Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Meier v. SENECAUT IIIgreen1 sentence2017See Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 537 (Iowa 2002) (ruling it is not a sensible exercise of appellate review to resolve an issue without the benefit of a lower court determination). | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Aki Malik Rossgreen1 sentence2017WRIT ANNULLED. 3 In his appellate brief, Wells notes his motion cited the cases of Velez, 829 N.W.2d at 584 , and State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 706 (Iowa 2014), in support of his motion and those cases involve complex factual merger issues. | 1 | 1 |
Watson Laboratories, Inc. v. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc.green1 sentence2008See, e.g., Watson Labs., Inc. v. *441 Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., 178 F.Supp.2d 1099, 1110 (C.D.Cal. 2001) (stating if there is no evidence that the force majeure events were specifically negotiated by the parties, the common law meaning of force majeure is read into the contract). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Gary Allen Lott, United States of America v. Johnny Marton Lott, AKA Johnny Martin Lottgreen1 sentence2007AFFIRMED. 8To prove a “total breakdown,” the defendant must show a “ ‘severe and pervasive conflict with his attorney or evidence that he had such minimal contact with the attorney that meaningful communication was not possible.’ ” Tejeda, 677 N.W.2d at 752 (quoting United States v. Lott, 310 F.3d 1231, 1249 (10th Cir. 2002)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cullengreen2 sentences1989In State v. Cullen, 357 N.W.2d 24, 27 (Iowa 1984), we formulated a three-part test gleaned from our previous opinions that must be met to impeach a verdict on the basis of jury misconduct. 1989In State v. Cullen, 357 N.W.2d 24, 27 (Iowa 1984), we formulated a three-part test gleaned from our previous opinions that must be met to impeach a verdict on the basis of jury misconduct. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Tejeda
green
2 sentences2007Judges who receive from a defendant a request for substitute counsel on account of an alleged breakdown in communication have a “duty of inquiry.” Tejeda, 677 N.W.2d at 749–50. 2007AFFIRMED. 8To prove a “total breakdown,” the defendant must show a “ ‘severe and pervasive conflict with his attorney or evidence that he had such minimal contact with the attorney that meaningful communication was not possible.’ ” Tejeda, 677 N.W.2d at 752 (quoting United States v. Lott, 310 F.3d 1231, 1249 (10th Cir. 2002)). | 2 | 2007–2007 |
State of Iowa v. Valentin Velez
green
1 sentence2017WRIT ANNULLED. 3 In his appellate brief, Wells notes his motion cited the cases of Velez, 829 N.W.2d at 584 , and State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 706 (Iowa 2014), in support of his motion and those cases involve complex factual merger issues. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Clarke
green
1 sentence2017Wells’s claim is based on his belief that the double jeopardy clause requires the willful injury convictions to merge into the attempted murder conviction.2 This merger argument has been rejected by the Iowa Supreme Court in Clark, 475 N.W.2d at 195–96: “[W]e see nothing to prevent the State from charging and convicting an individual for both attempting to murder and, at the same time, willfully injuring a victim. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Wells
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 217 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.