date of the dispositional hearing (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

date of the dispositional hearing in Connecticut

7 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2002 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
In re Kasheema L. green
connappct · 2000
2 sentences

2002"In making this determination, the trial court can consider all events occurring prior to the date of the dispositional hearing, including those occurring after the filing of the termination petition." (Citation omitted.) In re Kasheema L ., 56 Conn. App. 484 , 488 , 744 A.2d 441 (2000). 81 In deciding whether termination of the respondents' parental rights would be in the best interests of these children, the court has examined the multiple relevant factors, including the children's' interests in sustained growth, development, well-being, stability and continuity of their environment; their l

2001"In making this determination, the trial court can consider all events occurring prior to the date of the dispositional hearing, including those occurring after the filing of the termination petition." (Citation omitted.) In re Kasheema L ., 56 Conn. App. 484 , 488 , 744 A.2d 441 (2000).

72000–2002
In re Nelson T. green
connappct · 2000
2 sentences

2002"In making this determination, the trial court can consider all events occurring prior to the date of the dispositional hearing, including those occurring after the filing of the termination petition." (Citation omitted.) In re Kasheema L ., 56 Conn. App. 484 , 488 , 744 A.2d 441 (2000). 81 In deciding whether termination of the respondents' parental rights would be in the best interests of these children, the court has examined the multiple relevant factors, including the children's' interests in sustained growth, development, well-being, stability and continuity of their environment; their l

2001"In making this determination, the trial court can consider all events occurring prior to the date of the dispositional hearing, including those occurring after the filing of the termination petition." (Citation omitted.) In re Kasheema L ., 56 Conn. App. 484 , 488 , 744 A.2d 441 (2000).

62000–2002
In re Kasheema L. green
conn · 2000
2 sentences

2000This limitation is inapplicable in the dispositional phase, in which “the trial court can consider all events occurring prior to the date of the dispositional hearing, including those occurring after the filing of the termination petition.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Kasheema L., 56 Conn. App. 484, 488 , 744 A.2d 441 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 945 , 747 A.2d 522 (2000).

2000This limitation is inapplicable in the dispositional phase, in which “the trial court can consider all events occurring prior to the date of the dispositional hearing, including those occurring after the filing of the termination petition.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Kasheema L., 56 Conn. App. 484, 488 , 744 A.2d 441 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 945 , 747 A.2d 522 (2000).

22000–2000
In re Tabitha green
connappct · 1995
2 sentences

2000In re Tabitha P., 39 Conn. App. 353, 367 , 664 A.2d 1168 (1995); see also Practice Book § 33-3 (a). 4 This limitation is inapplicable in the dispositional phase, in which the trial court can consider all events occurring prior to the date of the dispositional hearing, including those occurring after the filing of the termination petition. ...

2000In re Tabitha P., 39 Conn. App. 353, 367 , 664 A.2d 1168 (1995); see also Practice Book § 33-3 (a). 4 This limitation is inapplicable in the dispositional phase, in which the trial court can consider all events occurring prior to the date of the dispositional hearing, including those occurring after the filing of the termination petition. ...

22000–2000
In re Shyina B. green
connappct · 2000
1 sentence

2002In re Alexander C ., 60 Conn. App. 555 , 559 , ___ A.2d ___ (2000); In re Shyina B ., 58 Conn. App. 159 , 167 , ___ A.2d ___ (2000); In re Savanna M, supra, 55 Conn. App. 816 .

12002–2002
In re Alexander C. green
connappct · 2000
1 sentence

2002In re Alexander C ., 60 Conn. App. 555 , 559 , ___ A.2d ___ (2000); In re Shyina B ., 58 Conn. App. 159 , 167 , ___ A.2d ___ (2000); In re Savanna M, supra, 55 Conn. App. 816 .

12002–2002
Schult v. Schult green
conn · 1997
2 sentences

2001As noted, CT Page 4884 "[t]he best interests of the child include the child's interests in sustained growth, development, well-being, and continuity and stability of its environment." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Shyina B ., supra, 58 Conn. App. 167 , quoting Schult v. Schult , 241 Conn. 767 , 777 , 699 A.2d 134 (1997).

2001As noted, CT Page 4884 "[t]he best interests of the child include the child's interests in sustained growth, development, well-being, and continuity and stability of its environment." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Shyina B ., supra, 58 Conn. App. 167 , quoting Schult v. Schult , 241 Conn. 767 , 777 , 699 A.2d 134 (1997).

12001–2001
In re Savanna M. green
connappct · 1999
2 sentences

2001In determining whether termination of the parental rights of Daniel S. and Cheryl A. would be in the best interests of Rebecca, Katelyn, Trevor and Tasha, the court has examined multiple relevant factors including, among other things, the length of the children's stay with their foster parents; the nature of their relationship with their foster parents; the nature of their relationship with their biological parents; the degree of contact maintained with them; and their genetic bond. 65 In re Savanna M ., 55 Conn. App. 807 , 816 , 740 A.2d 484 (1999).

2001In determining whether termination of the parental rights of Daniel S. and Cheryl A. would be in the best interests of Rebecca, Katelyn, Trevor and Tasha, the court has examined multiple relevant factors including, among other things, the length of the children's stay with their foster parents; the nature of their relationship with their foster parents; the nature of their relationship with their biological parents; the degree of contact maintained with them; and their genetic bond. 65 In re Savanna M ., 55 Conn. App. 807 , 816 , 740 A.2d 484 (1999).

12001–2001
In re Shane P. green
connappct · 2000
2 sentences

2000In re Kasheema L., 56 Conn. App. 484, 488 , 744 A.2d 441 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 945 , 747 A.2d 522 (2000).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Shane P., 58 Conn. App. 234, 239-40 , 753 A.2d 409 (2000).

2000In re Kasheema L., 56 Conn. App. 484, 488 , 744 A.2d 441 , cert. denied, 252 Conn. 945 , 747 A.2d 522 (2000).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) In re Shane P., 58 Conn. App. 234, 239-40 , 753 A.2d 409 (2000).

12000–2000

Where else courts name it

CT 7 (2000–2002) NY 5 (1974–2026) IL 5 (1989–2003) CA 4 (2014–2021) OH 3 (2003–2015) WV 2 (2017–2017) NC 2 (2007–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check