positive test in Kansas

2024Carrillo claims there was "no reasonable trial strategy to allow the introduction of these laboratory tests." Carrillo argues Podrebarac's failure to object to questionable hearsay shows a lack of advocacy on Carrillo's behalf. 13 In response, the State relies on Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685 , 122 S. Ct. 1843 , 152 L.

2024Carrillo claims there was "no reasonable trial strategy to allow the introduction of these laboratory tests." Carrillo argues Podrebarac's failure to object to questionable hearsay shows a lack of advocacy on Carrillo's behalf. 13 In response, the State relies on Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685 , 122 S. Ct. 1843 , 152 L.

2011The exact harm Berry claims to have experienced here was a foreseeable consequence of negligence in the testing and reporting of the test results to the Board." Berry, 41 Kan.App.2d at 618 , 205 P.3d 745 .

2011The exact harm Berry claims to have experienced here was a foreseeable consequence of negligence in the testing and reporting of the test results to the Board." Berry, 41 Kan.App.2d at 618 , 205 P.3d 745 .

2009The court in SmithKline Beecham was concerned that it was being asked to impose an unreasonable burden on testing entities by requiring them to inform each test subject of all possible sources and causes of positive test results. 903 S.W.2d at 353 .

2009The court in SmithKline Beecham was concerned that it was being asked to impose an unreasonable burden on testing entities by requiring them to inform each test subject of all possible sources and causes of positive test results. 903 S.W.2d at 353 .

1937The case of Brown v. International Indemnity Co., 121 Kan. 406 , 247 Pac. 432 , was where the insurance policy against theft of an automobile provided that the company would not be- liable for loss which might occur while the automobile was being rented, and it was held that no recovery could be had when the theft occurred while it was rented.

1937The case of Brown v. International Indemnity Co., 121 Kan. 406 , 247 Pac. 432 , was where the insurance policy against theft of an automobile provided that the company would not be- liable for loss which might occur while the automobile was being rented, and it was held that no recovery could be had when the theft occurred while it was rented.

1930Constructive as well as actual knowledge of the facts, and implied as well as express intent, satisfy the prime essential of a conclusive waiver.” (Pabst Brewing Co. v. Milwaukee, 126 Wis. 110, 117 .) A number of other authorities are cited as to the estoppel of one becoming a director of a corporation to later urge that it was never legally organized, but in this case the fraud alleged was committed by the organization committee in violating and disregarding a positive requirement for organization, which requirement was fully capable of being accurately determined just as well prior to the or

1929The very positive rule announced in the Black case is stated in connection with the following expression on page 703: “No concealment by the mother of the exact nature of the accounts rendered is shown or, from their very nature, can be shown.” In the case of Hinderliter v. Bell, 114 Kan. 857 , 221 Pac. 252 , cited by appellant, the following language is found in the syllabus: “And that there was no fraud or attempt tp prevent her from availing herself of the notice which the instruments and the record imparted.” Also, the following in the opinion: “Concealment of the transfer after it was mad

1929The very positive rule announced in the Black case is stated in connection with the following expression on page 703: “No concealment by the mother of the exact nature of the accounts rendered is shown or, from their very nature, can be shown.” In the case of Hinderliter v. Bell, 114 Kan. 857 , 221 Pac. 252 , cited by appellant, the following language is found in the syllabus: “And that there was no fraud or attempt tp prevent her from availing herself of the notice which the instruments and the record imparted.” Also, the following in the opinion: “Concealment of the transfer after it was mad

1923(Lasnier v. Martin, 102 Kan. 551 , 171 Pac. 645 ; Kirkpatrick v. Kirkpatrick, 112 Kan. 314 , 211 Pac. 146 .) So here, while it is clear enough that the testator did not intend that his daughter Georgia should have anything other than a life estate in this property, and that the remainder should devolve on her issue, with a limitation over upon the indefinite failure of issue, nevertheless the estate thus created constitutes an estate tail, which Georgia has the right to hold and continue in force (within the rule against perpetuities), or to terminate by conveyance at her discretion.

1923(Lasnier v. Martin, 102 Kan. 551 , 171 Pac. 645 ; Kirkpatrick v. Kirkpatrick, 112 Kan. 314 , 211 Pac. 146 .) So here, while it is clear enough that the testator did not intend that his daughter Georgia should have anything other than a life estate in this property, and that the remainder should devolve on her issue, with a limitation over upon the indefinite failure of issue, nevertheless the estate thus created constitutes an estate tail, which Georgia has the right to hold and continue in force (within the rule against perpetuities), or to terminate by conveyance at her discretion.

1923(Lasnier v. Martin, 102 Kan. 551 , 171 Pac. 645 ; Kirkpatrick v. Kirkpatrick, 112 Kan. 314 , 211 Pac. 146 .) So here, while it is clear enough that the testator did not intend that his daughter Georgia should have anything other than a life estate in this property, and that the remainder should devolve on her issue, with a limitation over upon the indefinite failure of issue, nevertheless the estate thus created constitutes an estate tail, which Georgia has the right to hold and continue in force (within the rule against perpetuities), or to terminate by conveyance at her discretion.

1923(Lasnier v. Martin, 102 Kan. 551 , 171 Pac. 645 ; Kirkpatrick v. Kirkpatrick, 112 Kan. 314 , 211 Pac. 146 .) So here, while it is clear enough that the testator did not intend that his daughter Georgia should have anything other than a life estate in this property, and that the remainder should devolve on her issue, with a limitation over upon the indefinite failure of issue, nevertheless the estate thus created constitutes an estate tail, which Georgia has the right to hold and continue in force (within the rule against perpetuities), or to terminate by conveyance at her discretion.