exhibit hearing in Georgia

2022See State v. Lane, 308 Ga. 10, 18 (1) ( 838 SE2d 808 ) (2020) (“[E]ven in the evidentiary context, a defendant who wishes to take advantage of the [cumulative-error] rule that we adopt today should explain to the reviewing court just how he was prejudiced by the cumulative effect of multiple errors.”).

2022See State v. Lane, 308 Ga. 10, 18 (1) ( 838 SE2d 808 ) (2020) (“[E]ven in the evidentiary context, a defendant who wishes to take advantage of the [cumulative-error] rule that we adopt today should explain to the reviewing court just how he was prejudiced by the cumulative effect of multiple errors.”).

2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e

2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).

2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993).