7 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1910–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
in Interest of C.W.B., Jrgreen2 sentences2025See C.W.B., Jr. v. A.S. , 2018 CO 8, ¶ 22 , 410 P.3d 438, 443 (explaining that article 3 of the Children's Code is designed to permit state intervention only "where necessary to protect the welfare of children"). 2025See C.W.B., Jr. v. A.S. , 2018 CO 8, ¶ 22 , 410 P.3d 438, 443 (explaining that article 3 of the Children's Code is designed to permit state intervention only "where necessary to protect the welfare of children"). | 1 | 1 |
People v. INTEREST OF TTgreen2 sentences2025See People in Int. of T.T. , 128 P.3d 328, 329-30 (Colo.App. 2005) (holding that evidence of a parent's prenatal substance abuse, including an infant's positive test for, among other substances, methamphetamines, "may . . . support the filing of a petition in dependency or neglect under § 19-3-102(1)(a)-(c)"). 2025See People in Int. of T.T. , 128 P.3d 328, 329-30 (Colo.App. 2005) (holding that evidence of a parent's prenatal substance abuse, including an infant's positive test for, among other substances, methamphetamines, "may . . . support the filing of a petition in dependency or neglect under § 19-3-102(1)(a)-(c)"). | 1 | 1 |
Olson v. Hillside Community Church, S.B.C.green1 sentence2002It accordingly reversed the trial court’s ruling on that issue, and remanded to the trial court to require Hillside to modify the church addition to comply with existing GMC ordinances. 3 In affirming the Respondents’ § 1983 claim, the court of appeals held that they had a “legitimate property interest arising from the GMC” and their “procedural due process rights were violated.” Olson v. Hillside Cmty. Church, 42 P.3d 52, 55 (Colo. *1025 App.2001). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Merchantgreen1 sentence2002See People v. Merchant, supra. The order is affirmed. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
v. Allen
green
1 sentence2020People v. Allen, 2019 CO 88, ¶ 13 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
green
2 sentences1993Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 23, the plaintiff class was certified as follows: Those present and prospective undergraduate student athletes who are or will be subject to the University of Colorado intercollegiate athletic department's drug education program as a condition of participation in the University of Colorado intercollegiate athletic program limited as follows: Those present undergraduate student athletes who have never tested positive or have been subject to discipline or sanction as a result of a positive test result; and those present student athletes, who, although having executed waivers 1993Pursuant to C.R.C.P. 23, the plaintiff class was certified as follows: Those present and prospective undergraduate student athletes who are or will be subject to the University of Colorado intercollegiate athletic department's drug education program as a condition of participation in the University of Colorado intercollegiate athletic program limited as follows: Those present undergraduate student athletes who have never tested positive or have been subject to discipline or sanction as a result of a positive test result; and those present student athletes, who, although having executed waivers | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Strauder v. West Virginia
red
2 sentences1962"The words of the amendment, it is true, are prohibitory, but they contain a necessary implication of a positive immunity, or right, most valuable to the colored race, the right to exemption from unfriendly legislation against them distinctively as colored, exemption from legal discriminations, implying inferiority in civil society, lessening the security of their enjoyment of the rights which others enjoy, and discriminations which are steps toward reducing them to the condition of a subject race." (Emphasis supplied.) Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 , 25 L.Ed. 664 . 1962"The words of the amendment, it is true, are prohibitory, but they contain a necessary implication of a positive immunity, or right, most valuable to the colored race, the right to exemption from unfriendly legislation against them distinctively as colored, exemption from legal discriminations, implying inferiority in civil society, lessening the security of their enjoyment of the rights which others enjoy, and discriminations which are steps toward reducing them to the condition of a subject race." (Emphasis supplied.) Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 , 25 L.Ed. 664 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Doe Ex Dem. Governeur's Heirs v. Robertson
green
1 sentence1910After reciting that, in Manuel v. Wulff, supra, the court had sustained the validity of a conveyance of a mining- location to an alien, reversing a decision of the Supreme Court of Montana to the contrary, states that the “decision was based upon the difference between a title by purchase and title by descent, and the doctrine expressed that an alien can take title by purchase and can only be divested of it by office found”; and then quotes from the case of Governeur v. Robertson, 11 Wheat. 332 , as follows: “That an alien can take by deed, and can hold until office found, must now be regarded | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Manuel v. Wulff
green
1 sentence1910After reciting that, in Manuel v. Wulff, supra, the court had sustained the validity of a conveyance of a mining- location to an alien, reversing a decision of the Supreme Court of Montana to the contrary, states that the “decision was based upon the difference between a title by purchase and title by descent, and the doctrine expressed that an alien can take title by purchase and can only be divested of it by office found”; and then quotes from the case of Governeur v. Robertson, 11 Wheat. 332 , as follows: “That an alien can take by deed, and can hold until office found, must now be regarded | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.