Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Graygreen2 sentences2017See State v. Gray, 303 Kan. 1011, 1013 , 368 P.3d 1113 (2016) (When a defendant files a motion to correct illegal sentence, a district court may dismiss the motion without a hearing or appointment of counsel if "'"'"the motion, files, and records of the case conclusively show the defendant is not entitled to relief."'"'"). 2017See State v. Gray, 303 Kan. 1011, 1013 , 368 P.3d 1113 (2016) (When a defendant files a motion to correct illegal sentence, a district court may dismiss the motion without a hearing or appointment of counsel if "'"'"the motion, files, and records of the case conclusively show the defendant is not entitled to relief."'"'"). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Dukegreen1 sentence2016Makthepharak, 298 Kan. at 576 (citing State v. Jones, 292 Kan. 910, 913 , 257 P.3d 268 [2011]); accord Duke, 263 Kan. at 195-96 (preliminary treatment of motion to correct illegal sentence intended to be the same as a K.S.A. 60- 1507 motion). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Adams
green
2 sentences2024State v. Adams, 311 Kan. 569 , 577-78, 465 P.3d 176 (2020). 2024State v. Adams, 311 Kan. 569 , 577-78, 465 P.3d 176 (2020). | 2 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Verser
green
2 sentences2020Accordingly, Allen was not given an opportunity to be present to object to the State's continuance request. 3 "An appellate argument on a 'defendant's right to be present at every critical stage of his or her criminal trial raise[s] an issue of law over which this court exercises unlimited review.' State v. Verser, 299 Kan. 776, 787 , 326 P.3d 1046 (2014)." State v. Wright, 305 Kan. 1176 , 1178, 390 P.3d 899 (2017). 2020Accordingly, Allen was not given an opportunity to be present to object to the State's continuance request. 3 "An appellate argument on a 'defendant's right to be present at every critical stage of his or her criminal trial raise[s] an issue of law over which this court exercises unlimited review.' State v. Verser, 299 Kan. 776, 787 , 326 P.3d 1046 (2014)." State v. Wright, 305 Kan. 1176 , 1178, 390 P.3d 899 (2017). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Makthepharak v. State
green
1 sentence2016Makthepharak, 298 Kan. at 576 (citing State v. Jones, 292 Kan. 910, 913 , 257 P.3d 268 [2011]); accord Duke, 263 Kan. at 195-96 (preliminary treatment of motion to correct illegal sentence intended to be the same as a K.S.A. 60- 1507 motion). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Jones
green
2 sentences2016Makthepharak, 298 Kan. at 576 (citing State v. Jones, 292 Kan. 910, 913 , 257 P.3d 268 [2011]); accord Duke, 263 Kan. at 195-96 (preliminary treatment of motion to correct illegal sentence intended to be the same as a K.S.A. 60- 1507 motion). 2016Makthepharak, 298 Kan. at 576 (citing State v. Jones, 292 Kan. 910, 913 , 257 P.3d 268 [2011]); accord Duke, 263 Kan. at 195-96 (preliminary treatment of motion to correct illegal sentence intended to be the same as a K.S.A. 60- 1507 motion). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Ortiz
green
2 sentences2013We conclude the district court erred by summarily denying Iiannebohn’s motion to file an appeal out of time, and we remand with directions for the district court to hold a hearing and make findings pursuant to State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733 , Syl. ¶ 3, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982). 2013We conclude the district court erred by summarily denying Iiannebohn’s motion to file an appeal out of time, and we remand with directions for the district court to hold a hearing and make findings pursuant to State v. Ortiz, 230 Kan. 733 , Syl. ¶ 3, 640 P.2d 1255 (1982). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Price v. State
green
1 sentence2004Estes v. State, 221 Kan. 412, 414 , 559 P.2d 392 (1977); Price v. State, 28 Kan. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Estes v. State
green
2 sentences2004Estes v. State, 221 Kan. 412, 414 , 559 P.2d 392 (1977); Price v. State, 28 Kan. 2004Estes v. State, 221 Kan. 412, 414 , 559 P.2d 392 (1977); Price v. State, 28 Kan. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
State v. Pierce
green
2 sentences1994In State v. Pierce, 246 Kan. 183 , 787 P.2d 1189 (1990), the defendant contended his rights to counsel and to a hearing on his motion to modify his sentence had been violated when the trial court ruled upon the motion without a hearing. 1994In State v. Pierce, 246 Kan. 183 , 787 P.2d 1189 (1990), the defendant contended his rights to counsel and to a hearing on his motion to modify his sentence had been violated when the trial court ruled upon the motion without a hearing. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.