record contains exception in Illinois

1903The errors.here assigned question only the finding and judgment, and the record contains no exception to such finding or the judgment rendered, neither of which is so much as mentioned in the bill of exceptions.” Citing Parsons v. Evans, 17 Ill. 238 ; Daniels v. Shields, 38 Ill. 197 ; James v. Dexter, 113 Id. 654; Martin v. Foulke, supra; Mfg.

1897The following are some of the cases in which the rule is stated and the power of review denied: Parsons v. Evans, 17 Ill. 238 ; Daniels v. Shields, 38 id. 197; James v. Dexter, 113 id. 654; Martin v. Foulke, 114 id. 206; Force Manf.

1935(People v. Martin, 304 Ill. 494 .) Defendant was a stranger to both of the identifying witnesses.

1931Jur. 1333-1341; Petition of Perrier, 103 Ill. 367 ; VanMatre v. Sankey, supra. The record contains no error requiring reversal, and the decree of the circuit court will be affirmed.

1931Jur. 1333-1341; Petition of Perrier, 103 Ill. 367 ; VanMatre v. Sankey, supra. The record contains no error requiring reversal, and the decree of the circuit court will be affirmed.

1910Cochran v. Village of Park Ridge, 138 Ill. 295 ; McCaleb v. Coon Run Drainage District, 190 id. 549.

1908Co. v. Kellogg, 82 Ill. 614 ; Niehoff v. People, 171 id. 243; Domestic Building Ass. v. Nelson, 172 id. 386; Staunton Coal Co. v. Menk, 197 id. 369.) Although the record contains no rule of court requiring notice, all reasonable effort to give notice to the plaintiff was made, and the method adopted was a proper and effectual one for the purpose.

1904The errors here assigned question only the finding and judgment, and the record contains no exception to such finding or the judgment rendered, neither of which is so much as mentioned in the bill of exceptions.” And in People v. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Co. 200 Ill. 289 , on page 290 the court said: “It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that an objection was preferred or any exception taken to the finding and judgment of the trial court. * * * The authority to certify that an objection was made and exception taken to the action of the court in entering judgment rested in the

1904Such an objection can only be preserved and brought to our judicial notice b;7' being incorporated into the bill of exceptions'. ” And in Cincinnati, Indianapolis and Western Railway Co. v. People, 205 Ill. 538 , on page 541 it was said: ■ “No proposition of law respecting those taxes was submitted, and the only complaint is, that the final judgment of the court upon the law and tlie evidence was wrong.

1903The errors.here assigned question only the finding and judgment, and the record contains no exception to such finding or the judgment rendered, neither of which is so much as mentioned in the bill of exceptions.” Citing Parsons v. Evans, 17 Ill. 238 ; Daniels v. Shields, 38 Ill. 197 ; James v. Dexter, 113 Id. 654; Martin v. Foulke, supra; Mfg.

1903Co. v. Horton, 74 Id. 310 ; Bank v. LeMoyne, 127 Id. 253 .

1903The errors.here assigned question only the finding and judgment, and the record contains no exception to such finding or the judgment rendered, neither of which is so much as mentioned in the bill of exceptions.” Citing Parsons v. Evans, 17 Ill. 238 ; Daniels v. Shields, 38 Ill. 197 ; James v. Dexter, 113 Id. 654; Martin v. Foulke, supra; Mfg.