Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package MacHinery Co.green2 sentences2012Thereafter, “[a]ny defendant who pays damages in an amount greater than his or her proportionate share of fault can *** seek contribution under the Contribution Act.” Id. ¶ 40 Turning to contribution, in Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package Machinery Co., 70 Ill. 2d 1, 15 (1977), the supreme court adopted the doctrine of contribution among joint tortfeasors. 2000The Contribution Act codified the decision in Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package Machinery Co., 70 Ill. 2d 1 , 374 N.E.2d 437 (1977), wherein the supreme court adopted the doctrine of contribution among joint tortfeasors. | 2 | 6 |
Stephens v. McBridegreen2 sentences2000Stephens v. McBride, 97 Ill. 2d 515, 521-22 , 455 N.E.2d 54, 58 (1983). 2000Stephens v. McBride, 97 Ill. 2d 515, 521-22 , 455 N.E.2d 54, 58 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Unzicker v. Kraft Food Ingredients Corp.
green
1 sentence2012Thereafter, “[a]ny defendant who pays damages in an amount greater than his or her proportionate share of fault can *** seek contribution under the Contribution Act.” Id. ¶ 40 Turning to contribution, in Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package Machinery Co., 70 Ill. 2d 1, 15 (1977), the supreme court adopted the doctrine of contribution among joint tortfeasors. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Alvis v. Ribar
yellow
2 sentences1993See Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package Machine Co. (1977), 70 Ill.2d 1 , 15 Ill.Dec. 829 , 374 N.E.2d 437 (adopting the doctrine of contribution among joint tortfeasors); Alvis v. Ribar (1981), 85 Ill.2d 1 , 52 Ill.Dec. 23 , 421 N.E.2d 886 (adopting pure comparative negligence); and Elg v. Whittington (1987), 119 Ill.2d 344 , 116 Ill.Dec. 252 , 518 N.E.2d 1232 (holding that the 30 day time limit during which to perfect an appeal after a 304(a) finding was from the date of the finding). 1993See Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package Machine Co. (1977), 70 Ill.2d 1 , 15 Ill.Dec. 829 , 374 N.E.2d 437 (adopting the doctrine of contribution among joint tortfeasors); Alvis v. Ribar (1981), 85 Ill.2d 1 , 52 Ill.Dec. 23 , 421 N.E.2d 886 (adopting pure comparative negligence); and Elg v. Whittington (1987), 119 Ill.2d 344 , 116 Ill.Dec. 252 , 518 N.E.2d 1232 (holding that the 30 day time limit during which to perfect an appeal after a 304(a) finding was from the date of the finding). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Elg v. Whittington
green
2 sentences1993See Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package Machine Co. (1977), 70 Ill.2d 1 , 15 Ill.Dec. 829 , 374 N.E.2d 437 (adopting the doctrine of contribution among joint tortfeasors); Alvis v. Ribar (1981), 85 Ill.2d 1 , 52 Ill.Dec. 23 , 421 N.E.2d 886 (adopting pure comparative negligence); and Elg v. Whittington (1987), 119 Ill.2d 344 , 116 Ill.Dec. 252 , 518 N.E.2d 1232 (holding that the 30 day time limit during which to perfect an appeal after a 304(a) finding was from the date of the finding). 1993See Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package Machine Co. (1977), 70 Ill.2d 1 , 15 Ill.Dec. 829 , 374 N.E.2d 437 (adopting the doctrine of contribution among joint tortfeasors); Alvis v. Ribar (1981), 85 Ill.2d 1 , 52 Ill.Dec. 23 , 421 N.E.2d 886 (adopting pure comparative negligence); and Elg v. Whittington (1987), 119 Ill.2d 344 , 116 Ill.Dec. 252 , 518 N.E.2d 1232 (holding that the 30 day time limit during which to perfect an appeal after a 304(a) finding was from the date of the finding). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Balmes v. Hiab-Foco, A.B.
green
1 sentence1987(Raimes v. Hiab-Foco, A.B. (1982), 105 Ill. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Southpark Square, Ltd. v. City of Jackson
green
1 sentence1987Ed. 2d 787 , 98 S. Ct. 2849 , wherein our supreme court adopted the doctrine of contribution among joint tortfeasors. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.