7 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Canty v. Ottogreen2 sentences2018Because of the different effect of the rulings in these categories, drawing a distinction between them for purposes of the final judgment rule advances the policies underlying that rule, "namely, the prevention of piecemeal appeals and the conservation of judicial resources." Niro v. Niro , 314 Conn. 62 , 78, 100 A.3d 801 (2014) ; see also Canty v. Otto , 304 Conn. 546 , 554, 41 A.3d 280 (2012) (citing policy " 'to facilitate *1172 the speedy and orderly disposition of cases at the trial court level' "). 2018Because of the different effect of the rulings in these categories, drawing a distinction between them for purposes of the final judgment rule advances the policies underlying that rule, "namely, the prevention of piecemeal appeals and the conservation of judicial resources." Niro v. Niro , 314 Conn. 62 , 78, 100 A.3d 801 (2014) ; see also Canty v. Otto , 304 Conn. 546 , 554, 41 A.3d 280 (2012) (citing policy " 'to facilitate *1172 the speedy and orderly disposition of cases at the trial court level' "). | 2 | 2 |
Nobles v. Memorial Hospital of Laramie Countygreen1 sentence2016See Nobles v. Memorial Hospital of Laramie County, 301 P.3d 517 , 527–29 (Wyo. 2013) (rejecting single act exception to continuing course of treatment doctrine because exception is ‘‘at odds with the basic policies at the heart of the continuous treatment rule’’).11 The defendants also contend that, even if evidence of continuing negligence is not required, the continuing course of treatment doctrine does not apply here because ‘‘the plaintiff certainly could not have antici- pated [that] the defendant would have treated her for a retained foreign object of which no one was aware.’’ See Grey v | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shay v. Rossi
green
2 sentences2008Moreover, the Miller court rejected the adoption of the case-by-case standard previously articulated in Shay v. Rossi, 253 Conn. 134, 172 , 749 A.2d 1147 (2000), overruled in part by Miller v. Egan, 265 Conn. 301, 325 , 828 A.2d 549 (2003). 2008Moreover, the Miller court rejected the adoption of the case-by-case standard previously articulated in Shay v. Rossi, 253 Conn. 134, 172 , 749 A.2d 1147 (2000), overruled in part by Miller v. Egan, 265 Conn. 301, 325 , 828 A.2d 549 (2003). | 2 | 2006–2008 |
Ash v. Town of New Milford
green
2 sentences2018This is further supported by "the principles underlying Connecticut practice in **251 [workers'] compensation cases: that the legislation is remedial in nature ... and that it should be broadly construed to accomplish its humanitarian purpose." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Ash v. New Milford , 207 Conn. 665 , 672, 541 A.2d 1233 (1988). 2018This is further supported by "the principles underlying Connecticut practice in **251 [workers'] compensation cases: that the legislation is remedial in nature ... and that it should be broadly construed to accomplish its humanitarian purpose." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Ash v. New Milford , 207 Conn. 665 , 672, 541 A.2d 1233 (1988). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Lafayette v. General Dynamics Corp.
green
2 sentences2018The defendant cites no authority for the proposition that the policies underlying the doctrine of collateral estoppel, namely, the " 'stability of former judgments and finality' "; Lafayette v. General Dynamics Corp. , supra, 255 Conn. at 772 , 770 A.2d 1 ; would have no application in the present case, insofar as the issue of causation has been actually litigated and necessarily determined. 2018The defendant cites no authority for the proposition that the policies underlying the doctrine of collateral estoppel, namely, the " 'stability of former judgments and finality' "; Lafayette v. General Dynamics Corp. , supra, 255 Conn. at 772 , 770 A.2d 1 ; would have no application in the present case, insofar as the issue of causation has been actually litigated and necessarily determined. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Miller v. Egan
green
2 sentences2008Because a court may tailor declaratory and ipjunctive relief so as to minimize any such interference, and in order to afford an opportunity for voluntary compliance with the judgment, actions that seek injunctive or declaratory relief against a state officer acting in excess of statutory authority or pursuant to an unconstitutional statute do not conflict with the policies underlying the doctrine of sovereign immunity.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Miller v. Egan, 265 Conn. 301, 314 , 828 A.2d 549 (2003). 2008Because a court may tailor declaratory and ipjunctive relief so as to minimize any such interference, and in order to afford an opportunity for voluntary compliance with the judgment, actions that seek injunctive or declaratory relief against a state officer acting in excess of statutory authority or pursuant to an unconstitutional statute do not conflict with the policies underlying the doctrine of sovereign immunity.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Miller v. Egan, 265 Conn. 301, 314 , 828 A.2d 549 (2003). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Doe v. Heintz
green
2 sentences2003Doe v. Heintz, 204 Conn. 17, 32 , 526 A.2d 1318 (1987). 2003Doe v. Heintz, 204 Conn. 17, 32 , 526 A.2d 1318 (1987). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.