deficiency judgment hearing in Connecticut

1994Associated East Mortgage and Maresca , supra. In Eichman v. J J Building Co. , supra, the phrase is used to distinguish the mandatory duty of a referee to assign a value to land in a condemnation proceeding from the authority of the court in a deficiency judgment hearing, as in other civil actions, to find that the plaintiff had not carried the burden of proving adequately the value of the real property so that any value could be assigned to it.

1991However, ". . . the deficiency judgment procedure, although procedurally a part of the foreclosure action, serves the separate function of providing for recovery on the balance of the note which was not satisfied by the strict foreclosure." Maresca v. DeMatteo, 6 Conn. App. 691 , 696 (1986).

2016The intent of the deficiency proceeding ‘‘is to determine through a hearing the value of the property that has been foreclosed as of the date title vests in the mortgagee and to award the difference between that value and the amount of the debt as established by the foreclosure judgment.’’ Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. D’Avanzo, 31 Conn. App. 621, 626 , 626 A.2d 800 , cert. denied, 227 Conn. 909 , 632 A.2d 688 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S. Ct. 1303 , 127 L.

2016The intent of the deficiency proceeding ‘‘is to determine through a hearing the value of the property that has been foreclosed as of the date title vests in the mortgagee and to award the difference between that value and the amount of the debt as established by the foreclosure judgment.’’ Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. D’Avanzo, 31 Conn. App. 621, 626 , 626 A.2d 800 , cert. denied, 227 Conn. 909 , 632 A.2d 688 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S. Ct. 1303 , 127 L.

2016The purpose of a strict foreclosure hearing is distinct from that of a deficiency judgment hearing. ‘‘[I]n a strict foreclosure, the vesting of title operates to reduce the debt by the value of the property.’’ National City Mort- gage Co. v. Stoecker, 92 Conn. App. 787, 794 , 888 A.2d 95 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 925 , 895 A.2d 799 (2006).

2016The purpose of a strict foreclosure hearing is distinct from that of a deficiency judgment hearing. ‘‘[I]n a strict foreclosure, the vesting of title operates to reduce the debt by the value of the property.’’ National City Mort- gage Co. v. Stoecker, 92 Conn. App. 787, 794 , 888 A.2d 95 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 925 , 895 A.2d 799 (2006).

2016The intent of the deficiency proceeding ‘‘is to determine through a hearing the value of the property that has been foreclosed as of the date title vests in the mortgagee and to award the difference between that value and the amount of the debt as established by the foreclosure judgment.’’ Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. D’Avanzo, 31 Conn. App. 621, 626 , 626 A.2d 800 , cert. denied, 227 Conn. 909 , 632 A.2d 688 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S. Ct. 1303 , 127 L.

2016The intent of the deficiency proceeding ‘‘is to determine through a hearing the value of the property that has been foreclosed as of the date title vests in the mortgagee and to award the difference between that value and the amount of the debt as established by the foreclosure judgment.’’ Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. D’Avanzo, 31 Conn. App. 621, 626 , 626 A.2d 800 , cert. denied, 227 Conn. 909 , 632 A.2d 688 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S. Ct. 1303 , 127 L.

2016The intent of the deficiency proceeding ‘‘is to determine through a hearing the value of the property that has been foreclosed as of the date title vests in the mortgagee and to award the difference between that value and the amount of the debt as established by the foreclosure judgment.’’ Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. D’Avanzo, 31 Conn. App. 621, 626 , 626 A.2d 800 , cert. denied, 227 Conn. 909 , 632 A.2d 688 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S. Ct. 1303 , 127 L.

2016The intent of the deficiency proceeding ‘‘is to determine through a hearing the value of the property that has been foreclosed as of the date title vests in the mortgagee and to award the difference between that value and the amount of the debt as established by the foreclosure judgment.’’ Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. D’Avanzo, 31 Conn. App. 621, 626 , 626 A.2d 800 , cert. denied, 227 Conn. 909 , 632 A.2d 688 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S. Ct. 1303 , 127 L.

2016The intent of the deficiency proceeding ‘‘is to determine through a hearing the value of the property that has been foreclosed as of the date title vests in the mortgagee and to award the difference between that value and the amount of the debt as established by the foreclosure judgment.’’ Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. D’Avanzo, 31 Conn. App. 621, 626 , 626 A.2d 800 , cert. denied, 227 Conn. 909 , 632 A.2d 688 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1195 , 114 S. Ct. 1303 , 127 L.

2016The purpose of a strict foreclosure hearing is distinct from that of a deficiency judgment hearing. ‘‘[I]n a strict foreclosure, the vesting of title operates to reduce the debt by the value of the property.’’ National City Mort- gage Co. v. Stoecker, 92 Conn. App. 787, 794 , 888 A.2d 95 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 925 , 895 A.2d 799 (2006).

2016The purpose of a strict foreclosure hearing is distinct from that of a deficiency judgment hearing. ‘‘[I]n a strict foreclosure, the vesting of title operates to reduce the debt by the value of the property.’’ National City Mort- gage Co. v. Stoecker, 92 Conn. App. 787, 794 , 888 A.2d 95 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 925 , 895 A.2d 799 (2006).

2000A deficiency judgment hearing "presupposes that all questions of liability shall have been theretofore determined." Bank of Stamford v. Alaimo , 31 Conn. App. 1 , 6 , 622 A.2d 1057 (1993).

2000A deficiency judgment hearing "presupposes that all questions of liability shall have been theretofore determined." Bank of Stamford v. Alaimo , 31 Conn. App. 1 , 6 , 622 A.2d 1057 (1993).

1999Mitsubishi makes no claim that such a representation was made at the deficiency judgment hearing and the record discloses none. 5 In addition, “the value placed on the property by the court for the purposes of rendering judgment of strict foreclosure and setting law days was irrelevant to a subsequent deficiency judgment proceeding.” Eichman v. J & J Building Co., 216 Conn. 443, 457 , 582 A.2d 182 (1990).

1999Mitsubishi makes no claim that such a representation was made at the deficiency judgment hearing and the record discloses none. 5 In addition, “the value placed on the property by the court for the purposes of rendering judgment of strict foreclosure and setting law days was irrelevant to a subsequent deficiency judgment proceeding.” Eichman v. J & J Building Co., 216 Conn. 443, 457 , 582 A.2d 182 (1990).

1992New Haven Savings Bank v. West Haven Sound Development, 190 Conn. 60 , 459 A.2d 999 (1983); Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Slade, 122 Conn. 451, 459 , 190 A. 616 (1932).

1992New Haven Savings Bank v. West Haven Sound Development, 190 Conn. 60 , 459 A.2d 999 (1983); Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Slade, 122 Conn. 451, 459 , 190 A. 616 (1932).

1992New Haven Savings Bank v. West Haven Sound Development, 190 Conn. 60 , 459 A.2d 999 (1983); Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Slade, 122 Conn. 451, 459 , 190 A. 616 (1932).

1992New Haven Savings Bank v. West Haven Sound Development, 190 Conn. 60 , 459 A.2d 999 (1983); Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Slade, 122 Conn. 451, 459 , 190 A. 616 (1932).

1992In addition, the plaintiff, citing Breen v. Phelps, 186 Conn. 86 , argues that a deficiency judgment claim is a contingent claim, and contingent claims are exempted from the statute.