7 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1981–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sullivan v. Allstate Insurancegreen2 sentences1990(Emphasis added.) In Sullivan I, 111 Idaho 304, 306 , 723 P.2d 848, 850 (1986), this Court, in a unanimous opinion, affirmed Judge Magnuson's dismissal with prejudice, stating: *907 Under the circumstances of today's case we need not decide the legal relationship which exists between an insured and an insurance carrier when the injured makes a claim under an uninsured motorist clause of an insurance policy, i.e., whether that relationship is adversarial or fiduciary... . 1990(Emphasis added.) In Sullivan I, 111 Idaho 304, 306 , 723 P.2d 848, 850 (1986), this Court, in a unanimous opinion, affirmed Judge Magnuson's dismissal with prejudice, stating: *907 Under the circumstances of today's case we need not decide the legal relationship which exists between an insured and an insurance carrier when the injured makes a claim under an uninsured motorist clause of an insurance policy, i.e., whether that relationship is adversarial or fiduciary... . | 2 | 2 |
Sullivan v. Allstate Insurancegreen2 sentences2010Co. (“Sullivan II ”), 117 Idaho 880, 882 , 792 P.2d 905, 907 (1990) (emphasis added) (quoting Sullivan v. Allstate Ins. 2010Co. (“Sullivan II ”), 117 Idaho 880, 882 , 792 P.2d 905, 907 (1990) (emphasis added) (quoting Sullivan v. Allstate Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Emery v. United Pacific Insurancegreen2 sentences1999Co., where the Court upheld an award of prejudgment interest on the entire award under an uninsured motorist clause. 120 Idaho 244, 247 , 815 P.2d 442, 445 (1991). 1999Co., where the Court upheld an award of prejudgment interest on the entire award under an uninsured motorist clause. 120 Idaho 244, 247 , 815 P.2d 442, 445 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
Federated American Insurance v. Raynesgreen2 sentences1986Co. v. Raynes, 88 Wash.2d 439 , 563 P.2d 815, 820 (1977). (3) “Provision of uninsured motorist clause excluding coverage for bodily injury sustained while occupying a highway vehicle owned by the named insured but not listed in the policy was void was contrary to public policy; hence, clause could not be used to deny coverage for injuries sustained by named insured’s stepson, who was a resident of the same household and who was injured while riding as a passenger on a motorcycle, the title to which was either in the stepfather or his mother but which was not listed as an insured vehicle.” Head 1986Co. v. Raynes, 88 Wash.2d 439 , 563 P.2d 815, 820 (1977). (3) “Provision of uninsured motorist clause excluding coverage for bodily injury sustained while occupying a highway vehicle owned by the named insured but not listed in the policy was void was contrary to public policy; hence, clause could not be used to deny coverage for injuries sustained by named insured’s stepson, who was a resident of the same household and who was injured while riding as a passenger on a motorcycle, the title to which was either in the stepfather or his mother but which was not listed as an insured vehicle.” Head | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Medical-Dental Service, Inc. v. Boroo
green
2 sentences1981"Further, the definition of funds `reasonably recoverable' for the foregoing reasons would also include an uninsured motorist policy payment. " Damages for bodily injury under the Farmers Insurance Policy would also include special damages, such as hospital and medical expenses and the identical matters covered by the MSB master policy." (Emphasis added.) *883 In Boroo this Court noted: "The uninsured motorist clause obligated Farmers to pay appellants `all damages' legally due them from an uninsured motorist `because of bodily injury sustained' in an accident with the uninsured motorist." 92 1981"Further, the definition of funds `reasonably recoverable' for the foregoing reasons would also include an uninsured motorist policy payment. " Damages for bodily injury under the Farmers Insurance Policy would also include special damages, such as hospital and medical expenses and the identical matters covered by the MSB master policy." (Emphasis added.) *883 In Boroo this Court noted: "The uninsured motorist clause obligated Farmers to pay appellants `all damages' legally due them from an uninsured motorist `because of bodily injury sustained' in an accident with the uninsured motorist." 92 | 2 | 1981–1981 |
Vaught v. Dairyland Insurance
green
2 sentences2010Vaught, 131 Idaho at 362 , 956 P.2d at 679 . 2010Vaught, 131 Idaho at 362 , 956 P.2d at 679 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Cothren Ex Rel. Grissom v. Emcasco Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1986Co. v. Raynes, 88 Wash.2d 439 , 563 P.2d 815, 820 (1977). (3) "Provision of uninsured motorist clause excluding coverage for bodily injury sustained while occupying a highway vehicle owned by the named insured but not listed in the policy was void was contrary to public policy; hence, clause could not be used to deny coverage for injuries sustained by named insured's stepson, who was a resident of the same household and who was injured while riding as a passenger on a motorcycle, the title to which was either in the stepfather or his mother but which was not listed as an insured vehicle." Head 1986Co. v. Raynes, 88 Wash.2d 439 , 563 P.2d 815, 820 (1977). (3) “Provision of uninsured motorist clause excluding coverage for bodily injury sustained while occupying a highway vehicle owned by the named insured but not listed in the policy was void was contrary to public policy; hence, clause could not be used to deny coverage for injuries sustained by named insured’s stepson, who was a resident of the same household and who was injured while riding as a passenger on a motorcycle, the title to which was either in the stepfather or his mother but which was not listed as an insured vehicle.” Head | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.