Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Surestaff, Inc. v. Azteca Foods, Inc.green1 sentence2014Surestaff, Inc. v. Azteca Foods, Inc., 374 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Stift v. Lizzadro
green
2 sentences2008Stift, 362 Ill. 2008Stift, 362 Ill. | 4 | 2007–2008 |
People v. Smith
green
1 sentence2021Smith, 2017 IL App (1st) 143728, ¶ 62 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
People v. Britz
green
1 sentence1989It is the burden of the party who desires a specific instruction to present it to the court and request that it be given to the jury. ( People v. Britz (1988), 123 Ill.2d 446, 475 ; People v. Underwood (1978), 72 Ill.2d 124, 129 ; People v. Parks (1976), 65 Ill.2d 132, 137 .) Generally, the only situations where a fair trial requires the court to sua sponte offer an instruction include "seeing *563 that the jury is instructed on the elements of the crime charged, on the presumption of innocence and on the question of burden of proof." ( 65 Ill.2d at 137 .) The trial court did not commit error | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Underwood
green
1 sentence1989It is the burden of the party who desires a specific instruction to present it to the court and request that it be given to the jury. ( People v. Britz (1988), 123 Ill.2d 446, 475 ; People v. Underwood (1978), 72 Ill.2d 124, 129 ; People v. Parks (1976), 65 Ill.2d 132, 137 .) Generally, the only situations where a fair trial requires the court to sua sponte offer an instruction include "seeing *563 that the jury is instructed on the elements of the crime charged, on the presumption of innocence and on the question of burden of proof." ( 65 Ill.2d at 137 .) The trial court did not commit error | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Parks
green
2 sentences1989It is the burden of the party who desires a specific instruction to present it to the court and request that it be given to the jury. ( People v. Britz (1988), 123 Ill.2d 446, 475 ; People v. Underwood (1978), 72 Ill.2d 124, 129 ; People v. Parks (1976), 65 Ill.2d 132, 137 .) Generally, the only situations where a fair trial requires the court to sua sponte offer an instruction include "seeing *563 that the jury is instructed on the elements of the crime charged, on the presumption of innocence and on the question of burden of proof." ( 65 Ill.2d at 137 .) The trial court did not commit error 1989It is the burden of the party who desires a specific instruction to present it to the court and request that it be given to the jury. ( People v. Britz (1988), 123 Ill.2d 446, 475 ; People v. Underwood (1978), 72 Ill.2d 124, 129 ; People v. Parks (1976), 65 Ill.2d 132, 137 .) Generally, the only situations where a fair trial requires the court to sua sponte offer an instruction include "seeing *563 that the jury is instructed on the elements of the crime charged, on the presumption of innocence and on the question of burden of proof." ( 65 Ill.2d at 137 .) The trial court did not commit error | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.