7 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brock v. Stategreen2 sentences2007We have also recognized that "lilf the defendant offers no plausible reason for withdrawal, the trial court has discretion to deny the motion without a hearing." Brock v. State, 981 P.2d 465, 468 (Wyo.1999). *547 Valle v. State, 2006 WY 43, ¶ 7 , 132 P.3d 181, 184 (Wyo.2006). [T11] Ultimately, the decision of the district court regarding a motion to withdraw the plea "will not be reversed [by this Court] for an abuse of discretion so long as the district court reasonably could conclude as it did." DeLoge, ¶ 16, 123 P.3d at 579 (quoting Nixon v. State 4 P.3d 864, 869 (Wyo.2000)). 2006We have also recognized that “[i]f the defendant offers no plausible reason for withdrawal, the trial court has discretion to deny the motion without a hearing.” Brock v. State, 981 P.2d 465, 468 (Wyo.1999). | 2 | 3 |
Robert Ray Schneider v. The State of Wyominggreen2 sentences2022See generally Schneider v. State, 2022 WY 31, ¶ 16 , 505 P.3d 591, 595 (Wyo. 2022) (finding a court must hold a hearing on an application to remove an ignition interlock device if an applicant makes a prima facie showing of good cause); 49 C.J.S. 2022See generally Schneider v. State, 2022 WY 31, ¶ 16 , 505 P.3d 591, 595 (Wyo. 2022) (finding a court must hold a hearing on an application to remove an ignition interlock device if an applicant makes a prima facie showing of good cause); 49 C.J.S. | 1 | 1 |
In Re US Currency Totaling $7,209.00green2 sentences2022See In re U.S. Currency Totaling $7,209.00, 2012 WY 75, ¶ 19 , 278 P.3d 234, 239 (Wyo. 2012). 2022See In re U.S. Currency Totaling $7,209.00, 2012 WY 75, ¶ 19 , 278 P.3d 234, 239 (Wyo. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Lacey v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Additionally, this Court "may affirm the district court's decision on any legal ground appearing in the record." De-Loge, ¶ 17, 123 P.3d at 579 (citing Lacey v. State, 2003 WY 148, ¶ 10 , 79 P.3d 493, 495 (Wyo.2003)). 2007Additionally, this Court "may affirm the district court's decision on any legal ground appearing in the record." De-Loge, ¶ 17, 123 P.3d at 579 (citing Lacey v. State, 2003 WY 148, ¶ 10 , 79 P.3d 493, 495 (Wyo.2003)). | 1 | 1 |
Nixon v. Stategreen1 sentence2007We have also recognized that "lilf the defendant offers no plausible reason for withdrawal, the trial court has discretion to deny the motion without a hearing." Brock v. State, 981 P.2d 465, 468 (Wyo.1999). *547 Valle v. State, 2006 WY 43, ¶ 7 , 132 P.3d 181, 184 (Wyo.2006). [T11] Ultimately, the decision of the district court regarding a motion to withdraw the plea "will not be reversed [by this Court] for an abuse of discretion so long as the district court reasonably could conclude as it did." DeLoge, ¶ 16, 123 P.3d at 579 (quoting Nixon v. State 4 P.3d 864, 869 (Wyo.2000)). | 1 | 1 |
Valle v. Stategreen2 sentences2007We have also recognized that "lilf the defendant offers no plausible reason for withdrawal, the trial court has discretion to deny the motion without a hearing." Brock v. State, 981 P.2d 465, 468 (Wyo.1999). *547 Valle v. State, 2006 WY 43, ¶ 7 , 132 P.3d 181, 184 (Wyo.2006). [T11] Ultimately, the decision of the district court regarding a motion to withdraw the plea "will not be reversed [by this Court] for an abuse of discretion so long as the district court reasonably could conclude as it did." DeLoge, ¶ 16, 123 P.3d at 579 (quoting Nixon v. State 4 P.3d 864, 869 (Wyo.2000)). 2007We have also recognized that "lilf the defendant offers no plausible reason for withdrawal, the trial court has discretion to deny the motion without a hearing." Brock v. State, 981 P.2d 465, 468 (Wyo.1999). *547 Valle v. State, 2006 WY 43, ¶ 7 , 132 P.3d 181, 184 (Wyo.2006). [T11] Ultimately, the decision of the district court regarding a motion to withdraw the plea "will not be reversed [by this Court] for an abuse of discretion so long as the district court reasonably could conclude as it did." DeLoge, ¶ 16, 123 P.3d at 579 (quoting Nixon v. State 4 P.3d 864, 869 (Wyo.2000)). | 1 | 1 |
Patrick v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Patrick v. State, 2005 WY 32, ¶ 8 , 108 P.3d 838, 841 (Wyo.2005). [¶ 13] For this reason, we dismiss this appeal and remand the matter to the district court with directions that it rule in a timely manner on the merits of DeLoge’s motion for the return of his property. 2005See Patrick v. State, 2005 WY 32, ¶ 8 , 108 P.3d 838, 841 (Wyo.2005). [¶ 13] For this reason, we dismiss this appeal and remand the matter to the district court with directions that it rule in a timely manner on the merits of DeLoge’s motion for the return of his property. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In the Interest of Cra, a Minor Child. Db v. State
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Osborn v. State
green
1 sentence1999Osborn, 672 P.2d at 788 (quoting Ecker, 545 P.2d at 642 ). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Ecker v. State
green
1 sentence1999Osborn, 672 P.2d at 788 (quoting Ecker, 545 P.2d at 642 ). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.