Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1896–1980 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Walker v. Sedrelgreen2 sentences1980See Walker v. Sedrel, 260 Iowa 625, 632 , 149 N.W.2d 874, 878 (1967); Hamilton v. Becker, 249 Iowa 516, 521 , 86 N.W.2d 142, 145 (1957); Mongar v. Barnard, 248 Iowa 899, 915 , 82 N.W.2d 765, 775 (1957). 1980See Walker v. Sedrel, 260 Iowa 625, 632 , 149 N.W.2d 874, 878 (1967); Hamilton v. Becker, 249 Iowa 516, 521 , 86 N.W.2d 142, 145 (1957); Mongar v. Barnard, 248 Iowa 899, 915 , 82 N.W.2d 765, 775 (1957). | 1 | 1 |
Mongar Ex Rel. Mongar v. Barnardgreen2 sentences1980See Walker v. Sedrel, 260 Iowa 625, 632 , 149 N.W.2d 874, 878 (1967); Hamilton v. Becker, 249 Iowa 516, 521 , 86 N.W.2d 142, 145 (1957); Mongar v. Barnard, 248 Iowa 899, 915 , 82 N.W.2d 765, 775 (1957). 1980See Walker v. Sedrel, 260 Iowa 625, 632 , 149 N.W.2d 874, 878 (1967); Hamilton v. Becker, 249 Iowa 516, 521 , 86 N.W.2d 142, 145 (1957); Mongar v. Barnard, 248 Iowa 899, 915 , 82 N.W.2d 765, 775 (1957). | 1 | 1 |
Hamilton v. Beckergreen2 sentences1980See Walker v. Sedrel, 260 Iowa 625, 632 , 149 N.W.2d 874, 878 (1967); Hamilton v. Becker, 249 Iowa 516, 521 , 86 N.W.2d 142, 145 (1957); Mongar v. Barnard, 248 Iowa 899, 915 , 82 N.W.2d 765, 775 (1957). 1980See Walker v. Sedrel, 260 Iowa 625, 632 , 149 N.W.2d 874, 878 (1967); Hamilton v. Becker, 249 Iowa 516, 521 , 86 N.W.2d 142, 145 (1957); Mongar v. Barnard, 248 Iowa 899, 915 , 82 N.W.2d 765, 775 (1957). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hearns v. Waterbury Hospital
green
2 sentences1939Some of the decisions which support this theory, notably, Hearns v. Waterbury Hospital, 66 Conn. 98 , 33 A. 595 , 603 , 31 L.R.A. 224 , speak of the respondeat superior rule as at times a hard rule, resting on public policy, and that it should not be extended to institutions of charity. 1939Some of the decisions which support this theory, notably, Hearns v. Waterbury Hospital, 66 Conn. 98 , 33 A. 595 , 603 , 31 L.R.A. 224 , speak of the respondeat superior rule as at times a hard rule, resting on public policy, and that it should not be extended to institutions of charity. | 2 | 1939–1939 |
Danels v. Farm Property Mutual Insurance
neutral
2 sentences1971Danels v. Farm Property Mutual Insurance Co. (1931), 213 Iowa 352, 353 , 239 N.W. 24, 25 ; Stoltenberg v. Continental Ins. 1971Danels v. Farm Property Mutual Insurance Co. (1931), 213 Iowa 352, 353 , 239 N.W. 24, 25 ; Stoltenberg v. Continental Ins. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Limburg v. German Fire Insurance
green
1 sentence1971In the leading case of Limburg v. German Fire Insurance Company (1894), 90 Iowa 709, 711 , 57 N.W. 626 , 627, the court states: “It is said that occupancy implies an actual use of a dwelling house as a dwelling place; that the insurer has a right, by the terms of such a policy, to the care and supervision which would be involved in such an occupancy.” It is this thought the instruction should convey. | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Sergeant v. Challis
green
1 sentence1932Once more appellant refers to Sergeant v. Challis ( 213 Iowa 57 ), supra. There this court said, on page 65: *231 “It is the duty of all persons using the highway to comply with this provision of the statutory law; but, if it appears from all of the evidence to the satisfaction of the jury, that they could not reasonably do so, or that they have exercised ordinary care, — that is, such care as an ordinarily careful and prudent person in the same circumstances would have exercised in this respect, — then they are absolved from the statutory duty, and the presumption or primafacie case of neglig | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Cook v. Fogarty
neutral
1 sentence1921Appellant cites the statute and Baker v. Zimmerman, 179 Iowa 272, 282 ; Cook v. Fogarty, 103 Iowa 500, 504 . | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Baker v. Zimmerman
green
1 sentence1921Appellant cites the statute and Baker v. Zimmerman, 179 Iowa 272, 282 ; Cook v. Fogarty, 103 Iowa 500, 504 . | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Drake v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.
neutral
1 sentence1896In Drake v. Railway Co., 70 Iowa, 63 ( 29 N. W. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.