Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 3 courts 1891–1941 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Sterling v. Merrillgreen1 sentence1891See City of Sterling v. Merrill, 124 Ill. 522 ; C., R. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Kirkpatrick
green
2 sentences1941Kirkpatrick, 9 Wheaton, 720 ; Story on Agency, 9 Ed. Sec. 319; Belt vs. 1938Kirkpatrick, 9 Wheaton, 720 ; Story on Agency, 9 Ed., Sec. 319; Johnson vs. | 3 | 1937–1941 |
The People v. Nelson
neutral
1 sentence1936(People v. Nelson, 360 Ill. 562 ; People v. Dameron, 346 id. 408.) In the cases announcing this rule the testimony of the prosecutrix was either uncorroborated or incredible, while that of the defendant was corroborated or tended to prove an alibi. | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Town of Waltham v. Kemper
neutral
1 sentence1930Among the many cases announcing this rule are the following: Town of Waltham v. Kemper, 55 Ill. 346 ; Elmore v. Drainage Comrs. 135 Ill. 269 ; Symonds v. Clay County, 71 Ill. 355 ; Town of Odell v. Schroeder, 58 Ill. 353 ; Wilcox v. City of Chicago, 107 Ill. 334 ; Nagle v. Wakey, 161 Ill. 387 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
President of Odell v. Schroeder
neutral
1 sentence1930Among the many cases announcing this rule are the following: Town of Waltham v. Kemper, 55 Ill. 346 ; Elmore v. Drainage Comrs. 135 Ill. 269 ; Symonds v. Clay County, 71 Ill. 355 ; Town of Odell v. Schroeder, 58 Ill. 353 ; Wilcox v. City of Chicago, 107 Ill. 334 ; Nagle v. Wakey, 161 Ill. 387 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Symonds v. Board of Supervisors
neutral
1 sentence1930Among the many cases announcing this rule are the following: Town of Waltham v. Kemper, 55 Ill. 346 ; Elmore v. Drainage Comrs. 135 Ill. 269 ; Symonds v. Clay County, 71 Ill. 355 ; Town of Odell v. Schroeder, 58 Ill. 353 ; Wilcox v. City of Chicago, 107 Ill. 334 ; Nagle v. Wakey, 161 Ill. 387 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Wilcox v. City of Chicago
green
1 sentence1930Among the many cases announcing this rule are the following: Town of Waltham v. Kemper, 55 Ill. 346 ; Elmore v. Drainage Comrs. 135 Ill. 269 ; Symonds v. Clay County, 71 Ill. 355 ; Town of Odell v. Schroeder, 58 Ill. 353 ; Wilcox v. City of Chicago, 107 Ill. 334 ; Nagle v. Wakey, 161 Ill. 387 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Elmore v. Drainage Commissioners
green
1 sentence1930Among the many cases announcing this rule are the following: Town of Waltham v. Kemper, 55 Ill. 346 ; Elmore v. Drainage Comrs. 135 Ill. 269 ; Symonds v. Clay County, 71 Ill. 355 ; Town of Odell v. Schroeder, 58 Ill. 353 ; Wilcox v. City of Chicago, 107 Ill. 334 ; Nagle v. Wakey, 161 Ill. 387 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Nagle v. Wakey
green
1 sentence1930Among the many cases announcing this rule are the following: Town of Waltham v. Kemper, 55 Ill. 346 ; Elmore v. Drainage Comrs. 135 Ill. 269 ; Symonds v. Clay County, 71 Ill. 355 ; Town of Odell v. Schroeder, 58 Ill. 353 ; Wilcox v. City of Chicago, 107 Ill. 334 ; Nagle v. Wakey, 161 Ill. 387 . | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Gaynor v. Hibernia Savings Bank
neutral
1 sentence1919Bank, 166 Ill. 577 , it was said: “The only error alleged is that the court erred in striking the plea from the files, and it has been repeatedly held that such action of the court cannot be considered unless the motion, decision and an exception thereto are presented in a bill of exceptions, so that the error, if any, may appear from the record.” The cases announcing this rule are so numerous that any further citation of them is unnecessary. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.