doubtful or disputed claim (Georgia) · Go Syfert
← Georgia issues

doubtful or disputed claim in Georgia

7 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1909–1983 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Teasley v. Bradleygreen
ga · 1900 · cited in 6 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1918–1983
2 sentences

1952Its meaning is amplified in Teasley v. Bradley, 110 Ga. 497, 507 ( 35 S. E. 782 ), as follows: “There is a distinction between an offer or proposition to compromise a doubtful or disputed claim, *297 and an offer to settle upon certain terms a claim that is unquestioned.

1952Its meaning is amplified in Teasley v. Bradley, 110 Ga. 497, 507 ( 35 S. E. 782 ), as follows: “There is a distinction between an offer or proposition to compromise a doubtful or disputed claim, *297 and an offer to settle upon certain terms a claim that is unquestioned.

56

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Cooper v. Jones green
ga · 1888
2 sentences

1909As bearing upon the. point in question and showing that unless negotiations for a compromise, participated in by both parties, were pending, admissions of indebtedness, resultant from offers to pay the demand (though proposing to pay in a different way from that claimed by the creditor), are not inadmissible, see Hatcher v. Bowen, 74 Ga. 841 (c); Cooper v. Jones, 79 Ga. 379 ( 4 S. E. 916 ); Akers v. Kirk, supra. In the Hatcher case, supra, it was held that “an offer to pay a debt with a mule, not made pending any negotiations to compromise, was admissible as a direct acknowledgment of the clai

1909As bearing upon the. point in question and showing that unless negotiations for a compromise, participated in by both parties, were pending, admissions of indebtedness, resultant from offers to pay the demand (though proposing to pay in a different way from that claimed by the creditor), are not inadmissible, see Hatcher v. Bowen, 74 Ga. 841 (c); Cooper v. Jones, 79 Ga. 379 ( 4 S. E. 916 ); Akers v. Kirk, supra. In the Hatcher case, supra, it was held that “an offer to pay a debt with a mule, not made pending any negotiations to compromise, was admissible as a direct acknowledgment of the clai

11909–1909

Where else courts name it

GA 7 (1909–1983) NY 6 (1875–1898) OK 6 (1937–1970) PA 3 (1973–1998) IL 2 (1887–1909) OR 2 (1912–1927) AL 2 (1890–1912) CA 2 (1916–1929)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check