Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Whitfield v. Department of Correctionsgreen1 sentence2014See, e.g., Whitfield v. Dep’t of Corrections, 107 So.3d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Gonzalez v. State, 604 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). 4 . | 1 | 1 |
Stovall v. Coopergreen1 sentence2012See Stovall v. Cooper, 860 So.2d 5, 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (distinguishing a petition for writ of mandamus from a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the context of an action that sought review of a gain-time decision after the exhaustion of all administrative remedies). | 1 | 1 |
Bass v. Department of Correctionsgreen1 sentence2001See Bass v. Department of Corrections, 684 So.2d 834 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Endress v. Department of Corrections, 612 So.2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Donald Waters v. Department of Corrections
green
1 sentence2015“A petition for writ of mandamus filed in the circuit court is the correct manner for an inmate to challenge a determination that a grievance appeal is untimely.” Id. at 615 n. 3. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Gonzalez v. State
green
1 sentence2014See, e.g., Whitfield v. Dep’t of Corrections, 107 So.3d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Gonzalez v. State, 604 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). 4 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Johnson v. Nelson
green
1 sentence2002Id. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Endress v. FLA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
green
1 sentence2001See Bass v. Department of Corrections, 684 So.2d 834 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Endress v. Department of Corrections, 612 So.2d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Wolff v. McDonnell
green
2 sentences1985This Court has repeatedly recognized that while lawful incarceration carries with it the circumspection or loss of many significant rights, an inmate may challenge the Department of Corrections’ compliance with its own rules and with the procedural requirements of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). 1985This Court has repeatedly recognized that while lawful incarceration carries with it the circumspection or loss of many significant rights, an inmate may challenge the Department of Corrections’ compliance with its own rules and with the procedural requirements of Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Bagley v. Brierton
green
1 sentence1985Bagley v. Brierton, 362 So.2d 1048 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Gobie v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COM'N
green
1 sentence1983The rationale behind Gobie, supra, is that the inmate may challenge the factual basis for the Commission action, which Jackson has done. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.