, modification, or revocation of a water quality control plan, water quality objectives, or waste discharge requirement. ( 142 F.3d at p. 1143 & fn. 2.) The Ninth Circuit rejected the challenge, noting that there were no cases interpreting that statutory provision, but that under federal law, “the establishment of a method o | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Swift Transportation Co.
green
2 sentences2013Federal Cases Holding That Motor Carriers May Lawfully Mark Up Chargebacks to Drivers In Swift, supra, 632 F.3d 1111 , the Ninth Circuit considered the claim of independent drivers that motor carriers violated federal law by marking up chargebacks. 2013Federal Cases Holding That Motor Carriers May Lawfully Mark Up Chargebacks to Drivers In Swift, supra, 632 F.3d 1111 , the Ninth Circuit considered the claim of independent drivers that motor carriers violated federal law by marking up chargebacks. | 2 | 2013–2013 |
cluster 783666
green
2 sentences2013In Environmental Defense Center, Inc. v. U.S.E.P.A. (9th Cir. 2003) 344 F.3d 832 (Environmental Defense Center), the Ninth Circuit considered a challenge to a ―Phase II‖ EPA rule for small municipal storm sewer systems. 2013In Environmental Defense Center, Inc. v. U.S.E.P.A. (9th Cir. 2003) 344 F.3d 832 (Environmental Defense Center), the Ninth Circuit considered a challenge to a ―Phase II‖ EPA rule for small municipal storm sewer systems. | 2 | 2013–2013 |
cluster 375613
green
1 sentence1995(Associated Gen., etc. v. San Francisco Unified Sch. (9th Cir. 1980) 616 F.2d 1381 , 1383.) The policy was struck down because it was inconsistent with the statutory requirement that a contract be let to the “lowest responsible bidder,” as defined by the California Supreme Court in City of Inglewood-L.A. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.
green
1 sentence1988The district court held the shareholders liable under the trust fund doctrine as enunciated in Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co., supra, 30 Cal.2d 335, 345 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.