Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Juan Sanchez-Cervantes, AKA Hugo Quirox, Quiroc, Quiroz, Quiroz Trejo, and Quiroz Tapiagreen2 sentences2004A defendant raising an Apprendi claim on appeal is simply complaining that he received a sentence in excess of the normal sentencing range, without the fact or facts necessary to permit such sentence having been proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt." De La Paz, 204 Ill.2d at 436-37 , 274 Ill.Dec. 397 , 791 N.E.2d 489 , citing United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 671 (9th Cir.2002). 2004A defendant raising an Apprendi claim on appeal is simply complaining that he received a sentence in excess of the normal sentencing range, without the fact or facts necessary to permit such sentence having been proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.” De La Paz , 204 Ill. 2d at 436-37 , citing United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes , 282 F.3d 664, 671 (9th Cir. 2002). | 7 | 7 |
People v. Leegreen2 sentences2004"Decisions that announce a new constitutional rule are generally not applied retroactively." People v. Lee, 326 Ill.App.3d 882, 887 , 260 Ill.Dec. 752 , 762 N.E.2d 18 (2001), citing People v. Moore, 177 Ill.2d 421 , 226 Ill.Dec. 804 , 686 N.E.2d 587 (1997). 2004“Decisions that announce a new constitutional rule are generally not applied retroactively.” People v. Lee , 326 Ill. | 2 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. De La Paz
green
2 sentences2004A defendant raising an Apprendi claim on appeal is simply complaining that he received a sentence in excess of the normal sentencing range, without the fact or facts necessary to permit such sentence having been proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt." De La Paz, 204 Ill.2d at 436-37 , 274 Ill.Dec. 397 , 791 N.E.2d 489 , citing United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes, 282 F.3d 664, 671 (9th Cir.2002). 2004A defendant raising an Apprendi claim on appeal is simply complaining that he received a sentence in excess of the normal sentencing range, without the fact or facts necessary to permit such sentence having been proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.” De La Paz , 204 Ill. 2d at 436-37 , citing United States v. Sanchez-Cervantes , 282 F.3d 664, 671 (9th Cir. 2002). | 3 | 2002–2004 |
People v. Moore
green
2 sentences2004"Decisions that announce a new constitutional rule are generally not applied retroactively." People v. Lee, 326 Ill.App.3d 882, 887 , 260 Ill.Dec. 752 , 762 N.E.2d 18 (2001), citing People v. Moore, 177 Ill.2d 421 , 226 Ill.Dec. 804 , 686 N.E.2d 587 (1997). 2004"Decisions that announce a new constitutional rule are generally not applied retroactively." People v. Lee, 326 Ill.App.3d 882, 887 , 260 Ill.Dec. 752 , 762 N.E.2d 18 (2001), citing People v. Moore, 177 Ill.2d 421 , 226 Ill.Dec. 804 , 686 N.E.2d 587 (1997). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.