Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State of Iowa v. Travis Howard Richard Beckgreen1 sentence2023He instead asks us to extend the holding of Gaskins to apply to “all warrantless automobile searches when the occupants of the vehicle no longer 8 present an exigent circumstances type of issue.” He urges the court to expand the reasoning of Gaskins “to all warrantless vehicle searches, at least when the occupants are in custody.” But “[w]e are not at liberty to overrule controlling supreme court precedent.” State v. Beck, 854 N.W.2d 56, 64 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
State Of Iowa Vs. Joshua Daniel Fleminggreen1 sentence2015“The State has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the search falls within an exception.” State v. Fleming, 790 N.W.2d 560, 568 (Iowa 2010). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Taguegreen1 sentence2010The State, however, does not even argue that there is an applicable exception that would allow the officers’ warrantless search of Fleming’s bedroom, nor viewing the totality of the circumstances can we find one. 4 Because we find the officers unreasonably invaded Fleming’s protected interest in his bedroom, and therefore violated his right to be free from unreasonable search and seizures under article I, section 8 of the Iowa Constitution, 5 the evidence of marijuana found in his bedroom must be suppressed. 6 State v. Tagne, 676 N.W.2d 197, 206 (Iowa 2004) (holding all evidence flowing from a | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cadottegreen1 sentence2000See id. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Folkensgreen1 sentence1989State v. Folkens, 281 N.W.2d 1, 3 (Iowa 1979). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cline
green
2 sentences2010“The State has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the search falls within an exception.” Cline, 617 N.W.2d at 282 . 2004“The State has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the search falls within an exception.” Cline, 617 N.W.2d at 282 . | 2 | 2004–2010 |
Carpenter v. United States
green
1 sentence2026Id. at 316–17; 7 Flippo v. West Virginia, 528 U.S. 11 , 13–14 (1999) (per curiam) (“A warrantless search by the police is invalid unless it falls within one of the narrow and well- delineated exceptions to the warrant requirement . . . .” (citation omitted)). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Flippo v. West Virginia
green
1 sentence2026Id. at 316–17; 7 Flippo v. West Virginia, 528 U.S. 11 , 13–14 (1999) (per curiam) (“A warrantless search by the police is invalid unless it falls within one of the narrow and well- delineated exceptions to the warrant requirement . . . .” (citation omitted)). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.