Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
MB Financial Bank, N.A. v. Ted & Paul, LLCgreen2 sentences2019There are, however, two exceptions to section 15-1509(c)’s bar: (1) where a party seeks to challenge the judgment as void due to lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction (see MB Financial Bank, N.A. v. Ted & Paul, LLC, 2013 IL App (1st) 122077, ¶ 22 ; Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Brewer, 2012 IL App (1st) 111213, ¶ 15 ); and (2) where a party may seek relief in the form of claiming an interest in the proceeds of the sale (735 ILCS 5/15-1509(c) (West 2016)). ¶ 13 The Taylors argue that the first exception is implicated here. 2017See MB Financial Bank, N.A. v. Ted & Paul, LLC, 2013 IL App (1st) 122077, ¶ 22 ; Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Brewer, 2012 IL App (1st) 111213, ¶ 15 . | 2 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Brewer
green
2 sentences2019There are, however, two exceptions to section 15-1509(c)’s bar: (1) where a party seeks to challenge the judgment as void due to lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction (see MB Financial Bank, N.A. v. Ted & Paul, LLC, 2013 IL App (1st) 122077, ¶ 22 ; Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Brewer, 2012 IL App (1st) 111213, ¶ 15 ); and (2) where a party may seek relief in the form of claiming an interest in the proceeds of the sale (735 ILCS 5/15-1509(c) (West 2016)). ¶ 13 The Taylors argue that the first exception is implicated here. 2017See MB Financial Bank, N.A. v. Ted & Paul, LLC, 2013 IL App (1st) 122077, ¶ 22 ; Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Brewer, 2012 IL App (1st) 111213, ¶ 15 . | 3 | 2017–2019 |
Evans v. Brown
green
2 sentences2015App. 3d at 251 , 925 N.E.2d at 1277 , this court explained the proper procedure to be used when a party seeks to bar the trial court from considering certain evidence for purposes of summary judgment. 2015App. 3d at 251 , 925 N.E.2d at 1277 , this court explained the proper procedure to be used when a party seeks to bar the trial court from considering certain evidence for purposes of summary judgment. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Taylor v. Bayview Loan Servicing
green
1 sentence2025Taylor, 2019 IL App (1st) 172652, ¶ 12 . ¶ 23 In the case at bar, Synosure did not make any argument in its opening brief with respect to section 15-1509(c) and makes such argument for the first time in its reply brief where it maintains that it can address the implications of the statute because it can always respond to arguments raised by the appellee. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
The Sierra Club v. The Office of Mines and Minerals of the Department of Natural Resources
green
1 sentence2023Sierra Club v. - 13 - No. 1-22-1081 Office of Mines & Minerals of Department of Natural Resources, 2015 IL App (4th) 140405 , ¶ 24. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.