Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Orthgreen2 sentences2021Id. ¶ 21 To admit the results of a breath test into evidence, the State must lay a proper foundation, including “evidence that the breath test machine used for the test * * * was working properly, and was tested regularly for accuracy.” People v. Claudio, 371 Ill. App. 3d 1067, 1069-70 (2007) (citing People v. Orth, 124 Ill. 2d 326, 340 (1988); People v. Larsen, 323 Ill. App. 3d 1022, 1027 (2001)). “[T]he State must establish that the test was performed in accordance with section 11- 501.2(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code [citation] and the regulations promulgated by the Illinois Department of 2021Id. ¶ 21 To admit the results of a breath test into evidence, the State must lay a proper foundation, including “evidence that the breath test machine used for the test * * * was working properly, and was tested regularly for accuracy.” People v. Claudio, 371 Ill. App. 3d 1067, 1069-70 (2007) (citing People v. Orth, 124 Ill. 2d 326, 340 (1988); People v. Larsen, 323 Ill. App. 3d 1022, 1027 (2001)). “[T]he State must establish that the test was performed in accordance with section 11- 501.2(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code [citation] and the regulations promulgated by the Illinois Department of | 1 | 4 |
People v. Larsengreen2 sentences2021Id. ¶ 21 To admit the results of a breath test into evidence, the State must lay a proper foundation, including “evidence that the breath test machine used for the test * * * was working properly, and was tested regularly for accuracy.” People v. Claudio, 371 Ill. App. 3d 1067, 1069-70 (2007) (citing People v. Orth, 124 Ill. 2d 326, 340 (1988); People v. Larsen, 323 Ill. App. 3d 1022, 1027 (2001)). “[T]he State must establish that the test was performed in accordance with section 11- 501.2(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code [citation] and the regulations promulgated by the Illinois Department of 2007Orth, 124 Ill. 2d at 340 ; Larsen, 323 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Claudiogreen1 sentence2021Id. ¶ 21 To admit the results of a breath test into evidence, the State must lay a proper foundation, including “evidence that the breath test machine used for the test * * * was working properly, and was tested regularly for accuracy.” People v. Claudio, 371 Ill. App. 3d 1067, 1069-70 (2007) (citing People v. Orth, 124 Ill. 2d 326, 340 (1988); People v. Larsen, 323 Ill. App. 3d 1022, 1027 (2001)). “[T]he State must establish that the test was performed in accordance with section 11- 501.2(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code [citation] and the regulations promulgated by the Illinois Department of | 1 | 1 |
People v. Clairmontgreen1 sentence2021Id. ¶ 21 To admit the results of a breath test into evidence, the State must lay a proper foundation, including “evidence that the breath test machine used for the test * * * was working properly, and was tested regularly for accuracy.” People v. Claudio, 371 Ill. App. 3d 1067, 1069-70 (2007) (citing People v. Orth, 124 Ill. 2d 326, 340 (1988); People v. Larsen, 323 Ill. App. 3d 1022, 1027 (2001)). “[T]he State must establish that the test was performed in accordance with section 11- 501.2(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code [citation] and the regulations promulgated by the Illinois Department of | 1 | 1 |
People v. Ebertgreen1 sentence2012People v. Ebert, 401 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
The People v. Mulack
green
2 sentences2008Our own supreme court, in rejecting an argument that the State’s attempt to admit the results of a breath test which the defendant claimed he was compelled to take was in violation of his fifth amendment rights, adopted the holding in Sehmerber in Mulack, 40 Ill. 2d at 431-33 . 2008Our own supreme court, 20 1-07-3262 in rejecting an argument that the State’s attempt to admit the results of a breath test which the defendant claimed he was compelled to take in violation of his fifth amendment rights, adopted the holding in Schmerber in Mulack, 40 Ill. 2d at 431-33 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Thompson
green
1 sentence2021Id. ¶ 21 To admit the results of a breath test into evidence, the State must lay a proper foundation, including “evidence that the breath test machine used for the test * * * was working properly, and was tested regularly for accuracy.” People v. Claudio, 371 Ill. App. 3d 1067, 1069-70 (2007) (citing People v. Orth, 124 Ill. 2d 326, 340 (1988); People v. Larsen, 323 Ill. App. 3d 1022, 1027 (2001)). “[T]he State must establish that the test was performed in accordance with section 11- 501.2(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code [citation] and the regulations promulgated by the Illinois Department of | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.