Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McClarity v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See also McClarity v. State, 234 Ga. App. 348, 349 ( 506 SE2d 392 ) (1998) (explaining that “[c]ases requiring the renewal of the objection at trial rely on Hunter v. State, which held only that a lack of similarity argument was not preserved by other objections at the pretrial similar transaction hearing, which objections were simply renewed at trial”) (footnote omitted). 2010See also McClarity v. State, 234 Ga. App. 348, 349 ( 506 SE2d 392 ) (1998) (explaining that “[c]ases requiring the renewal of the objection at trial rely on Hunter v. State, which held only that a lack of similarity argument was not preserved by other objections at the pretrial similar transaction hearing, which objections were simply renewed at trial”) (footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Thaxton v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Failure to conduct a pretrial similar transaction hearing is not necessarily reversible error. “[W]hile it is preferable that the hearing be held before trial, it is not reversible error to conduct the hearing in mid-trial where . . . appellant can show no prejudice suffered from the failure to have the hearing before trial.” Thaxton v. State, 260 Ga. 141, 144 (6) ( 390 SE2d 841 ) (1990). 2008Failure to conduct a pretrial similar transaction hearing is not necessarily reversible error. “[W]hile it is preferable that the hearing be held before trial, it is not reversible error to conduct the hearing in mid-trial where . . . appellant can show no prejudice suffered from the failure to have the hearing before trial.” Thaxton v. State, 260 Ga. 141, 144 (6) ( 390 SE2d 841 ) (1990). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences1999“Although [Parrish] apparently made a lack of similarity objection at the pretrial similar transaction hearing, he waived this ground by failing to make this objection when the similar transaction evidence was introduced at trial.” (Punctuation omitted.) Davis v. State, 229 Ga. App. 787, 789 (2) ( 494 SE2d 702 ) (1997). 1999“Although [Parrish] apparently made a lack of similarity objection at the pretrial similar transaction hearing, he waived this ground by failing to make this objection when the similar transaction evidence was introduced at trial.” (Punctuation omitted.) Davis v. State, 229 Ga. App. 787, 789 (2) ( 494 SE2d 702 ) (1997). | 1 | 1 |
White v. Stategreen2 sentences1997See also White v. State, 225 Ga. App. 74, 75 (2) ( 483 SE2d 329 ) (1997). 1997See also White v. State, 225 Ga. App. 74, 75 (2) ( 483 SE2d 329 ) (1997). | 1 | 1 |
Sapeu v. Stategreen2 sentences1997Although [Davis apparently] made a lack of similarity objection at the pretrial similar transaction hearing, he waived this ground by failing to make this objection when the similar transaction evidence was introduced at trial.” Sapeu v. State, 222 Ga. App. 509, 510 (4) ( 474 SE2d 703 ) (1996). 1997Although [Davis apparently] made a lack of similarity objection at the pretrial similar transaction hearing, he waived this ground by failing to make this objection when the similar transaction evidence was introduced at trial.” Sapeu v. State, 222 Ga. App. 509, 510 (4) ( 474 SE2d 703 ) (1996). | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences1997“In cases where a similar transaction hearing is held pursuant to Uniform Superior Court Rule 31.3 (B), the failure to object to the introduction of the similar transaction evidence at trial waives the issue. [Cit.]” (Emphasis supplied.) Jackson v. State, 223 Ga. App. 207, 208 (1) ( 477 SE2d 347 ) (1996). 1997“In cases where a similar transaction hearing is held pursuant to Uniform Superior Court Rule 31.3 (B), the failure to object to the introduction of the similar transaction evidence at trial waives the issue. [Cit.]” (Emphasis supplied.) Jackson v. State, 223 Ga. App. 207, 208 (1) ( 477 SE2d 347 ) (1996). | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences1996Jackson v. State, 217 Ga. App. 485, 488 (4) (a) ( 458 SE2d 153 ) (1995) (physical precedent only). 1996Jackson v. State, 217 Ga. App. 485, 488 (4) (a) ( 458 SE2d 153 ) (1995) (physical precedent only). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Frost
green
2 sentences2017Following a pretrial similar transaction hearing, the trial court ruled that, in construing Rule 417, the 2006 DUI conviction was *199 admissible, because, per State v. Frost , 297 Ga. 296 , 305, 773 S.E.2d 700 (2015), proof of a prior DUI may strengthen substantially the inference about the presence of an intoxicant. 2017Following a pretrial similar transaction hearing, the trial court ruled that, in construing Rule 417, the 2006 DUI conviction was *199 admissible, because, per State v. Frost , 297 Ga. 296 , 305, 773 S.E.2d 700 (2015), proof of a prior DUI may strengthen substantially the inference about the presence of an intoxicant. | 1 | 2017–2017 |