Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Connecticut opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Laurel Beach Ass'n v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Milford
green
2 sentences2002Once merged, the lots form one lot that meets or more closely approximates the zoning requirements and the separate lots lose their exception for nonconformance." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Laurel Beach Assn. v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 66 Conn. App. 640 , 653 , 785 A.2d 1169 (2001). 2002Once merged, the lots form one lot that meets or more closely approximates the zoning requirements and the separate lots lose their exception for nonconformance." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Laurel Beach Assn. v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 66 Conn. App. 640 , 653 , 785 A.2d 1169 (2001). | 4 | 2002–2002 |
Johnson v. Board of Zoning Appeals
green
2 sentences2002Two years later, the Appellate Court cited Neumann for the proposition that: "Merger can occur CT Page 16156 by operation of law; that is, a town's zoning regulations may mandate merger of adjacent lots that are commonly owned." Marino v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 22 Conn. App. 606 , 607 , n. 1, 578 A.2d 165 (1990). 3 "Once merged, the lots form one lot that meets or more closely approximates the zoning requirements and the separate lots lose their exception for nonconformance." Johnson v. Board of Zoning Appeals , 35 Conn. App. 820 , 826 , 646 A.2d 953 (1994). 2002Two years later, the Appellate Court cited Neumann for the proposition that: "Merger can occur CT Page 16156 by operation of law; that is, a town's zoning regulations may mandate merger of adjacent lots that are commonly owned." Marino v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 22 Conn. App. 606 , 607 , n. 1, 578 A.2d 165 (1990). 3 "Once merged, the lots form one lot that meets or more closely approximates the zoning requirements and the separate lots lose their exception for nonconformance." Johnson v. Board of Zoning Appeals , 35 Conn. App. 820 , 826 , 646 A.2d 953 (1994). | 3 | 1995–2002 |
Marino v. Zoning Board of Appeals
green
2 sentences2002Two years later, the Appellate Court cited Neumann for the proposition that: "Merger can occur CT Page 16156 by operation of law; that is, a town's zoning regulations may mandate merger of adjacent lots that are commonly owned." Marino v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 22 Conn. App. 606 , 607 , n. 1, 578 A.2d 165 (1990). 3 "Once merged, the lots form one lot that meets or more closely approximates the zoning requirements and the separate lots lose their exception for nonconformance." Johnson v. Board of Zoning Appeals , 35 Conn. App. 820 , 826 , 646 A.2d 953 (1994). 2002Two years later, the Appellate Court cited Neumann for the proposition that: "Merger can occur CT Page 16156 by operation of law; that is, a town's zoning regulations may mandate merger of adjacent lots that are commonly owned." Marino v. Zoning Board of Appeals , 22 Conn. App. 606 , 607 , n. 1, 578 A.2d 165 (1990). 3 "Once merged, the lots form one lot that meets or more closely approximates the zoning requirements and the separate lots lose their exception for nonconformance." Johnson v. Board of Zoning Appeals , 35 Conn. App. 820 , 826 , 646 A.2d 953 (1994). | 2 | 1996–2002 |