Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 California opinions name it 2 courts 1942–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Marriage of Lucasgreen2 sentences2018(See, e.g., In re Marriage of Buol (1985) 39 Cal.3d 751 , 755, 218 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 705 P.2d 354 ["Under [former Civil Code section 4800.1 20 ] the only means of rebutting the presumption that property acquired during marriage in joint tenancy is community property is by providing evidence of a written agreement that the property is separate property"].) We are not persuaded by G.C.'s contention that "[u]nder Lucas , the joint title presumption of community property was rebutted." The Legislature adopted section 2581's predecessor statute (former Civil Code section 4800.1 ) "for the purpose of c 2018(See, e.g., In re Marriage of Buol (1985) 39 Cal.3d 751 , 755, 218 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 705 P.2d 354 ["Under [former Civil Code section 4800.1 20 ] the only means of rebutting the presumption that property acquired during marriage in joint tenancy is community property is by providing evidence of a written agreement that the property is separate property"].) We are not persuaded by G.C.'s contention that "[u]nder Lucas , the joint title presumption of community property was rebutted." The Legislature adopted section 2581's predecessor statute (former Civil Code section 4800.1 ) "for the purpose of c | 1 | 2 |
In Re Marriage of Kahangreen2 sentences2018(See, e.g., In re Marriage of Buol (1985) 39 Cal.3d 751 , 755, 218 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 705 P.2d 354 ["Under [former Civil Code section 4800.1 20 ] the only means of rebutting the presumption that property acquired during marriage in joint tenancy is community property is by providing evidence of a written agreement that the property is separate property"].) We are not persuaded by G.C.'s contention that "[u]nder Lucas , the joint title presumption of community property was rebutted." The Legislature adopted section 2581's predecessor statute (former Civil Code section 4800.1 ) "for the purpose of c 2018(See, e.g., In re Marriage of Buol (1985) 39 Cal.3d 751 , 755, 218 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 705 P.2d 354 ["Under [former Civil Code section 4800.1 20 ] the only means of rebutting the presumption that property acquired during marriage in joint tenancy is community property is by providing evidence of a written agreement that the property is separate property"].) We are not persuaded by G.C.'s contention that "[u]nder Lucas , the joint title presumption of community property was rebutted." The Legislature adopted section 2581's predecessor statute (former Civil Code section 4800.1 ) "for the purpose of c | 1 | 2 |
In Re Marriage of Buolgreen2 sentences2018(See, e.g., In re Marriage of Buol (1985) 39 Cal.3d 751 , 755, 218 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 705 P.2d 354 ["Under [former Civil Code section 4800.1 20 ] the only means of rebutting the presumption that property acquired during marriage in joint tenancy is community property is by providing evidence of a written agreement that the property is separate property"].) We are not persuaded by G.C.'s contention that "[u]nder Lucas , the joint title presumption of community property was rebutted." The Legislature adopted section 2581's predecessor statute (former Civil Code section 4800.1 ) "for the purpose of c 2018(See, e.g., In re Marriage of Buol (1985) 39 Cal.3d 751 , 755, 218 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 705 P.2d 354 ["Under [former Civil Code section 4800.1 20 ] the only means of rebutting the presumption that property acquired during marriage in joint tenancy is community property is by providing evidence of a written agreement that the property is separate property"].) We are not persuaded by G.C.'s contention that "[u]nder Lucas , the joint title presumption of community property was rebutted." The Legislature adopted section 2581's predecessor statute (former Civil Code section 4800.1 ) "for the purpose of c | 1 | 2 |
Aylmer v. Aylmergreen1 sentence2024As observed in Aylmer v. Aylmer (1956) 139 Cal.App.2d 696, 702 (Aylmer), section 953e was enacted “for the purpose of changing the rule announced in Diamond v. Superior Court [(1922)] 189 Cal. 732 , which had held that a new trial could not be granted on account of the death of a court reporter since this was not one of the statutory grounds for a new trial” under section 657. 4 Further unspecified references to rules are to the California Rules of Court. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Diamond v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences2024As observed in Aylmer v. Aylmer (1956) 139 Cal.App.2d 696, 702 (Aylmer), section 953e was enacted “for the purpose of changing the rule announced in Diamond v. Superior Court [(1922)] 189 Cal. 732 , which had held that a new trial could not be granted on account of the death of a court reporter since this was not one of the statutory grounds for a new trial” under section 657. 4 Further unspecified references to rules are to the California Rules of Court. 1956This section was added to the code in 1931 for the purpose of changing the rule announced in Diamond v. Superior Court, 189 Cal. 732 [ 210 P. 36 ], which had held that a new trial could not be granted on account of the death of a court reporter since this was not then one of the statutory grounds for new trial. . . . | 3 | 1945–2024 |
In Re Marriage of Neal
green
2 sentences2018(See, e.g., In re Marriage of Buol (1985) 39 Cal.3d 751 , 755, 218 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 705 P.2d 354 ["Under [former Civil Code section 4800.1 20 ] the only means of rebutting the presumption that property acquired during marriage in joint tenancy is community property is by providing evidence of a written agreement that the property is separate property"].) We are not persuaded by G.C.'s contention that "[u]nder Lucas , the joint title presumption of community property was rebutted." The Legislature adopted section 2581's predecessor statute (former Civil Code section 4800.1 ) "for the purpose of c 2018(See, e.g., In re Marriage of Buol (1985) 39 Cal.3d 751 , 755, 218 Cal.Rptr. 31 , 705 P.2d 354 ["Under [former Civil Code section 4800.1 20 ] the only means of rebutting the presumption that property acquired during marriage in joint tenancy is community property is by providing evidence of a written agreement that the property is separate property"].) We are not persuaded by G.C.'s contention that "[u]nder Lucas , the joint title presumption of community property was rebutted." The Legislature adopted section 2581's predecessor statute (former Civil Code section 4800.1 ) "for the purpose of c | 2 | 2018–2018 |
City of Merced v. County of Merced
green
2 sentences1968The respondent asserts that section 41803.5 was enacted only for the purpose of changing the rule and implications of City of Merced v. County of Merced, 240 Cal.App.2d 763 [ 50 Cal.Rptr. 287 ]. 1968The respondent asserts that section 41803.5 was enacted only for the purpose of changing the rule and implications of City of Merced v. County of Merced, 240 Cal.App.2d 763 [ 50 Cal.Rptr. 287 ]. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Brewer v. Feigenbaum
green
1 sentence1942In the case of Brewer v. Feigenbaum, 47 Cal. App. (2d) 171, 173 [ 117 P. (2d) 737 ], this is said with respect to these statutory changes: "It appears unnecessary to set forth in this opinion the lengthy provisions of said section 3897 of the Political Code as they existed on September 1, 1938. | 1 | 1942–1942 |