7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Tousignant
green
2 sentences2020Id. ¶ 50 Rule 604(a) reads: “(a) Appeals by the State -9- (1) When State May Appeal. 2020Id. ¶ 50 Rule 604(a) reads: “(a) Appeals by the State (1) When State May Appeal. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Butler
green
2 sentences2001Ill The defendant, citing People v. Butler, 58 Ill. 2d 45 , 317 N.E.2d 35 (1974), next contends that continued attempts to impeach him with evidence depicting bad character was improper and denied him a fair trial. 2001Ill The defendant, citing People v. Butler, 58 Ill. 2d 45 , 317 N.E.2d 35 (1974), next contends that continued attempts to impeach him with evidence depicting bad character was improper and denied him a fair trial. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
West v. Deere & Co.
green
2 sentences1993(West v. Deere & Co. (1991), 145 Ill. 2d 177, 182 , 582 N.E.2d 685, 687 .) A plaintiff may not survive summary judgment on an issue on which he has the burden of proof by arguing that defendant must negate the plaintiff’s case. 1993(West v. Deere & Co. (1991), 145 Ill. 2d 177, 182 , 582 N.E.2d 685, 687 .) A plaintiff may not survive summary judgment on an issue on which he has the burden of proof by arguing that defendant must negate the plaintiff’s case. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1988The evidence was admitted without objection from defense counsel, and the defendant argues here that the introduction of the evidence was plain error, and, alternatively, that counsel’s failure to make an appropriate objection constituted ineffective assistance under Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668 , 80 L. 1988The evidence was admitted without objection from defense counsel, and the defendant argues here that the introduction of the evidence was plain error, and, alternatively, that counsel’s failure to make an appropriate objection constituted ineffective assistance under Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668 , 80 L. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
People v. Madison
green
2 sentences1981The defendant cites People v. Madison (1974), 56 Ill. 2d 476 , 309 N.E.2d 11 , in which our supreme court held that impeachment of the defendant should be by means of the record of conviction or by an authenticated copy. 1981The defendant cites People v. Madison (1974), 56 Ill. 2d 476 , 309 N.E.2d 11 , in which our supreme court held that impeachment of the defendant should be by means of the record of conviction or by an authenticated copy. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
People v. Clark
green
2 sentences1981The defendant relies on People v. Clark (1972), 52 Ill. 2d 374 , 288 N.E.2d 363 , which held that a witness may not testify as to out-of-court statements he made for the purpose of corroborating his in-court testimony. 1981The defendant relies on People v. Clark (1972), 52 Ill. 2d 374 , 288 N.E.2d 363 , which held that a witness may not testify as to out-of-court statements he made for the purpose of corroborating his in-court testimony. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.