Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2015I prefer the term ‘equitable inheritance’ because it is more descriptive of the specific relief that ought to be available to claimants in limited circumstances and does not suggest itself as a basis for other rights and duties associated with adoption.”); Johnson v. Johnson, 617 NW2d 97, 101 (N.D. 2000) (“The doctrine of equitable adoption, despite its name, bears almost no relationship to a statutory legal adoption.”). 4 With regard to this interaction between legal and equitable relief, we note that Shalanda continues to seek legal relief under OCGA § 19-7-20 (a), even though, as the trial 2015I prefer the term ‘equitable inheritance’ because it is more descriptive of the specific relief that ought to be available to claimants in limited circumstances and does not suggest itself as a basis for other rights and duties associated with adoption.”); Johnson v. Johnson, 617 NW2d 97, 101 (N.D. 2000) (“The doctrine of equitable adoption, despite its name, bears almost no relationship to a statutory legal adoption.”). 4 With regard to this interaction between legal and equitable relief, we note that Shalanda continues to seek legal relief under OCGA § 19-7-20 (a), even though, as the trial | 2 | 2 |
In re Estate of William J. Hannifingreen2 sentences2015See Hill v. Nakai (In re Estate of Hannifin), 311 P3d 1016, 1027, n. 4 (Utah 2013) (Durham, J., dissenting) (“The presence of the word ‘adoption’ in the phrase ‘equitable adoption’falsely suggests a relationship between this doctrine and statutory adoption. 2015See Hill v. Nakai (In re Estate of Hannifin), 311 P3d 1016, 1027, n. 4 (Utah 2013) (Durham, J., dissenting) (“The presence of the word ‘adoption’ in the phrase ‘equitable adoption’ falsely suggests a relationship between this doctrine and statutory adoption. | 2 | 2 |
Berman v. Rubingreen2 sentences1994Auth. v. Beaver, 179 Ga. App. 200, 201-202 ( 345 SE2d 904 ); Berman v. Rubin, 138 Ga. App. 849, 853 ( 227 SE2d 802 )), and the presumption that professionals perform their professional services in an ordinarily *706 skillful manner. 1994Auth. v. Beaver, 179 Ga. App. 200, 201-202 ( 345 SE2d 904 ); Berman v. Rubin, 138 Ga. App. 849, 853 ( 227 SE2d 802 )), and the presumption that professionals perform their professional services in an ordinarily *706 skillful manner. | 1 | 1 |
Cherokee County Hospital Authority v. Beavergreen2 sentences1994Auth. v. Beaver, 179 Ga. App. 200, 201-202 ( 345 SE2d 904 ); Berman v. Rubin, 138 Ga. App. 849, 853 ( 227 SE2d 802 )), and the presumption that professionals perform their professional services in an ordinarily *706 skillful manner. 1994Auth. v. Beaver, 179 Ga. App. 200, 201-202 ( 345 SE2d 904 ); Berman v. Rubin, 138 Ga. App. 849, 853 ( 227 SE2d 802 )), and the presumption that professionals perform their professional services in an ordinarily *706 skillful manner. | 1 | 1 |
Pope v. City of Atlantagreen1 sentence1982III, § 2, and the relationship between that claim and the state claim permits the conclusion that the entire action before the court comprises but one constitutional “case.” The federal claim must have substance sufficient to confer subject matter jurisdiction on the court. [Cit.]...’ [Cit.]” Pope, 240 Ga. at 179, fn. 2 , supra. Thus, a federal court has pendent jurisdiction over a state claim not otherwise cognizable in that tribunal if and only if it has jurisdiction over the federal claim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin
green
2 sentences1980Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 289 U. S. 103 ... 1977Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 289 U. S. 103 . . . | 2 | 1977–1980 |
United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
red
2 sentences1982III, § 2, and the relationship between that claim and the state claim permits the conclusion that the entire action before the court comprises but one constitutional ‘case.’ ” United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, supra at 725 . 1982In order for the federal and state questions to be considered as one “case,” the federal question must be sufficiently substantial to confer subject matter jurisdiction, and the federal and state claims “must derive from a common nucleus of operative fact.” Id. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.