Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. Hoffman Group, Inc.green2 sentences2023“Under the collateral source rule, benefits received by the injured party from a source wholly independent of, and collateral to, the tortfeasor will not diminish damages otherwise recoverable from the tortfeasor.” Wilson v. Hoffman Group, Inc., 131 Ill. 2d 308, 320 (1989). 2020“Under the collateral source rule, benefits received by the injured party from a source wholly independent of, and collateral to, the tortfeasor will not diminish damages otherwise recoverable from the tortfeasor.” Wilson v. Hoffman Group, Inc., 131 Ill. 2d 308, 320 (1989). | 2 | 2 |
VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC v. Alstongreen2 sentences2023See Velocity Investments, LLC v. Alston, 397 Ill. App. 3d 296, 297-98 (2010) (choosing to reach the merits of the argument despite the party’s disregard of the rules). 2020See Velocity Investments, LLC v. Alston, 397 Ill. App. 3d 296, 297-98 (2010) (choosing to reach the merits of the argument despite the party’s disregard of the rules). | 2 | 2 |
People Ex Rel. Madigan v. Kinzergreen2 sentences2017See Kinzer, 232 Ill. 2d at 184-85 (“[w]e may not depart from a statute’s plain language by reading into it exceptions, limitations, or conditions the legislature did not express”). 2017See Kinzer, 232 Ill. 2d at 184-85 (“[w]e may not depart from a statute’s plain language by reading into it exceptions, limitations, or conditions the legislature did not express”). | 2 | 2 |
Department of Transportation v. Singhgreen1 sentence2023Where the text of a statute is clear and unambiguous, as is the case herein, we need not resort to canons of statutory construction (Department of Transportation v. Singh, 393 Ill. App. 3d 458, 465 (2009)), e.g., the principle that if there is a conflict between a general and a specific provision, the specific provision prevails. | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2020See Johnson, 386 Ill. App. 3d at 554 (noting that, in the absence of an adequate record, we presume that the court’s order was supported by a sufficient factual basis and was entered in conformity with the law). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martin-Trigona v. Roderick
green
2 sentences2014Martin-Trigona, 29 Ill. 2014Martin-Trigona, 29 Ill. | 3 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.