Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1975–1988 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Baxter v. Stategreen2 sentences1986As argued by appellant, we have held in Baxter v. State, 254 Ga. 538, 548 (18) ( 331 SE2d 561 ) (1985), that “a defendant in a criminal case has the right, upon request, to examine a document used by a witness to refresh his recollection. 1986As argued by appellant, we have held in Baxter v. State, 254 Ga. 538, 548 (18) ( 331 SE2d 561 ) (1985), that “a defendant in a criminal case has the right, upon request, to examine a document used by a witness to refresh his recollection. | 1 | 1 |
Kates v. Stategreen2 sentences1985That evidence brings this case within the rule stated in Kates v. State, 152 Ga. App. 29, 30 ( 262 SE2d 221 ) (1979): “It is not necessary that the authenticity of an exhibit be proved to an absolute certainty. [Cits.] Unlike fungible items, distinct physical objects which can be identified upon mere observation require no custodial proof for their admission. [Cits.]” The ninth enumeration of error is without merit. 9. 1985That evidence brings this case within the rule stated in Kates v. State, 152 Ga. App. 29, 30 ( 262 SE2d 221 ) (1979): “It is not necessary that the authenticity of an exhibit be proved to an absolute certainty. [Cits.] Unlike fungible items, distinct physical objects which can be identified upon mere observation require no custodial proof for their admission. [Cits.]” The ninth enumeration of error is without merit. 9. | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences1979In Thomas v. State, 240 Ga. 393, 401 ( 242 SE2d 1 ) (1977), this court held that mitigating circumstances "are not required to be singled out under Georgia law.” The ninth enumeration of error is . without merit. 10. 1979In Thomas v. State, 240 Ga. 393, 401 ( 242 SE2d 1 ) (1977), this court held that mitigating circumstances "are not required to be singled out under Georgia law.” The ninth enumeration of error is . without merit. 10. | 1 | 1 |
Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Harrisgreen2 sentences1976Co. v. Harris, 1 Ga. App. 714, 717 ( 57 SE 1076 ) and Baldwin v. Ga. Automatic Gas Co., 85 Ga. App. 767, 775 ( 70 SE2d 108 ). (3) An interesting proposition is submitted in the ninth enumeration of error in that appellant’s able advocate expressly stated to the court that "I want to except to the law which has been honored for so many years, that is a presumption that doctors have performed their professional functions in accord with proper techniques. 1976Co. v. Harris, 1 Ga. App. 714, 717 ( 57 SE 1076 ) and Baldwin v. Ga. Automatic Gas Co., 85 Ga. App. 767, 775 ( 70 SE2d 108 ). (3) An interesting proposition is submitted in the ninth enumeration of error in that appellant’s able advocate expressly stated to the court that "I want to except to the law which has been honored for so many years, that is a presumption that doctors have performed their professional functions in accord with proper techniques. | 1 | 1 |
Baldwin v. Georgia Automatic Gas Co.green2 sentences1976Co. v. Harris, 1 Ga. App. 714, 717 ( 57 SE 1076 ) and Baldwin v. Ga. Automatic Gas Co., 85 Ga. App. 767, 775 ( 70 SE2d 108 ). (3) An interesting proposition is submitted in the ninth enumeration of error in that appellant’s able advocate expressly stated to the court that "I want to except to the law which has been honored for so many years, that is a presumption that doctors have performed their professional functions in accord with proper techniques. 1976Co. v. Harris, 1 Ga. App. 714, 717 ( 57 SE 1076 ) and Baldwin v. Ga. Automatic Gas Co., 85 Ga. App. 767, 775 ( 70 SE2d 108 ). (3) An interesting proposition is submitted in the ninth enumeration of error in that appellant’s able advocate expressly stated to the court that "I want to except to the law which has been honored for so many years, that is a presumption that doctors have performed their professional functions in accord with proper techniques. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Leniston v. Bonfiglio
green
2 sentences1988“A brief cannot supply an enumeration of error. ‘Enumerations of error cannot be enlarged by means of statements in brief of counsel to include issues not made in the former.’ [Cits.]” Leniston v. Bonfiglio, 138 Ga. App. 151 (2) ( 226 SE2d 1 ) (1976). 1988“A brief cannot supply an enumeration of error. ‘Enumerations of error cannot be enlarged by means of statements in brief of counsel to include issues not made in the former.’ [Cits.]” Leniston v. Bonfiglio, 138 Ga. App. 151 (2) ( 226 SE2d 1 ) (1976). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Tribble v. State
green
2 sentences1984As held in Tribble v. State, 248 Ga. 274 ( 280 SE2d 352 ) (1981), the trial court is not required to conduct an in-camera inspection under a general Brady motion unless the defendant makes such a request after the prosecution has made its response to the motion. 1984As held in Tribble v. State, 248 Ga. 274 ( 280 SE2d 352 ) (1981), the trial court is not required to conduct an in-camera inspection under a general Brady motion unless the defendant makes such a request after the prosecution has made its response to the motion. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Fincher v. Davis
green
2 sentences1976I do that for this reason, that it occurs to me that the theory that doctors or any other persons exercising scientific undertakings of one kind or another are judged by jurors who are ordinary lay people and not by jurors who are doctors and that this presumption has always been unnecessary and one that was never proper at all.” (T. 4002). *638 In our court appellant expressly requests that we overrule a series of cases beginning with Fincher v. Davis, 27 Ga. App. 494 (2) ( 108 SE 905 ) and continuing through Anderson v. Crippen, 122 Ga. App. 27 ( 176 SE2d 196 ). 1976I do that for this reason, that it occurs to me that the theory that doctors or any other persons exercising scientific undertakings of one kind or another are judged by jurors who are ordinary lay people and not by jurors who are doctors and that this presumption has always been unnecessary and one that was never proper at all.” (T. 4002). *638 In our court appellant expressly requests that we overrule a series of cases beginning with Fincher v. Davis, 27 Ga. App. 494 (2) ( 108 SE 905 ) and continuing through Anderson v. Crippen, 122 Ga. App. 27 ( 176 SE2d 196 ). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Anderson v. Crippen
green
2 sentences1976I do that for this reason, that it occurs to me that the theory that doctors or any other persons exercising scientific undertakings of one kind or another are judged by jurors who are ordinary lay people and not by jurors who are doctors and that this presumption has always been unnecessary and one that was never proper at all.” (T. 4002). *638 In our court appellant expressly requests that we overrule a series of cases beginning with Fincher v. Davis, 27 Ga. App. 494 (2) ( 108 SE 905 ) and continuing through Anderson v. Crippen, 122 Ga. App. 27 ( 176 SE2d 196 ). 1976I do that for this reason, that it occurs to me that the theory that doctors or any other persons exercising scientific undertakings of one kind or another are judged by jurors who are ordinary lay people and not by jurors who are doctors and that this presumption has always been unnecessary and one that was never proper at all.” (T. 4002). *638 In our court appellant expressly requests that we overrule a series of cases beginning with Fincher v. Davis, 27 Ga. App. 494 (2) ( 108 SE 905 ) and continuing through Anderson v. Crippen, 122 Ga. App. 27 ( 176 SE2d 196 ). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Roberts v. Mandeville
green
2 sentences1975See Code Ann. §§ 30-220, 30-221; Roberts v. Mandeville, 217 Ga. 90 ( 121 SE2d 150 ) (1961). 1975See Code Ann. §§ 30-220, 30-221; Roberts v. Mandeville, 217 Ga. 90 ( 121 SE2d 150 ) (1961). | 1 | 1975–1975 |