motion without hearing (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

motion without hearing in Illinois

7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1927–2023 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Johnsongreen
ill · 2002 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
2 sentences

2012Reasonable *1156 notice of the motion shall be served upon the State. (b) The defendant must present a prima facie case that: (1) identity was the issue in the trial which resulted in his or her conviction; and (2) the evidence to be tested has been subject to a chain of custody sufficient to establish that it has not been substituted, tampered with, replaced, or altered in any material aspect. (c) The trial court shall allow the testing under reasonable conditions designed to protect the State's interests in the integrity of the evidence and the testing process upon a determination that: (1)

2012Reasonable *1156 notice of the motion shall be served upon the State. (b) The defendant must present a prima facie case that: (1) identity was the issue in the trial which resulted in his or her conviction; and (2) the evidence to be tested has been subject to a chain of custody sufficient to establish that it has not been substituted, tampered with, replaced, or altered in any material aspect. (c) The trial court shall allow the testing under reasonable conditions designed to protect the State's interests in the integrity of the evidence and the testing process upon a determination that: (1)

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Bingham green
illappct · 2006
2 sentences

2021Id.

2020Id.

22020–2021
PNC Bank, National Ass'n v. Kusmierz green
ill · 2022
2 sentences

2023PNC Bank, National Association v. Kusmierz, 2022 IL 126606, ¶ 25 . “ ‘The doctrine is grounded in the equitable notion that courts are reluctant to come to the aid of a party who has knowingly slept on his rights to the detriment of the opposing party.’ ” Id.

2023PNC Bank, National Association v. Kusmierz, 2022 IL 126606, ¶ 25 . “ ‘The doctrine is grounded in the equitable notion that courts are reluctant to come to the aid of a party who has knowingly slept on his rights to the detriment of the opposing party.’ ” Id.

12023–2023
Kent v. United States green
scotus · 1966
2 sentences

1972Relying on Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 , 16 L.Ed.2d 84 , 86 S.Ct. 1045 , the defendant initially contends that he was denied due process of law because of the juvenile court’s failure to hold a hearing before relinquishing its jurisdiction over him to the criminal division.

1972Relying on Kent v. United States, 383 U.S. 541 , 16 L.Ed.2d 84 , 86 S.Ct. 1045 , the defendant initially contends that he was denied due process of law because of the juvenile court’s failure to hold a hearing before relinquishing its jurisdiction over him to the criminal division.

11972–1972
The People v. Ortiz green
ill · 1926
1 sentence

1927People v. Ortez, 320 Ill. 205 .

11927–1927

Where else courts name it

NY 317 (1969–2026) OH 90 (1978–2026) WI 65 (1974–2026) CO 53 (1980–2026) TX 39 (1979–2026) FL 31 (1964–2023) DC 24 (1974–2025) MA 21 (1976–2024) PA 13 (2004–2025) LA 13 (2000–2025) MO 12 (1935–2019) CA 12 (1898–2026) NM 11 (1967–2024) VT 10 (1992–2019) MD 10 (1997–2024) KS 10 (1994–2024) KY 10 (1966–2026) GA 9 (1983–2025) CT 8 (1942–2024) TN 7 (1970–2024) WY 7 (1999–2022) IL 7 (1927–2023) ME 6 (1985–2026) WA 6 (2011–2021) AL 5 (1979–2008) NC 5 (2012–2026) MS 5 (1987–2012) IN 5 (1893–2023) NE 3 (2021–2025) OR 3 (2024–2025) IA 2 (2017–2020) VA 2 (2013–2023) MT 2 (2005–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check