Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 1970–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Farrgreen2 sentences2010Id. at 381 . 2005No explicit reference to an uninsured-motorist claim is made. * * * Because of the inclusion in the release of this .specific language relating to workers’ compensation and the exclusion of any such specific reference to the uninsured-motorists claims, the effect of the release is unclear.” Id. | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
green
2 sentences1978Co., 106 R.I. 311 , 259 A.2d 408 (1969), and Poulos v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., R.I., 379 A.2d 362 (1977), the insurers sought to invoke a limitation of liability proviso which said that the sum due under the uninsured motorist clause could be reduced by the amount of workmen's compensation or similar benefits previously received by the insured. 1978Co., 106 R.I. 311 , 259 A.2d 408 (1969), and Poulos v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., R.I., 379 A.2d 362 (1977), the insurers sought to invoke a limitation of liability proviso which said that the sum due under the uninsured motorist clause could be reduced by the amount of workmen's compensation or similar benefits previously received by the insured. | 2 | 1970–1978 |
W.P. Associates v. Forcier, Inc.
green
2 sentences2009Associates, 637 A.2d at 356 -57 (quoting Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Farr, 594 A.2d 379, 381 (R.I. 1991)). [17] The holding in W.P. 2009Associates, 637 A.2d at 356 -57 (quoting Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Fair, 594 A.2d 379, 381 (R.I.1991)). . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Sands v. Pa. Ins. Guaranty Ass'n
red
1 sentence1999Sands, 423 A.2d at 1228 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Church v. McBurney
green
1 sentence1989However, “injuries to the person” does not apply to actions for attorney malpractice, Church v. McBurney, 513 A.2d 22 (R.I.1986), or to actions seeking recovery under an uninsured-motorist clause of an insurance policy, Pickering v. American Employees Insurance Co., 109 R.I. 143 , 282 A.2d 584 (1971). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Pickering v. American Employers Insurance
green
2 sentences1989However, “injuries to the person” does not apply to actions for attorney malpractice, Church v. McBurney, 513 A.2d 22 (R.I.1986), or to actions seeking recovery under an uninsured-motorist clause of an insurance policy, Pickering v. American Employees Insurance Co., 109 R.I. 143 , 282 A.2d 584 (1971). 1989However, “injuries to the person” does not apply to actions for attorney malpractice, Church v. McBurney, 513 A.2d 22 (R.I.1986), or to actions seeking recovery under an uninsured-motorist clause of an insurance policy, Pickering v. American Employees Insurance Co., 109 R.I. 143 , 282 A.2d 584 (1971). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. v. Becton
green
2 sentences1985This court stated that “[a]n agreement between the parties to resolve their conflict concerning an uninsured motorist by arbitration is not destructive of the Superior Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. * * * Compliance with a condition precedent to coverage under an uninsured-motorist clause is a question for the court, and not for the arbitrators, to determine.” Id., 475 A.2d at 1035 . 1985This court stated that “[a]n agreement between the parties to resolve their conflict concerning an uninsured motorist by arbitration is not destructive of the Superior Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. * * * Compliance with a condition precedent to coverage under an uninsured-motorist clause is a question for the court, and not for the arbitrators, to determine.” Id., 475 A.2d at 1035 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Poulos v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
green
2 sentences1978Co., 106 R.I. 311 , 259 A.2d 408 (1969), and Poulos v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., R.I., 379 A.2d 362 (1977), the insurers sought to invoke a limitation of liability proviso which said that the sum due under the uninsured motorist clause could be reduced by the amount of workmen's compensation or similar benefits previously received by the insured. 1978Co., 106 R.I. 311 , 259 A.2d 408 (1969), and Poulos v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., 119 R.I. 409 , 379 A.2d 362 (1977), the insurers sought to invoke a limitation of liability proviso which said that the sum due under the uninsured motorist clause could be reduced by the amount of workman’s compensation or similar benefits previously received by the insured. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.