Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.green2 sentences2011See First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp., 63 Ill.2d 128, 133 , 345 N.E.2d 493 (1976) (where the record in the case is neither lengthy nor complicated and the issue is one of law, an appeal may be decided properly without the aid of an appellee's brief). ¶ 10 A. Standard of Review ¶ 11 Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 735 ILCS 5/2-1005(c) (West 2008). 2011See First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp., 63 Ill.2d 128, 133 , 345 N.E.2d 493 (1976) (where the record in the case is neither lengthy nor complicated and the issue is one of law, an appeal may be decided properly without the aid of an appellee's brief). ¶ 10 A. Standard of Review ¶ 11 Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 735 ILCS 5/2-1005(c) (West 2008). | 2 | 2 |
Fifth Third Bank v. Rosengreen2 sentences2021Id. ¶ 19 The Treasurer’s motion for summary determination was based on sovereign immunity. 2021She asks us to reverse the trial court’s order granting the Treasurer’s motion for summary determination. ¶ 18 Section 2-1005(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Code) allows a party to seek a summary determination of “ ‘one or more, but less than all, of the major issues in the case, [if] the court finds that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to that issue or those issues.’ ” Fifth Third Bank, N.A. v. Rosen, 2011 IL App (1st) 093533, ¶ 21 (quoting 735 ILCS 5/2-1005(d) (West 2008)). | 1 | 2 |
Foutch v. O'BRYANTgreen1 sentence2024Foutch v. O’Bryant, 99 Ill. 2d 389, 391 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Illinois Health Maintenance Organization Guaranty Ass'n v. Shapogreen1 sentence2009Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d at 526-27 ; see also Illinois Health Maintenance Organization, 357 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Ball v. County of Cookgreen1 sentence2009Ball v. County of Cook, 385 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Midwest Builder Distributing, Inc. v. Lord and Essex, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024“The test to be applied is whether this court is in the same position as the trial court with respect to the legally operative facts of the case.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. 14 ¶ 49 We find the record is sufficient to consider the Treasurer’s challenge to the circuit court’s order. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Steinbrecher v. Steinbrecher
green
1 sentence2009Steinbrecher, 197 Ill. 2d at 526-27 ; see also Illinois Health Maintenance Organization, 357 Ill. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority v. Heritage Standard Bank
green
1 sentence2009As addressed in Heritage, section 2 — 1303 applies to “awards, reports, and verdicts,” which “are liquidated sums representing adjudications of disputed facts and issues upon which judgment was entered.” Heritage, 157 Ill. 2d at 301 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.