Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brinson v. Stategreen2 sentences2010However, he again fails to cite any legal authority in support of this contention, and we have found none. “[W]ith regard to asserted errors by the trial court, a cumulative error rule is not applied. [Cit.]” Brown v. State, 285 Ga. 772, 774 (3) ( 683 SE2d 581 ) (2009). “ ‘Because this state does not recognize the concept of cumulative error, it is incumbent upon the defendant to show error with regard to each point he raises.’ ” Brinson v. State, 243 Ga. App. 50, 52 (3) ( 530 SE2d 798 ) (2000). 2010However, he again fails to cite any legal authority in support of this contention, and we have found none. “[W]ith regard to asserted errors by the trial court, a cumulative error rule is not applied. [Cit.]” Brown v. State, 285 Ga. 772, 774 (3) ( 683 SE2d 581 ) (2009). “ ‘Because this state does not recognize the concept of cumulative error, it is incumbent upon the defendant to show error with regard to each point he raises.’ ” Brinson v. State, 243 Ga. App. 50, 52 (3) ( 530 SE2d 798 ) (2000). | 3 | 3 |
Campbell v. Stategreen2 sentences1987“Because this state does not recognize the concept of ‘cumulative error,’ it is incumbent upon the defendant to show error with regard to each point he raises. [Cits.]” Campbell v. State, 181 Ga. App. 1, 3 (2) ( 351 SE2d 209 ) (1986). 1987“Because this state does not recognize the concept of ‘cumulative error,’ it is incumbent upon the defendant to show error with regard to each point he raises. [Cits.]” Campbell v. State, 181 Ga. App. 1, 3 (2) ( 351 SE2d 209 ) (1986). | 2 | 2 |
Curtis v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Thus, this enumeration “raises nothing for appellate review.” Curtis v. State, 182 Ga. App. 899, 901 (3) ( 357 SE2d 602 ) (1987). 2010Thus, this enumeration “raises nothing for appellate review.” Curtis v. State, 182 Ga. App. 899, 901 (3) ( 357 SE2d 602 ) (1987). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2010However, he again fails to cite any legal authority in support of this contention, and we have found none. “[W]ith regard to asserted errors by the trial court, a cumulative error rule is not applied. [Cit.]” Brown v. State, 285 Ga. 772, 774 (3) ( 683 SE2d 581 ) (2009). “ ‘Because this state does not recognize the concept of cumulative error, it is incumbent upon the defendant to show error with regard to each point he raises.’ ” Brinson v. State, 243 Ga. App. 50, 52 (3) ( 530 SE2d 798 ) (2000). 2010However, he again fails to cite any legal authority in support of this contention, and we have found none. “[W]ith regard to asserted errors by the trial court, a cumulative error rule is not applied. [Cit.]” Brown v. State, 285 Ga. 772, 774 (3) ( 683 SE2d 581 ) (2009). “ ‘Because this state does not recognize the concept of cumulative error, it is incumbent upon the defendant to show error with regard to each point he raises.’ ” Brinson v. State, 243 Ga. App. 50, 52 (3) ( 530 SE2d 798 ) (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Quakenbush v. Quakenbushgreen2 sentences1975Quakenbush v. Quakenbush, 230 Ga. 649, 650 (a) ( 198 SE2d 851 ); Greene v. McIntyre, 119 Ga. App. 296, 297 (3) ( 167 SE2d 203 ). 4. 1975Quakenbush v. Quakenbush, 230 Ga. 649, 650 (a) ( 198 SE2d 851 ); Greene v. McIntyre, 119 Ga. App. 296, 297 (3) ( 167 SE2d 203 ). 4. | 1 | 1 |
Greene v. McIntyregreen2 sentences1975Quakenbush v. Quakenbush, 230 Ga. 649, 650 (a) ( 198 SE2d 851 ); Greene v. McIntyre, 119 Ga. App. 296, 297 (3) ( 167 SE2d 203 ). 4. 1975Quakenbush v. Quakenbush, 230 Ga. 649, 650 (a) ( 198 SE2d 851 ); Greene v. McIntyre, 119 Ga. App. 296, 297 (3) ( 167 SE2d 203 ). 4. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sierra v. State
green
2 sentences1986Veal v. State, 167 Ga. App. 175 (3d) ( 306 SE2d 667 ) (1983); Sierra v. State, 155 Ga. App. 198 ( 270 SE2d 368 ) (1980). 1986Veal v. State, 167 Ga. App. 175 (3d) ( 306 SE2d 667 ) (1983); Sierra v. State, 155 Ga. App. 198 ( 270 SE2d 368 ) (1980). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Veal v. State
green
2 sentences1986Veal v. State, 167 Ga. App. 175 (3d) ( 306 SE2d 667 ) (1983); Sierra v. State, 155 Ga. App. 198 ( 270 SE2d 368 ) (1980). 1986Veal v. State, 167 Ga. App. 175 (3d) ( 306 SE2d 667 ) (1983); Sierra v. State, 155 Ga. App. 198 ( 270 SE2d 368 ) (1980). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.