reviewing court to correct error (California) · Go Syfert
← California issues

reviewing court to correct error in California

7 California opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Leone v. Medical Bd. of Cal.green
cal · 2000 · cited in 3 California opinions naming this issue, 2011–2026
2 sentences

2026(See Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126 [appellate court must independently confirm jurisdiction over appeal].) “ ‘[A]ppellate jurisdiction’ is simply the power of a reviewing court to correct error in a trial court proceeding.” (Leone v. Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 666 .) “A reviewing court has jurisdiction over a direct appeal only when there is (1) an appealable order or (2) an appealable judgment.” (Griset v. Fair Political Practices Com. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 688, 696 ; accord, Efron v. Kalmanovitz (1960) 185 Cal.App.2d 149, 152 .) Statutes define which orders and judgmen

2019In a different context, our Supreme Court concluded that the term “appellate jurisdiction” refers to the power of “a reviewing court to correct error in a trial court proceeding . . . in the procedural context of a direct appeal or a writ petition.” (Leone v. Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 666 .) Moreover, a rule of court specific to writ proceedings before the court of appeal expressly assumes that parties in a juvenile dependency case are entitled to court-appointed counsel.

13
Powers v. City of Richmondgreen
cal · 1995 · cited in 2 California opinions naming this issue, 1998–2000
2 sentences

2000(See Powers, supra, 10 Cal.4th 85, 92-93 , 40 Cal.Rptr.2d 839 , 893 P.2d 1160 (plur. opn. of Kennard, J.), and cases cited therein.) Thus, the ordinary and widely accepted meaning of the term "appellate jurisdiction" is simply the power of a reviewing court to correct error in a trial court proceeding.

2000(See Powers, supra, 10 Cal.4th 85, 92-93 , 40 Cal.Rptr.2d 839 , 893 P.2d 1160 (plur. opn. of Kennard, J.), and cases cited therein.) Thus, the ordinary and widely accepted meaning of the term "appellate jurisdiction" is simply the power of a reviewing court to correct error in a trial court proceeding.

12
Garau v. Torrance Unified School Districtgreen
calctapp · 2006 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026(Kirk v. Ratner (2022) 74 Cal.App.5th 1052 , 1060; accord, Garau v. Torrance Unified School Dist. (2006) 137 Cal.App.4th 192, 198 ; see, e.g., § 904.1 [listing appealable orders and judgments in civil cases].) If a party appeals from a nonappealable order, the reviewing court has no jurisdiction and is required to dismiss the appeal.

11
Jennings v. Marrallegreen
cal · 1994 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026(See Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126 [appellate court must independently confirm jurisdiction over appeal].) “ ‘[A]ppellate jurisdiction’ is simply the power of a reviewing court to correct error in a trial court proceeding.” (Leone v. Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 666 .) “A reviewing court has jurisdiction over a direct appeal only when there is (1) an appealable order or (2) an appealable judgment.” (Griset v. Fair Political Practices Com. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 688, 696 ; accord, Efron v. Kalmanovitz (1960) 185 Cal.App.2d 149, 152 .) Statutes define which orders and judgmen

11
Efron v. Kalmanovitzgreen
calctapp · 1960 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026(See Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126 [appellate court must independently confirm jurisdiction over appeal].) “ ‘[A]ppellate jurisdiction’ is simply the power of a reviewing court to correct error in a trial court proceeding.” (Leone v. Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 666 .) “A reviewing court has jurisdiction over a direct appeal only when there is (1) an appealable order or (2) an appealable judgment.” (Griset v. Fair Political Practices Com. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 688, 696 ; accord, Efron v. Kalmanovitz (1960) 185 Cal.App.2d 149, 152 .) Statutes define which orders and judgmen

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Quantification Settlement Agreement Cases green
calctapp · 2011
2 sentences

2018As explained in Quantification Settlement Agreement Cases (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 758, 844 , “ ‘[T]he ordinary and widely accepted meaning of the term “appellate jurisdiction” is simply the power of a reviewing court to correct error in a trial court proceeding.’ [Citation.] ‘An appeal is not a trial but simply a method given litigants of rectifying errors, legal or factual, that may have occurred at a preceding hearing generally referred to as a trial.

2018As explained in Quantification Settlement Agreement Cases (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 758, 844 , “ ‘[T]he ordinary and widely accepted meaning of the term “appellate jurisdiction” is simply the power of a reviewing court to correct error in a trial court proceeding.’ [Citation.] ‘An appeal is not a trial but simply a method given litigants of rectifying errors, legal or factual, that may have occurred at a preceding hearing generally referred to as a trial.

22018–2018
Griset v. Fair Political Practices Commission green
cal · 2001
1 sentence

2026(See Jennings v. Marralle (1994) 8 Cal.4th 121, 126 [appellate court must independently confirm jurisdiction over appeal].) “ ‘[A]ppellate jurisdiction’ is simply the power of a reviewing court to correct error in a trial court proceeding.” (Leone v. Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 666 .) “A reviewing court has jurisdiction over a direct appeal only when there is (1) an appealable order or (2) an appealable judgment.” (Griset v. Fair Political Practices Com. (2001) 25 Cal.4th 688, 696 ; accord, Efron v. Kalmanovitz (1960) 185 Cal.App.2d 149, 152 .) Statutes define which orders and judgmen

12026–2026

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check